In Search of the Miraculous by Ouspensky: Gurdjieff's Teaching

Ouspensky and Gurdjieff

Pyotr Demianovich Ouspensky was born in Moscow in 1878. He was a mathematician by training, a journalist by profession, and a seeker by temperament. Before meeting Gurdjieff, he had already published Tertium Organum (1912), a work on higher dimensions of consciousness that had brought him recognition in Russian intellectual circles. He had traveled to India and Ceylon searching for esoteric schools and had returned disappointed, concluding that the East held no living teaching that went beyond what he had already found in books.

George Ivanovich Gurdjieff was born around 1866 (the exact date is uncertain) in Alexandropol, in the Caucasus region of the Russian Empire, to a Greek father and an Armenian mother. He claimed to have spent his youth and early adulthood traveling across Central Asia, the Middle East, and North Africa, seeking out and studying with esoteric schools of various traditions. The details of these travels are described in his own book, Meetings with Remarkable Men, but the historical accuracy of that account is debated. What is clear is that Gurdjieff arrived in Moscow around 1912 with a complete and original system of ideas and practices that drew on Sufi, Christian, Buddhist, and possibly pre-Islamic Central Asian sources.

Ouspensky met Gurdjieff in Moscow in 1915. The meeting is described in the opening chapters of In Search of the Miraculous with the journalist's eye for telling detail. Ouspensky was impressed immediately. Here was a man who did not merely talk about higher consciousness but appeared to possess it, who did not offer vague spiritual encouragement but presented a precise, interconnected system of cosmology, psychology, and practice. Ouspensky recognized that he had found what his travels to India had failed to provide: a living school.

The years 1915-1918 form the core of the book. Ouspensky attended Gurdjieff's lectures, participated in his groups, and recorded the teaching with the precision of a trained journalist and the comprehension of a trained mathematician. The result is In Search of the Miraculous, which Gurdjieff himself approved as an accurate account before its posthumous publication in 1949 (Ouspensky had died in 1947, Gurdjieff in 1949).

The Central Thesis: Humans Are Asleep

The foundation of Gurdjieff's teaching, as Ouspensky presents it, is a single proposition: human beings are not conscious. They believe themselves to be awake, to make decisions, to act deliberately, to possess a unified self. They are wrong on every count. What passes for consciousness in ordinary life is a form of sleep with dreams: a continuous stream of automatic associations, mechanical reactions, and borrowed opinions that creates the illusion of wakefulness.

"Man is a machine," Gurdjieff told his students. "All his deeds, actions, words, thoughts, feelings, convictions, opinions, and habits are the results of external influences, external impressions." This is not a metaphor. Gurdjieff meant it literally. He demonstrated it practically by asking students to observe themselves and notice how their actions, thoughts, and emotions arose mechanically, without any conscious direction. The observation is devastating when honestly carried out. You notice that you did not decide to have the thought that just crossed your mind. You did not choose to feel irritated by the remark someone made. You did not deliberately adopt the opinion you are defending so vigorously. These things happened in you, like digestion or blood circulation, with no participation from anything that could genuinely be called "I."

This analysis is not intended to produce despair. It is intended to produce a shock that makes genuine work possible. If you already believe yourself to be conscious, you will make no effort to become conscious. If you believe you already possess will, you will make no effort to develop will. The recognition of one's own mechanicalness is, paradoxically, the first conscious act. It creates the possibility of something different.

The concept of "sleep" in Gurdjieff's system is precise. He distinguished four states of consciousness: ordinary sleep (in bed, dreaming), waking sleep (the state in which most people spend their lives, mechanical and identified), self-remembering (the third state, in which one is simultaneously aware of oneself and the external world), and objective consciousness (the fourth state, genuine awakening, full awareness of reality as it is). Most people never move beyond the second state. The entire purpose of the Work is to make the third state, and eventually the fourth, accessible through sustained practice.

Self-Remembering: The Practice

Self-remembering is the central practice of the Fourth Way, and Ouspensky's account of its discovery is one of the most honest passages in the literature of spiritual practice. Gurdjieff introduced the concept simply: "When you become aware of yourself, you remember yourself." Ouspensky tried it and was immediately confronted with the fact that he could not sustain the effort for more than a few seconds at a time. The awareness flickered, the attention was pulled away by a thought or a sensation, and the moment of self-remembering was gone.

This is the universal experience. Every practitioner who attempts self-remembering discovers immediately that they cannot do it for more than brief flashes. The attention is not strong enough. The mechanical habits of identification (losing oneself in whatever is happening) reassert themselves within seconds. The practice is simple to describe and extraordinarily difficult to sustain.

Ouspensky describes his own attempts with characteristic honesty. He found that self-remembering altered his experience of the world. Colors became more vivid. Sounds became more distinct. His emotional reactions were observed rather than blindly enacted. The quality of consciousness changed. But the effort required was immense, and the duration was always brief. He could sustain the state for minutes at most before sliding back into mechanical functioning.

Gurdjieff taught that self-remembering was not merely a meditation exercise but a way of living. The practitioner was to attempt it during ordinary activities: walking down the street, having a conversation, eating dinner, doing physical work. The point was not to retreat into a meditative state but to bring awareness into the midst of everyday life. This is the practical meaning of the Fourth Way: development in life, not in retreat from life.

The relationship between self-remembering and the Hermetic tradition is significant. The Hermetic injunction "Know Thyself" (inscribed at Delphi and central to the entire tradition from the Corpus Hermeticum onward) finds its most practical expression in Gurdjieff's self-remembering. It is not self-knowledge as information (knowing your personality type, your psychological history, your preferences). It is self-knowledge as direct awareness: knowing that you exist, right now, in this moment, as a conscious presence.

The Fourth Way

Gurdjieff described three traditional paths of development, each working primarily through one of the three main functions of the human organism. The Way of the Fakir works through the body: the fakir develops will through physical ordeals, sitting motionless for years, enduring pain, forcing the body into submission. The result is an extraordinary physical will, but the emotional and intellectual functions remain undeveloped. The Way of the Monk works through the emotions: the monk develops through faith, devotion, prayer, and religious feeling. The result is emotional mastery, but the body and intellect may remain weak. The Way of the Yogi works through the mind: the yogi develops through knowledge, study, and intellectual comprehension. The result is intellectual mastery, but the body and emotions may be neglected.

Each of these paths is genuine but incomplete. The fakir has will without understanding. The monk has feeling without knowledge. The yogi has knowledge without the will to act on it. Each must eventually go back and develop the functions they neglected, which is why these traditional paths take so long (often lifetimes, in the systems that acknowledge reincarnation).

The Fourth Way works on all three functions simultaneously. The practitioner does not retreat to a monastery or a cave. They remain in ordinary life, using the conditions of daily existence (work, relationships, difficulties, boredom) as the material for development. The method is self-observation and self-remembering, practiced continuously, combined with specific exercises for the body (Gurdjieff's Movements, a form of sacred dance) and the emotions (intentional suffering, conscious labor).

The Fourth Way has one absolute requirement: it cannot be practiced alone. It requires a school and a teacher. The reason is practical. The mechanical habits that keep a person asleep are invisible to the person themselves (that is what makes them mechanical). A teacher and a group of fellow students provide the external friction, the unexpected challenges, and the honest feedback that the practitioner cannot generate alone. This is why Gurdjieff emphasized group work, communal living, and the relationship between teacher and student as essential to the Fourth Way.

The Ray of Creation

Gurdjieff's cosmology, as presented by Ouspensky, is detailed and precise. The Ray of Creation describes the structure of the universe as a descending series of levels, each operating under an increasing number of cosmic laws. At the top is the Absolute (one law: its own will). Below that is All Worlds (3 laws), then All Suns (6 laws), then Our Sun (12 laws), then All Planets (24 laws), then Earth (48 laws), then Moon (96 laws).

The significance of this model for practical work is direct. Humans on Earth live under 48 laws. These include physical laws (gravity, thermodynamics), biological laws (hunger, sleep, reproduction), and psychological laws (identification, imagination, self-calming). The work of development is to come under fewer laws by rising to a higher level within the Ray of Creation. A person who achieves self-remembering (the third state of consciousness) comes under 24 laws rather than 48. A person who achieves objective consciousness (the fourth state) comes under 12 laws. Each step upward means greater freedom, greater consciousness, and fewer mechanical constraints.

Whether one accepts this cosmology literally or reads it as a symbolic description of the human condition (we are bound by mechanical laws; consciousness liberates us; unconscious suffering feeds something that does not have our interests at heart), the practical implications are identical. The more mechanical you are, the more you serve purposes that are not your own. The more conscious you become, the more you serve your own legitimate aim and, by extension, the aims of levels above you in the cosmic hierarchy.

The Law of Three

The Law of Three states that every phenomenon requires three forces for its manifestation: an active (affirming) force, a passive (denying) force, and a neutralizing (reconciling) force. Ordinary thinking is binary: we see cause and effect, action and reaction, thesis and antithesis. We miss the third force because we have no conceptual framework for perceiving it.

Gurdjieff's examples are practical. A person wants to change their behavior (active force). Their habitual patterns resist the change (passive force). The change cannot happen until a third force enters: a teacher's instruction, a life shock, a new understanding, or a concentrated effort of a specific kind. Without the third force, the first two simply oppose each other and nothing new emerges. This is why good intentions alone do not produce change, why willpower alone is insufficient, and why people who are stuck remain stuck despite wanting to be free.

The Law of Three is represented in the Enneagram by the inner triangle (points 3, 6, 9), and it corresponds to numerous triadic structures in other traditions: the Hindu Trimurti (Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva), the Christian Trinity, the alchemical triad of Sulphur, Mercury, and Salt, and the Hegelian dialectic of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. Gurdjieff's formulation is distinctive in its emphasis on the practical invisibility of the third force and in its insistence that learning to perceive the third force is itself a form of conscious development.

The Law of Seven (The Octave)

The Law of Seven (also called the Law of Octaves) states that all processes develop in seven stages, following the pattern of the musical scale. Gurdjieff mapped processes onto the notes do-re-mi-fa-sol-la-si-do. The critical feature of this model is that there are two places in every octave where the development does not proceed smoothly: between mi and fa, and between si and the next do. At these "intervals," the process naturally slows, deviates, or reverses unless an additional force (a "shock") is applied from outside the process itself.

This law explains a phenomenon everyone recognizes: projects start with enthusiasm, proceed for a while, and then lose direction. Diets work for two weeks and then fail. New Year's resolutions fade by February. Relationships begin with intensity and drift into routine. In each case, the process has reached an interval where the original momentum is insufficient to carry it forward. Without a conscious shock at the interval, the process either stops or deviates into something quite different from what was intended.

The Law of Seven applies to inner development as well. A student begins the Work with enthusiasm (do). They practice self-observation and make initial discoveries about their mechanicalness (re, mi). Then they hit the first interval: the initial shock of self-observation wears off, the practice becomes routine, and the old mechanical habits reassert themselves. Without a conscious shock (a new exercise, a teacher's intervention, a deliberate increase in effort), the student's work degenerates into comfortable self-reflection, which is merely another form of sleep with a spiritual vocabulary attached to it.

The Enneagram: Process, Not Personality

The Enneagram is one of the most misunderstood symbols in modern spiritual culture, and Ouspensky's account is the corrective. In Gurdjieff's teaching, the Enneagram is a process diagram. It is a nine-pointed figure inscribed in a circle, combining two patterns: a triangle (connecting points 3, 6, and 9) and an irregular hexad (connecting points 1, 4, 2, 8, 5, and 7, in that order). The triangle represents the Law of Three. The hexad represents the Law of Seven. Together, they map the complete structure of any self-sustaining process.

The Enneagram in Gurdjieff's system was used to understand processes: the process of cooking food, the process of refining substances in the human organism, the process of the musical octave, the process of cosmic creation. It is a dynamic symbol, meant to be studied in motion, not as a static diagram. Gurdjieff taught his students to use the Enneagram by assigning the stages of a process to the nine points and then following the movement of the process around the figure, noting where the intervals (shocks) occur and what kind of shock is needed.

The modern "Enneagram of Personality" (the system of nine personality types that has become popular through books, workshops, and apps) was not taught by Gurdjieff. It was developed by Oscar Ichazo in the 1950s and 1960s and further elaborated by Claudio Naranjo in the 1970s. While Ichazo claimed Sufi and Fourth Way influences, the personality typing system is a separate development. Reading Ouspensky's account of how Gurdjieff actually used the Enneagram reveals a tool of far greater depth and range than a personality quiz.

The Centers

Gurdjieff taught that the human organism contains multiple "centers" or "brains," each designed to handle a specific type of function. The main centers are: the intellectual center (thinking, analysis, comparison), the emotional center (feeling, aesthetic perception, religious experience), the moving center (learned physical movement, habits, skills), and the instinctive center (automatic body functions, reflexes, sensory perception, pleasure and pain). There is also a sex center, which Gurdjieff treated as distinct and possessed of its own energy.

In theory, each center should handle its own type of function, using its own energy and operating at its own speed. In practice, the centers constantly interfere with each other. The intellectual center, which is the slowest, tries to do the work of the emotional center (thinking about feelings instead of feeling them). The moving center takes over when the intellectual center should be active (habitual physical responses replacing thought). The emotional center uses the energy of the sex center, producing the characteristic intensity and possessiveness of emotionally identified states.

Each center also has three parts (intellectual, emotional, and moving parts within each center), and each of these parts has three subdivisions, producing a detailed map of human psychology that Ouspensky presents with mathematical precision. The higher emotional center and higher intellectual center exist in every person but are disconnected from ordinary consciousness because the lower centers are in such disorder. The work of development, in this model, is to bring the lower centers into proper functioning so that the higher centers can be heard. This parallels Blavatsky's concept of the "voice of the silence": the higher wisdom is always present but cannot be perceived while the lower functions are in chaos.

The Break Between Teacher and Student

Ouspensky separated from Gurdjieff in 1924. The exact reasons are complex and have been analyzed by students of both teachers for decades. The surface reasons include Gurdjieff's increasingly unpredictable behavior after a near-fatal car accident in 1924, his decision to close the Institute for the Harmonious Development of Man at Fontainebleau, and his shift toward writing (Beelzebub's Tales to His Grandson) as his primary method of transmission.

The deeper reasons are probably temperamental. Ouspensky was a systematizer, a mathematician, a man who valued clarity, consistency, and intellectual order. Gurdjieff was a provocateur, a man who deliberately created confusion, contradiction, and emotional upheaval as pedagogical tools. Ouspensky wanted the system transmitted cleanly and precisely. Gurdjieff believed that the system could not be transmitted through words and ideas alone; it required direct experience, and direct experience required shocks, friction, and the breaking of habitual patterns (including the pattern of wanting everything to be clean and precise).

After the break, Ouspensky continued teaching the system in London, leading groups, giving lectures, and preserving the teaching in as systematic a form as possible. He refused to claim the authority of a teacher in the full Fourth Way sense; he always presented himself as transmitting Gurdjieff's ideas rather than his own. Near the end of his life, in a meeting with his London group in 1947, he reportedly told his students that his own work had failed, that the system he had been teaching was "Gurdjieff's system," and that they should go to Gurdjieff himself. He died shortly afterward. The publication of In Search of the Miraculous was his final act of service to the teaching he had received but felt he had not been able to fully transmit.

Scholarly Reception and Legacy

In Search of the Miraculous has been in continuous print since 1949 and has been translated into dozens of languages. Within the field of Western esotericism, it is recognized as one of the most important texts of the 20th century. James Webb's The Harmonious Circle (1980) provides the most thorough historical and biographical study of Gurdjieff and his students, including Ouspensky. J.G. Bennett's Gurdjieff: Making a New World (1973) offers another student's perspective on the same teaching, with significant differences in emphasis and interpretation.

Maurice Nicoll's Psychological Commentaries on the Teaching of Gurdjieff and Ouspensky (5 volumes, 1952-1956) provides the most detailed secondary exposition of the system. Nicoll, a student of both Ouspensky and Gurdjieff (and previously of Carl Jung), brings a psychological sophistication to the material that complements Ouspensky's mathematical precision. His commentaries are particularly valuable for practitioners because they address the daily practical difficulties of the Work in a way that Ouspensky's more abstract account does not.

The academic reception has grown since the establishment of Western esotericism as a recognized field of study. Scholars at the University of Amsterdam, the University of Exeter, and other institutions have begun to examine the Fourth Way within the broader context of modern esoteric movements. The Fourth Way's relationship to Sufism, to Eastern Orthodox Christianity (particularly the Hesychast tradition of the Jesus Prayer, which closely parallels self-remembering), and to the Hermetic tradition are all areas of active scholarly interest.

Who Should Read It

In Search of the Miraculous is for the reader who suspects that something is wrong with ordinary consciousness. Not wrong with the world, not wrong with other people, but wrong with the quality of one's own awareness. If you have noticed that you make the same mistakes repeatedly despite knowing better, that your resolutions dissolve within days, that you say one thing and do another, that your moods seem to control you rather than the reverse, then this book provides a precise explanation of why, and a practical method for working with the situation.

The book rewards two kinds of reading. The first is a cover-to-cover reading for the overall picture: the narrative of Ouspensky's encounter with Gurdjieff, the gradual unfolding of the system, and the human drama of a brilliant student grappling with a teaching that consistently exceeds his capacity to systematize it. The second is a study reading, returning to specific chapters (the cosmological sections, the discussion of self-remembering, the description of the centers) for detailed work.

Readers who want to practice self-remembering can begin immediately. The exercise requires no preparation, no equipment, and no belief system. Simply attempt to be aware of yourself while you are aware of something else. Notice how quickly the attention is captured. Notice how rare genuine self-awareness is. This single observation, honestly made, is worth more than any amount of reading about spiritual development.

For those interested in the broader context, Bennett's Gurdjieff: Making a New World and Nicoll's Psychological Commentaries are the essential secondary texts. For scholarly analysis, James Webb's The Harmonious Circle remains the standard. For Gurdjieff's own writing (which is deliberately difficult and functions as a different kind of teaching tool), start with Meetings with Remarkable Men rather than Beelzebub's Tales, which is one of the most demanding books in any language.

Frequently Asked Questions