The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam: Complete Guide to the Persian Masterpiece

Overview

The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam occupies a unique position in world literature: it is simultaneously one of the most popular poems in the English language and one of the most contested acts of literary translation ever undertaken. Edward FitzGerald's 1859 adaptation of Persian quatrains attributed to the 11th-century polymath Omar Khayyam created a poem that became a cultural phenomenon, inspiring countless editions, illustrations, parodies, musical settings, and philosophical debates, while raising questions about the nature of translation, the ethics of cultural interpretation, and the relationship between original text and creative adaptation that remain unresolved.

The poem's trajectory from obscurity to fame is itself a remarkable story. Published anonymously in an edition of 250 copies that failed to sell and was consigned to a London bookseller's penny bin, it was rescued by Dante Gabriel Rossetti and the Pre-Raphaelite circle, who recognized its genius and promoted it until it became, by the 1880s, one of the most widely quoted poems in English. At its peak of popularity in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Rubaiyat clubs formed across the English-speaking world, and the poem was translated into virtually every major language.

Who Was Omar Khayyam?

Ghiyath al-Din Abu'l-Fath Umar ibn Ibrahim al-Khayyami (1048-1131 CE), known in the West as Omar Khayyam, was born in Nishapur, one of the great cities of the medieval Islamic world (in modern northeastern Iran). He was primarily a scientist and mathematician: his treatise on algebra included the first systematic treatment of cubic equations, his astronomical observations led to the reform of the Persian calendar (the Jalali calendar, more accurate than the Gregorian calendar adopted in Europe five centuries later), and he wrote important works on Euclid's parallel postulate that anticipated non-Euclidean geometry.

Khayyam's reputation as a poet was secondary in the Persian-speaking world. The attribution of quatrains to him is complicated by the fact that rubaiyat were often anonymous and circulated orally, accumulating under famous names over the centuries. Scholars disagree about how many of the roughly 1,000 quatrains attributed to Khayyam were actually written by him: estimates range from fewer than 100 to several hundred. Some scholars (notably Ali Dashti in In Search of Omar Khayyam, 1971) have argued that only a core of about 102 quatrains can be attributed to Khayyam with reasonable confidence.

What is clear is that Khayyam, the historical figure, was a man of wide learning whose poetic sensibility was shaped by his mathematical understanding of the universe's order and by his philosophical engagement with the limits of human knowledge. He lived through a period of political instability (the decline of the Seljuk Empire) and intellectual vitality (the flowering of Persian science and literature), and his poetry reflects both the precariousness of existence and the compensations available to a cultivated mind.

Who Was Edward FitzGerald?

Edward FitzGerald (1809-1883) was born into one of the wealthiest families in England. He attended Trinity College, Cambridge, where he formed lifelong friendships with Alfred Lord Tennyson, William Makepeace Thackeray, and Thomas Carlyle. After Cambridge, he lived a quiet, largely reclusive life at his family estates in Suffolk, dividing his time between reading, gardening, sailing, and an extensive correspondence that is itself a minor literary masterpiece.

FitzGerald came to Persian poetry relatively late in life, studying the language with his friend Edward Byles Cowell, a Persian scholar who introduced him to the Bodleian Library's manuscript of Khayyam's quatrains. FitzGerald was immediately captivated by the poetry and spent several years working on his adaptation, which he published anonymously in 1859 as a pamphlet of 75 quatrains.

FitzGerald was always candid about the liberties he took with the original. "My translation will interest you from its form, and also in many respects in its details," he wrote to Cowell, "very un-faithful to the original." He described his method as creating a "tessellation" of Khayyam's quatrains: selecting, rearranging, combining, and sometimes freely rewriting them to produce a continuous meditation with a beginning, middle, and end. The result, he suggested, was "better than any I could do" as original composition but was emphatically not a literal translation.

From Penny Bin to Phenomenon

The first edition appeared in April 1859, published by Bernard Quaritch at one shilling. It attracted no reviews and failed to sell. Quaritch eventually reduced the price to a penny a copy and placed the remaining stock in his bargain bin.

The rescue came through Dante Gabriel Rossetti, the Pre-Raphaelite painter and poet, who found a copy in Quaritch's penny bin and was struck by its beauty. He shared it with his circle, including Algernon Charles Swinburne, William Morris, and John Ruskin. Their enthusiasm spread through literary London, and by the time FitzGerald published his second edition in 1868, the Rubaiyat had become one of the most talked-about poems in England.

By the 1880s, the poem had achieved a popularity that is difficult to imagine today. Rubaiyat clubs and societies formed across the English-speaking world. The poem was printed in hundreds of editions, from cheap pamphlets to lavishly illustrated luxury volumes. Elihu Vedder's illustrated edition (1884) became one of the most celebrated art books of the century. The poem was translated from English into French, German, Italian, Russian, Chinese, Japanese, and dozens of other languages, some of which already had their own traditions of translating Khayyam's original Persian.

Major Themes

The Rubaiyat circles through several interconnected themes:

Mortality and the brevity of life: "One thing is certain, that Life flies; / One thing is certain, and the Rest is Lies; / The Flower that once has blown for ever dies." This recognition is the poem's emotional centre. Everything else follows from it: the call to enjoy the present, the scepticism about metaphysical certainty, the consolation of wine and companionship.

The limits of knowledge: "Myself when young did eagerly frequent / Doctor and Saint, and heard great argument / About it and about: but evermore / Came out by the same door where in I went." Khayyam the mathematician understood the power of reason but also its limits. The deepest questions, Why are we here? What happens after death? Is there a God? Are we free or fated?, cannot be answered by intellect alone. The honest response to this limitation is not despair but a redirection of attention from unanswerable questions to the immediate, tangible pleasures of existence.

The irreversibility of time: "The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ, / Moves on: nor all thy Piety nor Wit / Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line, / Nor all thy Tears wash out a Word of it." This is one of the most quoted passages in English literature. It expresses a truth that all contemplative traditions acknowledge: the past cannot be changed, the future cannot be guaranteed, and the present moment is the only point at which life can actually be lived.

Scepticism toward dogma: The Rubaiyat consistently questions the certainties of both religion and philosophy. "Why, all the Saints and Sages who discuss'd / Of the Two Worlds so wisely, they are thrust / Like foolish Prophets forth; their Words to Scorn / Are scatter'd, and their Mouths are stopt with Dust." Neither the pious nor the wise have returned from death to report what they found. In the absence of certain knowledge, the poem suggests, humility and enjoyment are more appropriate responses than dogmatic assertion.

Wine, roses, and the garden: The imagery of wine, roses, the garden, and the beloved creates a sensory world that stands in contrast to the abstraction of theological argument. Whether this imagery is literal (the pleasures of a Persian garden) or symbolic (Sufi metaphors for spiritual experience) is one of the central debates in Rubaiyat scholarship.

Key Quatrains and Their Meanings

Wine as Symbol

The most contentious question in Rubaiyat interpretation is what the wine represents. Three positions have been argued:

Literal wine: Khayyam was a sceptic and hedonist who advocated the actual consumption of alcohol as a consolation for the miseries of existence. This is FitzGerald's preferred reading, and it is the one that most English-language readers have adopted.

Sufi metaphor: In the Sufi poetic tradition, wine represents the ecstasy of divine love, the tavern represents the place of mystical gathering, the cupbearer represents the spiritual master, and intoxication represents the dissolution of the ego in union with God. Read this way, Khayyam's poetry is not hedonistic but mystical, calling the reader to spiritual rather than physical intoxication.

Philosophical ambiguity: Some scholars argue that Khayyam deliberately exploited the ambiguity between literal and symbolic readings, using wine imagery that could be taken either way depending on the reader's orientation. This ambiguity is itself a philosophical statement: the boundary between physical pleasure and spiritual ecstasy may be less clear than either hedonists or mystics suppose.

The debate is complicated by the fact that FitzGerald consistently chose the hedonistic reading, suppressing the Sufi dimension of the original poetry. His Khayyam is a sceptic, not a mystic, a materialist, not a Sufi. Whether this represents a legitimate interpretation or a cultural appropriation that distorts the original remains one of the most lively debates in translation studies.

The Sufi Debate

Was Omar Khayyam a Sufi? The question has been debated for centuries in the Persian-speaking world and is not definitively resolved.

Evidence for the Sufi reading: The wine, garden, and beloved imagery in Khayyam's quatrains is identical to the symbolic vocabulary of established Sufi poets like Hafiz and Rumi. Persian readers in the Sufi tradition would automatically read this imagery symbolically. Some of Khayyam's quatrains express sentiments that are perfectly aligned with Sufi teaching: the inadequacy of intellectual knowledge, the dissolution of the self, the presence of the divine in ordinary experience.

Evidence against the Sufi reading: Khayyam's mathematical and scientific orientation suggests a rationalist temperament. Some of his quatrains express frank scepticism about the afterlife and about religious claims that would be unusual in a Sufi context. The 12th-century historian al-Qifti described Khayyam as someone who "outwardly" conformed to Islam but was suspected of heterodox views. The Persian scholar Ali Dashti argued that Khayyam was a genuine sceptic, not a Sufi in disguise.

The most balanced view may be that Khayyam occupied an intellectual position that does not map neatly onto either category. He was neither a conventional Sufi nor a simple hedonist but a thinker whose understanding of mathematics and astronomy gave him a sense of the universe's order and beauty that coexisted with a sharp awareness of human mortality and the limits of human knowledge. His poetry emerges from this complex position, and its ambiguity is not a problem to be solved but a feature to be appreciated.

Translation or Transformation?

FitzGerald's method raises fundamental questions about translation. His approach was, by his own admission, "very un-faithful to the original." He selected approximately one-quarter of the quatrains attributed to Khayyam, rearranged them into a narrative sequence (morning to night, spring to winter, youth to age), combined elements from different quatrains into single verses, added his own imagery and philosophical emphasis, and suppressed the Sufi dimension of the original poetry.

The result is less a translation than what the poet Robert Lowell would later call an "imitation": a creative engagement with a foreign text that produces something genuinely new in the target language. The English Rubaiyat is neither Khayyam's poem nor FitzGerald's but a collaboration across nine centuries, two languages, and two radically different cultural contexts.

Scholarly reactions to this method have been divided. The Persian scholar A. J. Arberry produced a more literal translation (The Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam, 1952) to demonstrate how far FitzGerald had departed from the original. Peter Avery and John Heath-Stubbs produced another literal translation (1979) with the same purpose. Dick Davis's bilingual edition (Penguin, 2010) allows readers to compare FitzGerald's versions with direct translations from the Persian.

Yet FitzGerald's version persists as the Rubaiyat for English readers, not despite its infidelities but because of them. What FitzGerald achieved, his defenders argue, is what every great translator achieves: he created a poem that lives independently in the target language, carrying the essential spirit of the original into a new cultural context. The letter was sacrificed; the spirit was preserved, and perhaps amplified.

The Five Editions

The first edition is generally considered the most powerful in its directness and energy. The fifth edition is the most polished but has been criticized for losing some of the original's vitality. Most modern editions print the first or fifth edition; the Oxford World's Classics edition by Daniel Karlin includes all five.

Philosophical Context

The Rubaiyat's philosophical position has affinities with several traditions:

Epicureanism: Epicurus (341-270 BCE) taught that pleasure is the highest good and that the fear of death is the primary source of human suffering. His solution, like Khayyam's, was to embrace simple pleasures (friendship, food, contemplation) and to recognize that death, being the cessation of sensation, is nothing to fear. The Rubaiyat's "Eat, drink, and be merry" resonates with Epicurean ethics, though the original philosophical tradition was far more austere than its popular reputation suggests.

Stoicism: The Stoic concept of memento mori (remember you will die) and the practice of using mortality as a tool for clarifying priorities parallels the Rubaiyat's constant return to the theme of death. Marcus Aurelius wrote: "Think of yourself as dead. You have lived your life. Now take what's left and live it properly." This could serve as the Rubaiyat's epigraph.

Existentialism: Albert Camus's concept of the "absurd," the gap between human desire for meaning and the universe's silence on the subject, is anticipated in the Rubaiyat's combination of clear-eyed recognition of mortality with a determination to find value in existence despite (or because of) its brevity. The Rubaiyat is existentialist avant la lettre.

Buddhism: The recognition of impermanence (anicca) as the fundamental condition of existence, which is central to Buddhist teaching, is also central to the Rubaiyat. The difference is in the response: Buddhism prescribes non-attachment; the Rubaiyat prescribes full engagement with the senses as a response to the same recognition.

Influence and Cultural Impact

The Rubaiyat's influence extends far beyond literature:

Victorian and Edwardian culture: The poem became a cultural touchstone, its quatrains quoted in sermons, political speeches, and private correspondence. Rubaiyat clubs formed in London, New York, and other cities. The poem influenced the Arts and Crafts movement (William Morris), the Aesthetic movement (Oscar Wilde), and the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood.

Book arts: The Rubaiyat inspired some of the most beautiful books ever produced, including Elihu Vedder's illustrated edition (1884), the Sangorski and Sutcliffe "Great Omar" (a jewel-encrusted binding that went down with the Titanic in 1912), and hundreds of other illustrated and decorated editions.

Music: The Rubaiyat has been set to music by Liza Lehmann (a song cycle, 1896), Granville Bantock (an orchestral overture), and many others. Its quatrains appear in popular songs, choral works, and film scores.

Philosophy and spirituality: The poem's philosophical stance, combining clear-eyed mortality awareness with an embrace of present pleasures, has influenced thinkers from Albert Camus to Alan Watts. Its treatment of wine as both literal refreshment and potential spiritual symbol anticipates the modern interest in the relationship between altered states and spiritual experience.

Get the Rubaiyat

Get The Rubaiyat on Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, Thalira earns from qualifying purchases.