Remote Viewing | But What Then Is It? | Thalira

What Remote Viewing Actually Is

Remote viewing is a psychic skill with an unusual biography. Unlike most esoteric practices, it was born inside a government laboratory during the Cold War, developed by physicists and intelligence analysts who needed rigorous protocols, not spiritual frameworks. Understanding what remote viewing actually is means separating the practical skill from both the hype that surrounds it and the dismissal it often receives.

At its core, remote viewing is the structured attempt to perceive information about a target that is hidden from the viewer's normal senses. The target might be a physical location on the other side of the planet, an object sealed in an envelope, a historical event, or a person. The viewer sits quietly, is given only a random number or coordinate as a reference, and uses a specific protocol to record raw impressions.

The word "remote" refers to the distance between viewer and target. The word "viewing" is slightly misleading, because the perception is not purely visual. Experienced viewers report sensory impressions, emotional tones, spatial relationships, temperatures, textures, and abstract conceptual data as much as visual images. The session is written and sketched in real time, creating a record that can be evaluated after the target is revealed.

What makes remote viewing distinctive is the blind protocol. The viewer does not know what the target is, which prevents conscious guessing. A judge or evaluator later compares the viewer's session output against the actual target. This structure makes remote viewing one of the few psychic practices that has been subjected to controlled experimental testing over decades.

The Government Programs: STARGATE and Beyond

The history of institutionalized remote viewing begins in 1972 at Stanford Research Institute (SRI) in Menlo Park, California. Physicists Russell Targ and Hal Puthoff began investigating claims of psychic ability, partly motivated by reports that the Soviet Union was investing heavily in psychotronic research. The CIA funded their initial work.

Early SRI experiments used a simple protocol. A group of people drove to a randomly selected location in the San Francisco Bay Area. Back at the laboratory, a subject (often Ingo Swann or Pat Price) attempted to describe or sketch what those distant people were seeing. Results in some sessions were striking enough that funding continued and expanded.

Over the following two decades, the program evolved through several names and organizational homes: GONDOLA WISH, GRILL FLAME, CENTER LANE, SUN STREAK, and finally STARGATE, which became the umbrella name by which the entire program is now known. By the 1980s, the Defense Intelligence Agency had taken over management and the program employed a small team of trained operational viewers who provided intelligence to various agencies.

Operational tasking included attempts to describe Soviet military facilities, locate missing persons and hostages, and gather information on weapons programs. The quality of results was uneven. Some sessions produced detailed accurate descriptions; others were vague or wrong. The program operated under constant internal skepticism from intelligence officials who doubted its reliability for actionable intelligence.

In 1995, the CIA commissioned an independent review of the program. The American Institutes for Research (AIR) evaluated the accumulated research and concluded that while the statistical evidence for remote viewing effects was real, the program had not demonstrated sufficient operational utility to justify continuation. The CIA terminated STARGATE and declassified thousands of documents, which are now available through the CIA's online reading room.

The declassified records sparked enormous public interest. Former operational viewers like Joseph McMoneagle, Paul H. Smith, and Lyn Buchanan went on to write books, establish training programs, and found the International Remote Viewing Association (IRVA), which continues to publish research and hold annual conferences.

How Controlled Remote Viewing Works

Controlled Remote Viewing (CRV) is the most widely taught remote viewing protocol. Ingo Swann developed it at SRI in collaboration with Hal Puthoff. The protocol was later refined and documented by STARGATE trainer Tom McNear and further systematized by Paul H. Smith, whose book Remote Viewing: The Complete User's Manual for Coordinate Remote Viewing remains a standard reference.

CRV divides a remote viewing session into numbered stages, each progressively deeper and more structured. The discipline of moving through stages in order is designed to prevent the viewer's analytical mind from jumping to conclusions before raw data has been recorded.

Stage 1 begins with the viewer drawing an ideogram, a rapid automatic motion of the pen in response to the target's coordinates. The ideogram is a physical gestural response, not a drawing. The viewer then records the immediate feeling response to that motion, using standard categories such as "land," "water," "structure," "subject," or "energy." Stage 1 is deliberately simple, providing just an initial contact with the target.

Stage 2 develops sensory data. The viewer writes down impressions in five sensory channels: visual (colors, light quality), auditory (sounds, silence), olfactory (smells), gustatory (tastes), and tactile/kinesthetic (textures, temperatures, movement). Each impression is recorded briefly without interpretation. Sketching basic shapes often occurs in Stage 2 as well.

Stage 3 addresses dimensional data. The viewer attempts to capture the spatial relationships and geometry of the target: height, width, depth, open or enclosed spaces, the relationship between elements. Rough dimensional sketches are encouraged.

Stage 4 opens into conceptual and emotional data. Here the viewer can record more abstract impressions: the "feel" or atmosphere of the target, emotional tones present, activities, purposes, and functions. AOL (analytical overlay) signals are identified and labeled separately in a dedicated AOL column so they do not contaminate the raw data column.

Stages 5 and 6 allow for more structured analysis, three-dimensional sketching, and modeling of the target. Stage 6 often produces the most visually impressive output, as viewers construct detailed sketches and written descriptions that can be directly compared to actual target photographs.

Key Figures in Remote Viewing History

Remote viewing's development is inseparable from a handful of individuals whose work shaped both the practice and its public understanding.

Ingo Swann (1933-2013) was a New York artist who became the most important figure in remote viewing's development. He coined the term "remote viewing" itself, developed the CRV protocol, and demonstrated abilities in early SRI experiments compelling enough to secure ongoing funding. His work on coordinate-based viewing gave the program a repeatable structure. His books, particularly Natural ESP and Penetration, offer detailed accounts of his experiences and theories.

Russell Targ is a physicist and laser pioneer who co-founded the SRI remote viewing research program with Hal Puthoff. Targ has been an outspoken advocate for the reality of psychic functioning and has continued publishing and lecturing on the subject after STARGATE's declassification. His book The Reality of ESP presents the experimental evidence from SRI and argues for the genuineness of psychic perception.

Hal Puthoff is a physicist who collaborated with Targ at SRI and later became a consultant on various consciousness research projects. Puthoff's theoretical work attempted to provide a physical basis for remote viewing in terms of quantum mechanics and zero-point energy, though these theories remain outside the scientific mainstream.

Joseph McMoneagle was one of the most highly rated operational remote viewers in the STARGATE program. After the program closed, he established Cognitive Sciences Laboratory and continued working with scientists at Stanford. His book Mind Trek is a detailed account of his experiences as an intelligence viewer and his perspective on the phenomenon.

Paul H. Smith was a STARGATE military viewer who became a primary teacher of CRV. He wrote the definitive user's manual on CRV methodology and founded the International Remote Viewing Association. His work has been central to preserving and transmitting the protocols developed inside the government program.

The Science Debate: Evidence and Skepticism

The scientific status of remote viewing is genuinely complicated, and honest engagement requires looking at both the positive findings and the serious criticisms.

On the positive side, meta-analyses of controlled remote viewing experiments have found statistically significant effects above chance. Parapsychologist Jessica Utts, who was part of the AIR review team in 1995, concluded that the statistical evidence for remote viewing effects was real and that the effect sizes were comparable to other phenomena that have been accepted in psychology. Her fellow reviewer, psychologist Ray Hyman, disputed her interpretation while acknowledging the statistics were puzzling.

Studies by Dean Radin at the Institute of Noetic Sciences and earlier work at Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (PEAR) have also found small but statistically significant effects in related experiments. These findings are published in peer-reviewed parapsychology journals and some mainstream venues.

The skeptical case rests on several points. First, effect sizes are small and inconsistent. The same viewer who produces stunning accuracy in one session may produce near-random results in the next, making reliable operational use difficult. Second, replication by independent researchers with rigorous methodology has been inconsistent. Third, critics argue that positive results may reflect methodological flaws, including inadequate blinding, unintentional cuing, and file-drawer effects (unpublished negative results).

How to Start Learning Remote Viewing

Learning remote viewing requires time, patience, and a willingness to keep records honestly even when results are disappointing. The most common mistake beginners make is selective memory, remembering the hits and forgetting the misses. Formal training protocols prevent this by recording everything before the target is revealed.

Start with the protocol, not the results. Read at least one systematic guide to CRV methodology before attempting sessions. Paul H. Smith's book is the most complete. Free resources from IRVA and transcripts from former STARGATE program members also provide reliable protocol guidance.

Use a target pool. Create or access a pool of numbered targets, photographs or descriptions assigned to random numbers, so you can practice with blind targeting. Several remote viewing associations and websites maintain free target pools for practice.

Keep a session journal. Date each session, record the target coordinate, write your impressions stage by stage, then reveal the target and record your accuracy assessment. Over time, patterns emerge that are far more informative than any single session.

Recognize and label AOL. Analytical overlay is the primary obstacle for beginners. When you notice yourself imagining or guessing, write "AOL" and the conscious interpretation in a separate column, then return to raw sensory impressions. Training yourself to separate raw data from analysis is the core skill of Stage 2 and 4 work.

Practice without agenda. Approaching sessions with the expectation of dramatic hits creates exactly the psychological pressure that produces AOL. Consistent, undramatic practice builds the quiet receptivity that underlies accurate remote viewing more reliably than effort and intention.

Formal training courses are available from several STARGATE alumni and their organizations. These range from weekend intensives to longer distance learning programs. Given the variation in instructor quality, looking for teachers with documented STARGATE backgrounds or credentialed research histories is advisable.

Remote Viewing vs. Astral Projection

Remote viewing and astral projection are frequently confused, partly because both involve perception of distant places and partly because they share some superficial language about consciousness and non-local perception. They are, however, quite different practices with different histories, methodologies, and phenomenologies.

Remote viewing is a protocol-driven skill developed in a scientific context. The viewer remains physically present, eyes open or closed, writing in a structured format. There is no altered state requirement; CRV is specifically designed to be practiced in ordinary waking consciousness. The viewer does not experience themselves as traveling anywhere. They receive impressions at their desk and record them.

Astral projection, also called out-of-body experience (OBE) when it occurs spontaneously, is the subjective experience of consciousness leaving the physical body. Practitioners describe moving through space in a subtle or etheric body, visiting locations, sometimes interacting with other entities or consciousness. The experience is vivid and often profoundly disorienting. It typically requires an altered state, whether through meditation, hypnagogia (the threshold between waking and sleep), or deliberate induction techniques.

Some practitioners do both, and some theorize that the two practices access overlapping or related phenomena through different entry points. Ingo Swann himself wrote about spontaneous out-of-body experiences, and Robert Monroe, who systematized astral projection research at The Monroe Institute, also engaged with remote viewing research. The practices are distinct, however, and conflating them creates confusion about what each actually involves.

The Spiritual Dimension of Remote Viewing

Remote viewing was developed in a scientific, not a spiritual, framework. The original SRI researchers and the STARGATE program managers were physicists, intelligence officers, and psychologists, not mystics. Yet the phenomenon they were investigating touches questions that spiritual traditions have addressed for millennia: Is consciousness local to the brain? Can awareness extend beyond the body? Is there a level of perception that transcends ordinary space and time?

Many of the people who have worked most seriously with remote viewing have found that their practice has led them toward spiritual inquiry. Joseph McMoneagle writes extensively about the ways that sustained remote viewing work affected his sense of personal identity and his understanding of consciousness. Russell Targ has written about the relationship between remote viewing and what he calls the "non-local mind," drawing connections to Buddhist concepts of non-self and to the Perennial Philosophy's account of consciousness.

From a spiritual perspective, remote viewing can be understood as a structured method for accessing what various traditions call the Akashic records, the morphic field, or universal consciousness. The CRV protocol may function as a disciplined way to quiet the analytical mind enough that subtler perceptions can surface, which is not unlike the role of meditation technique in contemplative traditions.

The Thalira perspective on remote viewing situates it within a broader understanding of consciousness as the primary substance of reality, rather than a byproduct of matter. Practices that expand awareness beyond the ordinary sensory field, whether through meditation, breathwork, psychic development, or structured protocols like CRV, all point toward the same fundamental insight: that what you are is larger than what you ordinarily experience yourself to be.

Developing remote viewing ability can therefore be a form of spiritual practice, even when it is pursued in a methodical, protocol-driven way. The discipline of recording impressions without analytical interference develops the same quality of non-attachment to mental content that meditation cultivates. The practice of distinguishing raw perception from interpretation trains a kind of inner discernment that has value far beyond intelligence applications.

Whether approached as psychic research, spiritual development, or both, remote viewing occupies a genuinely interesting position: it is a practice where the demand for rigor and the call to expand beyond ordinary consciousness arrive from the same direction.

Frequently Asked Questions