In Steiner's anthroposophy, will replaces thinking after death: the soul perceives by willing, shaping itself into the likeness of whatever it seeks to behold.
Will as the Organ of Perception in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's teaching that after death the human soul no longer perceives through senses or thinking but through will itself. Steiner presented it in Supersensible Man (GA 231), a course of lectures held at The Hague in November 1923. In earthly life, will works through the limbs and the metabolic system; between death and rebirth it becomes the soul's single active faculty. To perceive any being in the Moon sphere, the first region crossed after death, the soul must perform an act of will, forming and fashioning itself into the likeness of what it wants to see. One becomes what one wills to perceive. The moral quality gathered in life therefore decides what the dead can behold at all. Cognitive scientists studying enactive perception, notably Alva Noë, now argue that even living perception is an act rather than a reception.
Among the reversals the dead undergo, Steiner counted this one first: thinking, the pride of earthly philosophers, falls silent, and will as the organ of perception takes its place. The soul between death and rebirth sees nothing passively. It must will each perception, molding its own mobile form into the shape of the being it approaches, so that likeness becomes the condition of sight.
In Steiner's Own Words
For it is not thought or reflection, but first and foremost the faculty of will that man possesses after death. Will becomes itself perception, becomes man's whole world of life. He has to perform an act of will whenever he wants to perceive anything. For he must form and fashion himself in accordance with what he wants to see. That is, he must will. He must become like what he wills to perceive. It is above all the will that is developed when a man has passed through the gate of death, and upon it work, for good or ill, the impressions of which I have spoken in connection with the Moon sphere.
What it Means Today
The nearest contemporary neighbour to this teaching works in cognitive science, in the enactivist school that grew out of Francisco Varela, Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch's The Embodied Mind (1991). Its sharpest statement is Alva Noë's Action in Perception (MIT Press, 2004), which argues that perceiving is something we do, not something that happens to us. For Noë, a philosopher at the University of California, Berkeley, seeing depends on sensorimotor skill: the perceiver must move, probe, and adjust, and what shows itself answers to what the body knows how to do. Steiner had pushed the same logic past the boundary of the body in 1923. Once eyes and brain are laid aside at death, nothing remains that could passively receive impressions, so the soul's willed self-shaping must do the whole work the sense organs once did. Thalira synthesis: enactivism and GA 231 describe one law at two scales, for where Noë grounds perception in what the body can do, Steiner grounds it in what the soul has become, so that after death moral character operates as the sensorimotor skill of the spirit.
Steiner drew a practical consequence from this within his training exercises. What a person wills and loves on earth quietly prepares the one faculty of perception the dead possess. The evening backward review he gave his pupils, the Rückschau that replays the day in reverse before sleep, reads in this light less as moral bookkeeping than as the slow shaping of an organ of sight.
Where to Read More