Old books (Pixabay: jarmoluk)

Jung's Red Book: The Liber Novus and Its Revelations

Updated: April 2026
Last Updated: February 2026, Content reviewed against the Red Book facsimile edition (Shamdasani, W.W. Norton, 2009), Memories Dreams Reflections, and the Black Books.

Quick Answer

Jung's Red Book (Liber Novus) is the large calligraphic manuscript recording his 1913-1930 confrontation with his own unconscious. It was published for the first time in 2009 in a facsimile edition edited by Sonu Shamdasani. Jung considered it the foundation of all his later theoretical work, and it contains the encounters with Philemon, Salome, the Red One, and the Gnostic Sermones ad Mortuos that generated the entire Jungian corpus.

Key Takeaways

  • The authoritative edition: The facsimile edition published by W.W. Norton in 2009, edited by Sonu Shamdasani, is the authoritative text. The "Reader's Edition" (text-only) is a separate publication; neither the images nor the scholarly apparatus of the facsimile should be bypassed for serious engagement with the work.
  • Philemon as the key figure: Jung's dialogues with Philemon, the winged figure who said things Jung had not consciously thought, were the personal experiential basis for the entire Jungian theory of autonomous psychic contents and the collective unconscious.
  • The Sermones ad Mortuos: Written in 1916 and attributed to the ancient Gnostic Basilides, these Seven Sermons to the Dead represent the most explicitly philosophical text in the Red Book and describe the psychic world in a Gnostic cosmological framework that anticipates Jung's later engagement with alchemy and Hermeticism.
  • The theoretical foundation: Jung was explicit that the Red Book period (1913-1919 primarily) was "the most important in my life, in them everything essential was decided." Every major Jungian concept was encountered personally before being theorised.
  • The Hermetic dimension: The Red Book is saturated with Gnostic, Hermetic, and alchemical imagery. Its publication in 2009 revealed the extent to which Jung's later scholarly interests in alchemy and Hermeticism were not academic exercises but personal necessities, attempts to find the conceptual language for experiences already had.

🕑 18 min read

For the first century of Jungian scholarship, the Red Book existed as a rumour. Analysts and historians knew it existed, Jung had hinted at it in his autobiography and in private correspondence, but it remained locked in a bank vault controlled by the Jung family estate, unavailable to anyone outside the innermost circle. The figure who had mapped the interior landscape of the Western psyche had left his own most intimate map unpublished.

When the facsimile edition finally appeared in 2009 (W.W. Norton, edited by the historian of psychology Sonu Shamdasani), the effect on Jungian studies was comparable to what the discovery of the Nag Hammadi Gnostic texts in 1945 had on early Christian studies: a primary document emerged that recontextualised everything that was already known. The Red Book did not invalidate the Collected Works. It explained them, revealed the personal experiential substrate from which the theoretical edifice had been distilled.

To read the Red Book seriously is to understand Jungian psychology in a different key. The concepts that appear dry and systematic in the Collected Works, the archetype, the collective unconscious, the Self, the anima, appear here in their raw, visionary form: as figures who move and speak, as landscapes of terrifying strangeness, as encounters that demanded everything Jung had.

Jung's Red Book Liber Novus showing the illuminated manuscript pages with calligraphy and paintings - Thalira

What the Red Book Is: The Physical and Historical Object

The Red Book is formally titled Liber Novus: The New Book. The title refers to the new spirit, the new attitude toward the psyche, and in some sense the new religion, or at least the new relationship between psychology and the sacred, that Jung believed the confrontation with the unconscious had revealed.

As a physical object, it is a large folio-format book bound in red leather, approximately the size of a family Bible. Jung created it in the manner of a medieval illuminated manuscript: the text is written in calligraphy (two different styles, reflecting two different voices in the narrative), and the pages are illustrated with elaborate paintings that Jung executed himself, showing remarkable artistic skill and drawing on Art Nouveau, medieval illumination, and mandala-like sacred geometry.

The Facsimile vs. the Reader's Edition: A Critical Distinction

The 2009 facsimile edition from W.W. Norton (edited by Sonu Shamdasani) is the authoritative text. It reproduces every page of the Red Book in full colour, at near-original size, with the complete scholarly apparatus: Shamdasani's introduction, extensive footnotes tracing the sources and parallels for every figure and image, and the textual variants. The Reader's Edition, published subsequently, contains only the text without the images. This matters significantly: the Red Book is not a text accompanied by illustrations. It is a unified work in which image and text are inseparable. Working from the Reader's Edition alone is comparable to reading the script of a film without watching the film.

As an Amazon Associate, Thalira earns from qualifying purchases. Book links on this page are affiliate links. Your support helps us continue producing free spiritual research.

The Red Book in its completed sections has three main parts. Liber Primus (The First Book) and Liber Secundus (The Second Book) contain the account of the major active imagination encounters. The third part, Scrutinies, was never completed; it breaks off mid-sentence around 1930. Shamdasani's edition includes the incomplete Scrutinies along with everything Jung had completed.

What Triggered the Red Book Period

The Red Book period began in the immediate aftermath of Jung's definitive break with Freud. The two men had been close since 1907; Freud had designated Jung his "crown prince" and expected him to be the heir and defender of psychoanalysis. The rupture came through the publication of Transformations and Symbols of the Libido (1912, later retitled Symbols of Transformation), in which Jung departed from Freudian orthodoxy on the nature of the libido and the interpretation of mythology. Freud saw the work as a theoretical betrayal; Jung saw it as a necessary extension of the evidence. The personal and professional break was complete by 1913.

The rupture left Jung in a condition he later described with precision: "I was living in a constant state of tension; often I felt as if gigantic blocks of stone were tumbling down upon me. One thunderstorm followed another." He was disoriented professionally and psychically. He had staked his scientific reputation on views that the psychoanalytic establishment now repudiated. He had lost his closest intellectual ally. And he was in the grip of a psychic disturbance that he did not immediately know how to name or contain.

The "Creative Illness" Hypothesis

Henri Ellenberger, in "The Discovery of the Unconscious" (1970), introduced the concept of the "creative illness" to describe the period of psychological crisis through which several of the founders of depth psychology passed before producing their major theoretical contributions. The Red Book period is the paradigm case: a period of intense psychological disturbance that was not pathological but was generative, a confrontation with the deepest layers of the psyche that, navigated consciously, produced a framework for understanding the psyche as a whole. What distinguished Jung's creative illness from psychotic breakdown, in his own analysis, was precisely the ego's capacity to maintain its observer function while engaging the material, rather than being overwhelmed by it.

Jung's response to this condition was characteristically bold and characteristically risky. Rather than seeking to suppress or rationalise what was arising in his psychic life, he deliberately intensified his engagement with it. In December 1913, he sat at his desk and, as he described it in Memories, Dreams, Reflections: "I let myself drop."

From the Black Books to the Red Book

The raw material of the Red Book was first recorded in six black-covered notebooks that Jung called the Black Books. These were his diaries of the active imagination sessions: the raw transcripts of what was said and seen, written in ordinary handwriting, often in the present tense as the events were occurring. The Black Books cover the period 1913 to approximately 1932.

The Red Book itself represents a second-order processing of this material. Working from the Black Books, Jung selected, revised, and expanded the material and transferred it into the Red Book's calligraphic format, accompanied by the elaborate painted illustrations. This was not a quick process: he began the calligraphic work in the late 1910s, and the manuscript was still in process during the 1920s.

Shamdasani's editorial work traced the relationship between the Black Books and the Red Book carefully, noting where Jung had revised, expanded, or reordered the material in the transfer. The Black Books themselves were published in a separate scholarly edition in 2020, making the raw source material available to researchers for the first time.

Philemon: The Central Figure

The figure who dominates the later portion of the Red Book active imaginations is Philemon. He arrived in a dream that Jung described in Memories, Dreams, Reflections: "There was a blue sky, like the sea, covered not by clouds but by flat brown clods of earth. It looked as if the clods were breaking apart and the blue water of the sea were becoming visible between them. But the water was the blue sky. Suddenly there appeared from the right a winged being sailing across the sky. I saw that it was an old man with the horns of a bull. He held a bunch of four keys, one of which he clutched as if he were about to open a lock. He had the wings of the kingfisher with its characteristic colours."

Why Philemon Was Decisive

What made Philemon decisive for Jung's theoretical development was his radical autonomy. In his conversations with Philemon, Jung found that the figure said things he had not consciously thought, held positions he had not consciously adopted, and corrected what he considered his own errors with a superior insight. In Memories, Dreams, Reflections, Jung wrote: "Philemon represented a force which was not myself. In my fantasies I held conversations with him, and he said things which I had not consciously thought. I observed clearly that it was he who spoke, not I." This experience was the personal basis for the theoretical concept of the autonomous complex, the independent activity of psychic contents that do not belong to the ego, and ultimately for the concept of the collective unconscious as a layer of genuinely other psychic material.

Jung painted Philemon multiple times in the Red Book, in elaborately detailed images that draw on medieval illumination techniques and show the figure in characteristic postures. The image of Philemon became, for Jung, a kind of icon of the interior guide, the psychic content that exceeds the ego's capacity and can therefore lead it further than the ego could go alone.

Philemon as the central figure in Jung's Red Book active imagination encounters - Thalira

Salome, the Red One, and Izdubar

Philemon did not appear until partway through the Red Book. The first major figures Jung encountered in the December 1913 active imagination were Elijah (a dignified, old, wise figure) and Salome (a young blind woman). These two appeared together, with a large black serpent.

Salome puzzled Jung immediately because he found her troubling. She was blind, and blindness in dreams typically indicates a refusal to see, a limitation of insight. She also claimed to be the daughter of Herod and expressed love for Jung in a way that felt inappropriate and almost incestuous. She was, in retrospect, an early manifestation of the anima in its unconscious, possessive state: the contrasexual figure before it had been developed toward wisdom.

Elijah was a different matter. He was clearly a figure of wisdom, the great Old Testament prophet who had challenged the gods and survived in the wilderness, who was said to be alive and who would return at the end of time. He represented the positive potential of the animus at its highest development: the guide, the teacher, the bearer of divine communication. Over the course of the Red Book, Elijah transmuted into Philemon, the wisdom figure in a form more appropriate to Jung's personal psychology and his contemporary context.

The Red One: The Problem of Evil in the Red Book

The Red One is one of the most philosophically significant figures in the Red Book. He appears as a red-cloaked man, explicitly associated with the devil and with a Dionysian, anti-Christian energy. In his conversations with Jung, the Red One challenges the spiritual framework that the Christian tradition had imposed: he represents the vitalistic, earthly, dark energy that Christian asceticism had suppressed and that Jung's own psychological development required him to acknowledge. The Red One and the Christ figure represent the two poles of the problem of evil and opposites that dominated Jung's later work, particularly in "Answer to Job" (CW 11). The tension between them could not be resolved by choosing one over the other; it required the development of a psychology large enough to contain both.

Izdubar is among the most philosophically ambitious figures in the Red Book. Jung's rendering of Gilgamesh as Izdubar arrives as a colossus, an enormous ancient divine being who has been struck ill by modernity, by the claims of science and rationalism that have made the ancient gods seem impossible. Jung's response is remarkable: he cannot restore the god's health by returning to a pre-modern worldview, so instead he shrinks the god to a manageable size and carries him within his own psyche, promising to provide new conditions in which the god can be reborn. This extraordinary sequence is one of the most direct engagements in the Red Book with the theological problem of modernity: how ancient religious energies survive contact with a world that can no longer literally believe in them.

The Sermones ad Mortuos

The Sermones ad Mortuos (Seven Sermons to the Dead) were written by Jung in 1916, during the Red Book period, and attributed in the text itself to "Basilides of Alexandria", an actual second-century Gnostic teacher whose work is otherwise known only in fragments. The attribution is not a deception but a Jungian gesture: the text is presented as a transmission from the ancient Gnostic world, arriving through Jung as its contemporary vehicle.

The framework of the Sermones is explicitly Gnostic. They describe the structure of psychic reality in terms of the Pleroma (the divine fullness, the undifferentiated totality of the godhead from which everything proceeds) and the Creatura (the created world of individual beings, which exists precisely because of its differentiation from the Pleroma). The individual human being is Creatura: defined by difference and distinction, incapable of being absorbed back into the undifferentiated Pleroma without losing the very individuality that constitutes it.

The Gnostic Logic of the Sermones

The Gnostic framework of the Sermones maps directly onto Jung's later psychological framework. The Pleroma corresponds to the collective unconscious in its undifferentiated totality: the vast, transpersonal ground from which all individual psychic contents emerge. The Creatura corresponds to the individual ego and personal psyche: existing by virtue of differentiation, unable to dissolve back into the Pleroma without the loss of individual consciousness. The fundamental task of the human being in this framework is neither to merge with the divine nor to deny it but to maintain the tension of being Creatura while remaining aware of the Pleroma, precisely the position of the individuating ego in relation to the Self.

Jung privately circulated the Sermones among close friends and family in 1916. They were later included in the Red Book. Their Gnostic style and content anticipated the direction of Jung's scholarly interests: alchemy (CW 12-14), Gnosticism (CW 9ii), and the figure of Hermes Trismegistus as the presiding spirit of the entire hermetic enterprise.

The Concealment and the 2009 Publication

Jung completed the calligraphic and illustrated version of the Red Book around 1930 and set it aside. For the remaining 31 years of his life, he never returned to it. He gave no public explanation for his decision not to publish, though in private correspondence he was clear that the material was too personal and too raw for the scientific audience he was addressing in the Collected Works.

After his death in 1961, the Red Book was kept under the control of the Jung family estate. Scholars knew it existed; some had heard descriptions of it; a few had been permitted brief glimpses. But access was refused for decades, leaving an extraordinary gap at the centre of Jungian scholarship.

The negotiations that eventually led to publication were protracted. Sonu Shamdasani, who had been working on the Jung archive with the cooperation of the Heirs Foundation, played a central role in persuading the family that publication was both historically necessary and appropriately respectful of Jung's legacy. The agreement included the scholarly apparatus that Shamdasani provided: the introduction, the footnotes, and the careful contextualisation of every figure and image in the text.

The 2009 publication was a major cultural event. The facsimile edition was expensive, large, and technically demanding to produce. It nonetheless sold widely and attracted attention far beyond the specialist readership of Jungian psychology, partly because the visual beauty of the manuscript was accessible to anyone, and partly because the story of its concealment had the quality of a legend.

Why Jung Called It the Foundation of All His Work

In a 1957 letter to a young theologian named John Layard, Jung wrote what remains the most direct statement of the Red Book's relationship to his theoretical work: "The years when I was pursuing my inner images were the most important in my life, in them everything essential was decided. It all began then; the later details are only supplements and clarifications of the material that burst forth from the unconscious, and at first swamped me. It was the prima materia for a lifetime's work."

This is a claim of extraordinary scope. It means that the concepts for which Jung is known, the collective unconscious, the archetype, the individuation process, the anima and animus, the Self, active imagination, the shadow, the persona, were not derived from academic study or from clinical observation of patients alone. They were first encountered personally, experientially, in the confrontation with the unconscious that the Red Book records. The theoretical work was the intellectual containment of the visionary experience.

Theory as Personal Testimony

This relationship between personal experience and theoretical formulation is not unusual in the history of ideas: philosophers and scientists have regularly theorised from experience. What is unusual in Jung's case is the degree to which the personal experience preceded the theory and retained its priority in Jung's own evaluation of his work. The Collected Works, for all their scholarly apparatus, are best understood not as the definitive statement of a psychological system but as the conceptual distillation of an ongoing personal encounter with the depths of the psyche, an encounter whose primary record is the Red Book.

The specific connections are traceable. The Philemon dialogues generated the concept of the autonomous psychic content and the collective unconscious. The encounter with Salome generated the anima theory. The Izdubar sequence generated the concept of the psychoid archetype (the archetype with its foot in physical reality). The Sermones generated the framework of the Pleroma and Creatura that later became the ego-Self distinction. The mandala paintings that appear throughout the Red Book generated the theory of the Self as the centre of the total psyche and its symbolism in circular forms.

The Hermetic and Gnostic Dimension

One of the most significant revelations of the 2009 publication was the full extent of the Red Book's Hermetic and Gnostic dimension. Jung's scholarly interests in alchemy (beginning in the late 1920s, developed through the 1930s-1950s) and in Gnosticism have sometimes been presented as late additions to his thinking, products of academic curiosity about marginal traditions. The Red Book reveals them as personal necessities: attempts to find the intellectual and symbolic language for experiences already had.

The Sermones' explicitly Gnostic framework is the most obvious case. But the entire Red Book is saturated with imagery from the Hermetic and Neoplatonic tradition: the figure of the winged Hermes (closely related to Philemon), the concept of the world-soul that underlies the active imagination figures, the tension between the material and spiritual that the alchemical tradition describes as the opus.

Hermes Trismegistus as the presiding spirit of the entire hermetic enterprise is the outer form of what Philemon represents as an inner figure: the guide between worlds, the messenger of the gods, the interpreter of the divine language that the psyche speaks in dreams, visions, and active imagination. Jung's later scholarly engagement with alchemy and Hermeticism was his attempt to show that this language had been understood, in its own terms, by the tradition he was now engaging psychologically.

The Hermetic Synthesis Course traces precisely this thread: from the ancient Hermetic sources, through the alchemical tradition's projection of psychological operations onto matter, through the Red Book period's personal encounter with those operations, to the theoretical framework of Jungian depth psychology as the modern articulation of an ancient wisdom.

The Document Behind the System

The Red Book reminds us that Jungian psychology did not begin in a consulting room or a lecture hall. It began in a single person's willingness to take seriously what was arising in the depths of his own psyche, to not dismiss it as pathology, to not reduce it to prior theories, and to engage it with the full resources of his intelligence, his artistic capacity, and his moral seriousness. The theoretical framework that emerged from that willingness is now one of the most comprehensive psychologies of the human interior ever produced. But the document behind it is a man talking to figures in the dark and trying, with extraordinary courage, to understand what they are telling him.

Frequently Asked Questions

Get This Book

The Red Book: Liber Novus by C.G. Jung

View on Amazon

Affiliate link, your purchase supports Thalira at no extra cost.

What is Jung's Red Book?

Jung's Red Book, formally titled Liber Novus (The New Book), is a large calligraphic and illustrated manuscript recording Jung's confrontation with his own unconscious between 1913 and 1930. It contains accounts of active imagination sessions, dialogues with inner figures (including Philemon, Salome, and the Red One), and elaborate paintings in a medieval illuminated manuscript style. It was published for the first time in 2009 in a facsimile edition edited by Sonu Shamdasani (W.W. Norton).

Why did Jung keep the Red Book secret?

Jung's reasons were complex. The material was intensely personal and visionary in a way that he knew would be difficult for the scientific community to accept. He was also uncertain about its status: art, prophecy, pathology, or clinical data? The decision to publish ultimately came from the Jung Heirs Foundation after negotiations with scholar Sonu Shamdasani, decades after Jung's death in 1961.

What is the difference between the Red Book facsimile and the Reader's Edition?

The facsimile edition (W.W. Norton, 2009) is the authoritative text: it reproduces the Red Book at near-original size in full colour, with Shamdasani's extensive scholarly introduction and footnotes. The Reader's Edition is a smaller, text-only publication containing none of the illustrations. Since the Red Book's images and text are inseparable, the facsimile is essential for serious engagement with the work.

Who is Philemon and what was his significance to Jung?

Philemon was the central figure in Jung's active imagination during the Red Book period: a winged old man with bull's horns carrying keys. Jung drew and painted him and held extended inner dialogues with him. What made Philemon significant was his autonomy, he said things Jung had not consciously thought, representing superior insight. The Philemon encounters were the personal basis for the Jungian theory of autonomous psychic contents in the collective unconscious.

What are the Sermones ad Mortuos?

The Seven Sermons to the Dead are a Gnostic text Jung wrote in 1916, attributed to Basilides of Alexandria. They describe the psychic world in Gnostic terms: the Pleroma (the undifferentiated divine fullness), the Creatura (the individual created being), and the principles of opposites. They are the most explicitly philosophical text in the Red Book and directly anticipate Jung's later scholarly engagement with Gnosticism and alchemy.

What triggered the Red Book period?

The Red Book period was triggered by the rupture of Jung's relationship with Freud in 1912-1913, following the publication of "Symbols of Transformation." The professional and personal break left Jung in a period of intense psychological disturbance that he called a "creative illness." He responded by deliberately confronting what was arising in his own unconscious, beginning the systematic active imagination practice recorded in the Red Book.

How long did Jung work on the Red Book?

The underlying psychological experience spanned approximately 1913-1919. Jung began transferring material into the Red Book's calligraphic format in the late 1910s and continued through the 1920s, setting the manuscript aside around 1930 with the final section ("Scrutinies") incomplete. He lived for another 31 years, during which all his major theoretical works were produced.

What is Sonu Shamdasani's contribution to the Red Book's publication?

Sonu Shamdasani, historian of psychology at University College London and the world's leading Jung scholar, edited the 2009 facsimile edition. His extensive scholarly introduction and footnotes, tracing sources, parallels, and the relationship between the Black Books and the Red Book, constitute the primary secondary account of the work's origins and significance. His contribution was decisive in persuading the Jung family estate to publish.

What is the Red One in the Red Book?

The Red One is a red-cloaked figure associated with the devil and Dionysian energy. He represents the opposite of the Christ figure that also appears in the Red Book and embodies the vitalistic, earthly, pagan energy that Christianity had suppressed. The tension between the Red One and Christ is part of Jung's sustained engagement with the problem of evil and opposites, developed later in "Answer to Job."

Why did Jung say the Red Book contained the origins of all his theoretical work?

In a 1957 letter, Jung wrote that the Red Book years were "the most important in my life, in them everything essential was decided. It all began then; the later details are only supplements and clarifications." Every major Jungian concept, archetype, collective unconscious, individuation, anima/animus, Self, was encountered personally in the Red Book period before being theorised in the Collected Works.

Is the Red Book a work of art, psychology, or spirituality?

The Red Book defies categorisation. As a physical object it is a work of art: the calligraphy and paintings show extraordinary skill. As a psychological record it is primary clinical data for the Jungian framework. As a spiritual text it has structural parallels with Gnostic gospels, Tibetan sacred texts, and Dante's Commedia. Shamdasani's scholarly apparatus places it in all these contexts without reducing it to any one.

What is the Izdubar figure in the Red Book?

Izdubar is Jung's rendering of Gilgamesh, the hero of ancient Mesopotamian mythology. In the Red Book, Izdubar appears as a colossus, a giant figure of ancient power. Jung encounters him and finds that Izdubar has been struck ill by the claims of modern science and rationalism. Jung's response is to 'shrink' the god and carry him in his own psyche — protecting him until the god can be reborn in a new form appropriate to the modern world. The Izdubar sequence is one of the most philosophically rich sections of the Red Book, engaging the question of how ancient religious and mythological realities survive contact with modernity.

Sources & References

  • Jung, C.G. (2009). The Red Book: Liber Novus. Ed. Sonu Shamdasani. W.W. Norton.
  • Jung, C.G. (1963). Memories, Dreams, Reflections. Pantheon Books.
  • Jung, C.G. (1956). Symbols of Transformation (Collected Works, Vol. 5). Princeton University Press.
  • Shamdasani, S. (2009). "Introduction." In Jung, C.G., The Red Book: Liber Novus. W.W. Norton.
  • Jung, C.G. (2020). The Black Books: 1913-1932. Ed. Sonu Shamdasani. W.W. Norton.
  • Ellenberger, H.F. (1970). The Discovery of the Unconscious: The History and Evolution of Dynamic Psychiatry. Basic Books.
  • Rowland, S. (2010). Jung: A Feminist Revision. Polity Press.
  • Huskinson, L. (Ed.). (2008). Dreaming the Myth Onwards: New Directions in Jungian Therapy and Thought. Routledge.
Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.