In GA 178 Steiner describes cast-off human etheric bodies occupied by demonic spirits, the Eastern lodges' counterpart to the Western brotherhoods' captive dead.
Demon-Occupied Etheric Bodies in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's term for a specific occult manipulation he attributed to left-hand Eastern lodges: after death a person lays aside the etheric body (Ätherleib), the life-organizing member that is normally received back into the cosmos within days, but demonic spirits standing outside earthly evolution can be enticed to clothe themselves in these cast-off sheaths. Steiner set out the mechanism in Dornach on 18 November 1917, in the cycle published as Individual Spirit Beings and Their Influence on the Soul-Life of Man (GA 178). He framed it as the Eastern counterpart to the Western brotherhoods' captive dead: lodges that never developed an esotericism for holding dead souls work instead with demon-clothed etheric remnants, presented to whole communities as venerable ancestors. In his account the shared aim of both streams is to make the twentieth-century appearing of the etheric Christ pass unnoticed.
Demon-occupied etheric bodies are discarded human life-sheaths that demonic beings put on like garments. The demons have no part in earth evolution; they enter it by wearing what the dead leave behind. Steiner claimed certain Eastern lodges drew such beings into their circles and taught the surrounding communities to worship them as ancestors, a cult built on a real etheric remnant and a false identification.
In Steiner's Own Words
When a man dies, he gives up his etheric body, which separates from the physical body, as you know, soon after death, and is then normally taken up into the cosmos. This is a somewhat complicated process; I have described it for you in various ways. But before the Mystery of Golgotha something else was possible, and even afterwards it was still possible, especially in the East. When a man surrenders his etheric body after death, certain beings can clothe themselves in it and become etheric beings with the aid of these etheric bodies of dead men. This is what happens in the East: demonic beings are enticed to clothe themselves in the etheric bodies which men have cast aside; and it is these spirits who are drawn into the Eastern lodges.
What it Means Today
Steiner's charge is not that honouring the dead is demonic. It is a claim about occupancy: the being addressed under an ancestor's name may not be the ancestor at all. Anthropology reached the same hinge from the outside. In Gods, Ghosts, and Ancestors: The Folk Religion of a Taiwanese Village (University of California Press, 1972), David K. Jordan documented how families in the settlement he called Bao-an sorted their dead into three shifting categories, god, ghost, and ancestor, and renegotiated that sorting whenever misfortune struck the household. Which being actually stood behind a given tablet was never simply given; it was argued over, tested through divination, and revised. Jordan was recording social facts, not etheric ones, yet his fieldwork exposes exactly the join Steiner had pointed to fifty-five years earlier: every ancestor cult rests on an unverified identification between the name honoured and the presence that answers.
Steiner's Dornach lectures push the question one layer further down, into the fate of the cast-off etheric sheath itself. Thalira synthesis: Jordan watched the doorway from the side of the living, Steiner named what can enter from the other side, and the two accounts meet in a single practical demand, that reverence for the dead be paired with discernment about who is receiving it. For the practitioner, veneration is never passive: ask who answers before you bow.
Where to Read More