Common Karma in Anthroposophy

Glossary Anthroposophy 3 min read
Common Karma n.

Common karma is destiny carried by whole peoples, classes and generations rather than by one soul, though each individual adjusts it across incarnations.

Common Karma in Anthroposophy is the shared destiny that a people, a social class, or a generation carries together, as distinct from the karma an individual soul weaves for itself. Rudolf Steiner introduced it in the fifth lecture of Theosophy of the Rosicrucian (GA 99), Munich, 29 May 1907, stating that such karma is not determined by the single human being although it is adjusted in the course of his incarnations. Steiner gave two examples: medieval leprosy, which he attributed to decaying astral and etheric substance in the last Hunnic remnants of Atlantis acting on the terror of European populations, and pulmonary tuberculosis, which he traced to the class hatred bred by industry. Because the cause is collective, Steiner held that only work on the common karma itself reaches the individual sufferer. Today the same pattern is read empirically in the social determinants of health.

Common karma is Rudolf Steiner's name for destiny that no single biography can account for: the fate a nation, a class, or a whole generation carries in common. It does not cancel individual karma. It sits beneath it, as the ground a person is born onto. Steiner held that it is settled slowly, across many incarnations, and that its repair is social work rather than private effort.

There is a common karma, karma that is not determined by the single individual although it is adjusted in the course of his incarnations. ... When in the Middle Ages the Huns poured over from Asia into the countries of Europe and caused alarming wars, this too had spiritual significance. The Huns were the last surviving remnants of ancient Atlantean peoples; they were in an advanced stage of decadence which expressed itself in a certain process of decay in their astral and etheric bodies. These products of decay found good soil in the fear and the terror caused among the peoples. The result was that these products of decay were inoculated into the astral bodies of the peoples and in a later generation this was carried over into the physical body. The skin absorbed the astral elements and the outcome was a disease prevalent in the Middle Ages, namely, leprosy.

Rudolf Steiner, Theosophy of the Rosicrucian (GA 99, lecture V, Munich, 29 May 1907)

Steiner's claim that disease can arise from the moral condition of a whole society sounded absurd in 1907. One research lineage has since made it measurable. In 1967 Michael Marmot and colleagues at University College London began the first Whitehall study, following British civil servants for decades, and found that mortality tracked employment grade in a smooth gradient: the lower the rank, the shorter the life, even after smoking, cholesterol and blood pressure were accounted for. Whitehall II, launched in 1985, confirmed the gradient and extended it to women. Marmot went on to chair the World Health Organization Commission on Social Determinants of Health, whose 2008 report Closing the Gap in a Generation argued that unequal health is not natural but a consequence of how societies arrange power, money and resources. His 2010 English review Fair Society, Healthy Lives and his 2015 book The Health Gap carried the argument into policy.

Thalira synthesis: Marmot counts from outside what Steiner described from inside, and the two accounts meet at the same joint, that a body can sicken from a wound in the social order rather than from a defect in the person. Read that way, common karma is not fatalism. It is the reason Steiner told his Munich audience that treating the sufferer alone often fails, and that only work on the shared condition reaches him, which is where the Marmot Review landed a century later.

Back to blog