Retarded Archangeloi who completed only six of their seven principles on the Old Moon, were cast down to Earth, and dragged human language below its intended level.
The Ahrimanic Archangeloi in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's name for a class of Archangeloi who completed only six of their seven principles during the Old Moon evolution and were therefore cast down to the Earth instead of guiding humanity's folk groups from the spiritual world. Steiner describes them in the lecture cycle Artistic and Existential Questions in the Light of Spiritual Science (GA 162, Dornach, 1915). Because the Spirits of Form could not employ them as rightful folk leaders, the highest of their own kind sent them out to the various peoples of the Earth, where they dragged human speech one stage lower than intended: the idea contained in a word could no longer be experienced directly within it. Steiner names them the spiritual cause of the delusion of nationalism, which ripened in the nineteenth century through Napoleon. Today the term informs anthroposophical readings of language, group identity, and national conflict.
Steiner's account of the Ahrimanic Archangeloi answers a hard question: why do languages divide humanity into groups that misunderstand and oppose one another? These beings, retarded on the Old Moon, could not serve the Spirits of Form as rightful folk guides. Cast out of the spiritual world, they attached themselves to the peoples of the Earth and pressed language down to a level where words conceal ideas rather than reveal them.
In Steiner's Own Words
They were highly developed beings but they were not the rightful leaders of peoples, for the simple reason that according to the intentions of the Spirits of Form, this leadership was meant to lie with the normal Archangeloi who have developed all their seven principles. It was especially the beings who had developed only six of their principles who now set themselves in opposition to the legitimate leaders of peoples. It is the Ahrimanic beings who have been the cause of languages sinking a stage lower, to a stage where to begin with men simply do not perceive what concepts, what ideas, are contained in the actual words of language.
What it Means Today
In 1983 the political scientist Benedict Anderson published Imagined Communities, still the most cited modern study of where nations come from. Anderson argued that a nation is not an ancient natural fact but an imagined community, and that the thing doing the imagining is language: print capitalism fused local dialects into fixed vernaculars, and readers who would never meet came to feel themselves one people because they read the same words. Anderson also noticed the strange dignity this gives a tongue, that nations treat their language as sacred, older than any state, worth dying for.
Steiner's lecture of 18 July 1915 works the same terrain from the other side. Where Anderson describes how bounded language communities produce national feeling, Steiner asks what pressed language into bounded, mutually opaque communities in the first place, and answers with the Ahrimanic Archangeloi: beings who fastened peoples to their languages so firmly that the idea in a word could no longer be felt across borders. Both accounts refuse the comfortable view that nationalism is simply natural, and both locate its engine in speech. The Thalira synthesis: the Ahrimanic Archangeloi name the point where a folk instrument becomes a folk idol, the moment a language stops carrying ideas to every human being and starts marking who belongs. Anyone who practises what Steiner sets against them, seeking the truth clothed in another people's language rather than one's own, is working against a current Anderson could measure but not name.
Where to Read More