The Guide for the Perplexed by Maimonides: Complete Guide to Reason and Revelation

Overview

The Guide for the Perplexed (Moreh Nevukhim in Hebrew, Dalalat al-Ha'irin in the original Judeo-Arabic) was composed by Moses Maimonides around 1190 CE in Cairo, Egypt. It is addressed to a specific student, Joseph ibn Aknin, but its intended audience is broader: intellectually sophisticated Jews who have studied Aristotelian philosophy and find themselves "perplexed" by the apparent conflict between philosophical conclusions and the teachings of the Torah.

The work occupies a unique position in the history of philosophy. It is simultaneously a work of Jewish theology (interpreting Scripture and defending the Torah's authority), a work of Aristotelian philosophy (applying the methods and concepts of Greek thought to theological questions), and a work of negative theology (arguing that God's nature transcends all positive description). This combination of commitments makes the Guide one of the most intellectually demanding and rewarding texts in the Western philosophical tradition.

The Guide was originally written in Judeo-Arabic (Arabic written in Hebrew characters), the scholarly language of Sephardic Jews in the medieval Islamic world. It was translated into Hebrew by Samuel ibn Tibbon within Maimonides' lifetime, and this Hebrew translation became the version most widely studied in the Jewish world. A Latin translation in the 13th century made the work accessible to Christian scholars, who recognized its importance immediately.

Who Was Maimonides?

Moses ben Maimon, known in the Jewish world by the acronym Rambam and in the wider world as Maimonides (a Grecized form of his name), was born in 1138 CE in Cordoba, the capital of Andalusian Spain, which was at the time one of the great centres of Islamic-Jewish-Christian intellectual exchange.

In 1148, when Maimonides was ten years old, the Almohad dynasty conquered Cordoba and gave the Jewish and Christian communities a choice: convert to Islam, leave, or die. The Maimon family chose to leave, beginning years of wandering through Spain, North Africa, and eventually Palestine before settling in Fustat (Old Cairo), Egypt, around 1165.

In Egypt, Maimonides became both the most important rabbi of his generation and a physician of remarkable skill. He served as personal physician to the court of Sultan Saladin (and his son al-Afdal) while simultaneously leading the Egyptian Jewish community as its nagid (head). His daily schedule, as described in a famous letter, was punishing: he spent the morning seeing patients at the sultan's court, the afternoon attending to Jewish communal affairs and medical patients in his home, and the evening studying and writing. It was during these nighttime hours that he composed the Guide.

Maimonides' other major works include the Mishneh Torah (a comprehensive code of Jewish law, still authoritative), the Commentary on the Mishnah (including the Thirteen Principles of Faith), and numerous medical treatises. He died in 1204 and is buried in Tiberias, Israel, where his tomb remains a site of pilgrimage.

The famous epitaph, "From Moses [the biblical prophet] to Moses [Maimonides], there arose none like Moses," captures the Jewish community's assessment of his stature.

Historical Context

The Guide was written at a specific moment in the history of ideas: the encounter between the Aristotelian philosophical tradition (transmitted to the Islamic world through Arabic translations and commentaries, particularly those of Avicenna and Averroes) and the Jewish legal-theological tradition rooted in the Torah and Talmud.

This encounter produced intellectual ferment and anxiety. Aristotelian philosophy offered powerful tools for understanding the natural world, the structure of reality, and the nature of the divine, but some of its conclusions appeared to contradict Torah teaching. Aristotle argued that the universe is eternal; the Torah says God created it. Aristotle described God as an impersonal "unmoved mover"; the Torah portrays a personal God who speaks, acts, and cares about human affairs. Aristotle's ethics are based on reason; the Torah's commandments claim divine authority regardless of rational justification.

Maimonides' project in the Guide is to resolve these tensions without abandoning either philosophy or Torah. He does this not by choosing one over the other but by showing that, properly understood, they point to the same truth. Where they appear to conflict, either the philosophical argument is flawed, the scriptural passage is being read too literally, or both are being misunderstood.

Who Are the Perplexed?

The "perplexed" in the title are not religious doubters in the modern sense. They are committed Jews who have also studied philosophy and find themselves pulled between two intellectual authorities. They cannot accept Scripture uncritically (because their philosophical training demands rational justification), but they cannot abandon Scripture (because their religious commitment demands obedience to revelation).

Maimonides describes their situation with sympathy: "The object of this treatise is to enlighten a religious man who has been trained to believe in the truth of our holy Law, who conscientiously fulfils his moral and religious duties, and at the same time has been successful in his philosophical studies." Such a person finds that "the literal meaning of the Law" seems to "conflict with the conclusions which he has derived from philosophical reasoning."

This situation, the tension between faith and reason, did not end with the medieval period. It characterizes the experience of many modern religious intellectuals who accept both the authority of their tradition and the findings of science and philosophy. The Guide's enduring relevance lies in its sophisticated attempt to navigate this tension without simplification.

Structure of the Guide

The Guide consists of three parts, each addressing a different set of questions:

Part I (76 chapters): Addresses the nature of God, focusing on two main themes: (1) the interpretation of biblical anthropomorphisms (passages that describe God in human terms: God's "hand," God's "anger," God "walking" in the garden), and (2) the development of negative theology. Maimonides systematically shows that every anthropomorphic passage has a non-literal meaning and that the only truthful statements about God are negations.

Part II (48 chapters): Addresses cosmology and prophecy. Maimonides discusses the structure of the heavens (following Aristotelian-Ptolemaic astronomy), the question of whether the universe was created or is eternal, the nature of angels, and the nature of prophecy. The section on prophecy is particularly significant: Maimonides presents prophecy as the natural result of intellectual and moral perfection, not as an arbitrary divine intervention.

Part III (54 chapters): Addresses the purpose of the Torah's commandments, the nature of evil, divine providence, and the limits of human knowledge. Maimonides provides rational explanations for the commandments (including the sacrificial laws, dietary laws, and ritual purity laws), argues that evil is the privation of good (not a positive substance), and discusses the relationship between God's knowledge and human free will.

The Guide is deliberately difficult and sometimes deliberately obscure. Maimonides explains in the introduction that he has intentionally scattered his arguments, stated some conclusions indirectly, and even contradicted himself in places, so that the Guide's deepest teachings are accessible only to those with the philosophical training to decode them. This esoteric dimension has made the Guide one of the most extensively interpreted texts in the Jewish philosophical tradition.

Negative Theology

Maimonides' negative theology is the most philosophically rigorous treatment of the via negativa in the Jewish tradition and one of the most influential in all of Western philosophy.

The argument proceeds as follows: God is absolutely simple (not composed of parts), absolutely unique (not a member of any category), and absolutely transcendent (not comparable to anything in creation). Therefore, any positive statement that attributes a quality to God is misleading, because it implies that God has parts (the quality is added to God's essence), belongs to a category (other things share the same quality), or is comparable to creatures (the quality is defined by human experience).

The solution: approach God through negation. "God is wise" is less accurate than "God is not ignorant." "God is powerful" is less accurate than "God is not weak." "God exists" is less accurate than "God's existence is not like the existence of anything else." Each negation removes a false conception and brings the mind closer to the reality that transcends all conceptions.

Maimonides pushes this logic to its conclusion: "The more attributes you deny with respect to God, the more you know of God." True knowledge of God is knowing what God is not. The ultimate knowledge is silence: the recognition that God's nature exceeds the capacity of human language and thought.

This position has parallels in multiple traditions: Pseudo-Dionysius's apophatic theology in Christianity, the neti neti ("not this, not this") of the Upanishads in Hinduism, and the Buddhist concept of sunyata (emptiness) as the nature of ultimate reality. Maimonides arrived at his position through Aristotelian logic, but the convergence with mystical traditions is striking and has been noted by scholars including Seyyed Hossein Nasr and David Burrell.

Reason and Revelation

Maimonides' position on the relationship between reason and revelation is nuanced. He does not simply subordinate one to the other. Instead, he argues that both are modes of access to the same truth, each with its own domain of authority:

Where reason produces certain conclusions: Follow reason. If philosophy demonstrates something with certainty (for example, that God is not a body), then Scripture must be interpreted accordingly, even if the literal meaning suggests otherwise. Reason cannot be overridden by a reading of Scripture when the philosophical proof is sound.

Where reason produces probable but not certain conclusions: Defer to Scripture. On the question of creation vs. eternity, for example, Maimonides argues that Aristotle's philosophical arguments for the eternity of the universe are strong but not conclusive. Since the arguments are not decisive, the Torah's teaching of creation stands as the authoritative position.

Where Scripture addresses matters beyond reason's reach: Accept Scripture on faith. Matters such as the details of the afterlife, the specifics of the messianic age, and the ultimate purpose of creation lie beyond what philosophy can determine, and Scripture's guidance on these matters should be accepted.

This threefold division allows Maimonides to maintain both philosophical integrity and religious commitment. He does not ask the philosopher to abandon reason, nor does he ask the believer to abandon faith. He asks both to recognize the limits of their respective methods and to trust that truth, properly understood, is one.

The Creation Question

The question of whether the universe was created in time (as the Torah teaches) or is eternal (as Aristotle argued) was the central philosophical-theological controversy of the medieval period. Maimonides' treatment of it is a masterpiece of intellectual nuance.

He presents three positions:

1. Aristotle: The universe is eternal and has always existed in its current form. There was no "beginning."
2. Plato: God created the universe from pre-existing matter. There was a beginning, but not creation from nothing.
3. Torah: God created the universe from nothing (yesh me'ayin, creation ex nihilo). Before creation, nothing existed except God.

Maimonides argues that Aristotle's position cannot be proven by philosophical argument. The arguments for eternity are strong but not conclusive. Since they are not conclusive, the philosopher has no grounds for insisting on eternity. And since the Torah teaches creation, the religious philosopher is free to accept creation as the more likely position.

This move, accepting creation not because it can be proven but because the alternative cannot be proven either, is characteristic of Maimonides' philosophical method. He does not claim more than reason can deliver. He does not pretend that creation ex nihilo is philosophically demonstrable. He simply shows that the philosophical case for eternity is not as strong as the Aristotelians claim, leaving room for Scripture's teaching to fill the gap.

The Nature of Prophecy

Maimonides' treatment of prophecy is one of the Guide's most original and influential contributions. He presents three views:

The common view: God simply chooses someone to be a prophet, regardless of their qualifications. Prophecy is entirely a gift of divine grace.

The philosophical view: Prophecy is the natural result of intellectual and moral perfection. When a person's rational faculty reaches its highest development and their moral character is fully refined, the divine emanation (the Active Intellect) flows into them naturally, producing prophetic knowledge.

Maimonides' view: Prophecy requires both human perfection and divine assent. A person must develop their intellect, moral character, and imagination to the highest degree, but God may still withhold prophecy from a qualified individual. This preserves both the naturalistic dimension (prophecy requires preparation) and the supernatural dimension (God retains the freedom to grant or withhold it).

The requirement of imagination is notable. Maimonides argues that the prophetic imagination transforms abstract intellectual truths into concrete images, narratives, and visions that can be communicated to ordinary people. The prophet is not merely a philosopher; they are a philosopher with a powerful imagination that can "translate" philosophical truth into accessible form. This explains why prophecy takes the form of visions, parables, and stories rather than philosophical treatises.

The Purpose of the Commandments

Part III of the Guide provides rational explanations for the Torah's commandments (ta'amei ha-mitzvot), a project that was both intellectually daring and religiously controversial.

Maimonides classifies the commandments into several categories based on their purposes:

Promoting correct beliefs: Commandments that combat idolatry, establish monotheism, and teach the nature of God.

Cultivating moral virtue: Laws governing interpersonal conduct, justice, charity, and social responsibility.

Maintaining social order: Laws governing governance, courts, testimony, and civil procedure.

Preventing ancient idolatrous practices: Many of the Torah's more puzzling laws (such as the prohibition against mixing wool and linen, or the details of the sacrificial system) are explained as measures to distance Israel from the idolatrous practices of the surrounding nations, particularly the Sabians, whom Maimonides identifies as the primary source of ancient idolatry.

This rationalist approach to the commandments was controversial because it implied that the commandments serve human purposes rather than divine whims. Traditional authorities objected that reducing the commandments to rational purposes diminished their divine authority. Maimonides' response was that understanding a commandment's purpose does not diminish its binding force but deepens one's commitment to it.

Divine Providence and Evil

Maimonides addresses the problem of evil with characteristic philosophical precision. He distinguishes between three types of evil:

1. Natural evil: Caused by the inherent limitations of material existence (earthquakes, disease, death). These are necessary consequences of living in a physical world and are not "evil" in themselves but natural processes that occasionally affect individuals.
2. Social evil: Caused by human beings harming each other (war, injustice, oppression). This is the most common form of evil and is entirely within human control to prevent.
3. Self-inflicted evil: Caused by individuals harming themselves through excess, ignorance, or moral failure. Maimonides argues that most of what people call "evil" falls into this category.

Evil, for Maimonides (following Aristotle and the Neoplatonists), is not a positive substance but a privation of good, the absence of a quality rather than the presence of a negative quality. This position, shared with Augustine in the Christian tradition, resolves the logical problem of evil (how can an all-good God create evil?) by denying that evil is a "thing" that needs to be created.

Regarding divine providence, Maimonides argues that individual providence (God's care for specific individuals) is proportional to a person's intellectual development. The more a person develops their intellect and approaches knowledge of God, the more they fall under divine providence. Those who are intellectually undeveloped are governed more by natural law and chance. This position is both intellectually rigorous (it provides a mechanism for providence) and morally challenging (it implies that intellectual development is morally significant).

Influence on Christian Philosophy

The Guide's influence on Christian scholasticism was enormous. Thomas Aquinas cited Maimonides (whom he called "Rabbi Moses") more than any other Jewish philosopher, drawing on his work for:

• The proofs for God's existence (Aquinas's "Five Ways" are influenced by Maimonides' treatment of the same arguments)
• The theory of divine attributes (Aquinas's doctrine of analogy is a response to Maimonides' negative theology)
• The relationship between faith and reason (Aquinas's distinction between truths accessible to reason and truths requiring faith parallels Maimonides' threefold division)
• The nature of prophecy (Aquinas adapted Maimonides' account for his own Christological purposes)

Albertus Magnus, Duns Scotus, and Meister Eckhart also drew on the Guide. Eckhart's negative theology, with its insistence on the "God beyond God" who transcends all concepts and attributes, has been directly connected to Maimonides' influence. The Guide has been described as a "Jewish-scholastic Summa" because of its structural and methodological parallels with the great summae of Christian scholasticism.

The Maimonidean Controversy

The Guide provoked one of the most bitter controversies in Jewish intellectual history. In the 1230s, rabbis in southern France, led by Solomon ben Abraham of Montpellier, condemned the Guide as heretical and appealed to the Dominican inquisition (then active in suppressing heresy among Christians) to have it burned. The Dominicans complied, burning copies of the Guide in Montpellier in 1232.

The controversy centred on several issues:

• Maimonides' allegorization of biblical narratives (reading the account of Abraham's visitors as a prophetic vision rather than a historical event)
• His apparent subordination of Torah to philosophy (seeming to imply that philosophical truth is the criterion by which Scripture must be judged)
• His negative theology (which some critics saw as emptying God of all content)
• His rationalization of the commandments (which some saw as undermining their divine authority)

The controversy eventually subsided, and Maimonides' position as the greatest medieval Jewish philosopher became universally accepted. But the tension between rationalist and mystical approaches to Judaism that the Guide represents continues to this day. The Kabbalistic tradition, which emerged partly in reaction to Maimonides' rationalism, offered a different approach to the same questions: accessing God through mystical experience rather than philosophical reasoning.

Modern Relevance

The Guide's central question, how to maintain intellectual integrity while remaining committed to a religious tradition, is as urgent today as it was in the 12th century. Modern religious thinkers face the same challenge Maimonides addressed: reconciling scientific knowledge (evolution, cosmology, neuroscience) with religious commitment (creation, providence, the soul).

Maimonides' approach, neither abandoning reason for faith nor abandoning faith for reason, but seeking the integration of both within a single coherent worldview, remains one of the most sophisticated models available for this project. His willingness to reinterpret Scripture when science demands it, combined with his insistence that science does not have all the answers, provides a template for religious engagement with modernity that avoids both fundamentalism and capitulation.

The negative theology of the Guide also has contemporary resonance. In an age when many people reject the anthropomorphic God of popular religion (the "old man in the sky") but remain open to some form of transcendence, Maimonides' insistence that God is "not a body, not a force in a body, not limited, not comparable to anything in creation" offers a sophisticated philosophical alternative to both naive theism and militant atheism.

Translations

• Shlomo Pines (University of Chicago Press, 1963): The standard English translation, based on the Judeo-Arabic original. Includes a famous introductory essay by Leo Strauss on the Guide's esoteric dimension.
• M. Friedlander (1881): An older translation that is less accurate but freely available online (gutenberg.org). Useful for casual reading but not for serious study.
• Lenn Goodman (Stanford University Press, 2024): A recent translation with extensive commentary that makes the Guide accessible to modern readers.
• Josef Stern (University of Chicago Press, 2013): The Matter and Form of Maimonides' Guide: not a translation but the most important recent study of the Guide's philosophical method.

Get the Guide

Get The Guide for the Perplexed on Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, Thalira earns from qualifying purchases.