The being that Western brotherhoods of the left intend to set in the place of the true etheric Christ, so that humanity reveres a substitute under the borrowed name.
The Counterfeit Etheric Christ in Anthroposophy is the substitute being that Rudolf Steiner says certain Western brotherhoods of the left plan to set in the place of the true Christ, described in the lecture cycle Individual Spirit Beings and Their Influence on the Soul-Life of Man (GA 178, Dornach, 18 November 1917). Because the true Christ passed through the Mystery of Golgotha in a single incarnation and returns in the twentieth century only as an etheric being, never again in the flesh, these brotherhoods intend to promote a different individuality, one that has never incarnated in earthly evolution and has reached only etheric embodiment, and to have humanity call that being the Christ. The counterfeit is of a strongly Ahrimanic nature. Steiner names knowledge of the scheme as the sole protection against it, a claim that parallels the pseudo-Christ tradition documented by the historian Bernard McGinn.
The Counterfeit Etheric Christ names the darkest manoeuvre Steiner attributes to occult brotherhoods of the West: since no initiate, however mighty, can prevent the true Christ from appearing etherically, the only move left is substitution. An Ahrimanic individuality, etheric but never incarnated, is to be publicly designated the Christ, so that reverence meant for the being of Golgotha flows toward a ruler the lodges can direct.
In Steiner's Own Words
This other being whom the brotherhood wishes to substitute as ruler they will call “Christ”; they will actually designate him as the “Christ.” What will be important will be to distinguish between the true Christ, Who, when He appears, will not be an individuality incarnated in the flesh, and the being that is distinguished from the true Christ by having never yet incarnated during earthly evolution. This other being is one who has only reached etheric embodiment, and he will be put by the brotherhoods in the place of Christ, Who is to pass by unobserved.
What it Means Today
The pattern Steiner describes, a deceiver dangerous because of resemblance rather than opposition, is the oldest thread in Christian apocalyptic writing. Bernard McGinn, the University of Chicago historian of Christian mysticism, traced it in Antichrist: Two Thousand Years of the Human Fascination with Evil (1994), from the deceiving figure of 2 Thessalonians 2 through the Donatist exegete Tyconius, who in the fourth century argued that Antichrist works inside the church by imitating Christ, into the medieval legends in which the false messiah performs signs, gathers the devout, and is worshipped in good conscience. McGinn's central finding is that the tradition feared mimicry more than persecution: a persecutor hardens faith, while an impostor who accepts the name of Christ recruits the faculties of devotion themselves.
Steiner's 1917 lectures give that ancient anxiety an exact esoteric mechanism. The counterfeit succeeds not by argument but by arriving in the very mode of appearance the true Christ now uses, the etheric, so that only schooled discrimination can tell the two apart. Thalira synthesis: the counterfeit does not attack reverence, it reroutes reverence, which is why Steiner prescribes no ritual defence at all, only knowledge held to the point of inner certainty. Practically, that is the entire discipline this term asks of a student: learn the marks of the true etheric Christ, one incarnation in the flesh and never another, so thoroughly that no substitute can borrow the name unnoticed.
Where to Read More