Steiner's name for the soul's eternity reaching back before birth, the missing counterpart to immortality that the West lost and the ancient East kept.
Unbornness in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's term, rendered from the German Ungeburtlichkeit (also Ungeborensein), for the soul's existence before birth or conception, the precise counterpart to immortality. In Spiritual Science as a Foundation for Social Forms (GA 199, 1920) Steiner observes that Western languages possess a word for life continuing after death, immortality, but no equivalent word pointing back to a life that preceded the body. That missing concept names a real lacuna: the West retained eternity looking forward and forgot eternity looking backward. The ancient Orient still held this prenatal view, regarding earthly life as a task received in spiritual worlds before descent. For Steiner, only a soul-science that speaks of unbornness alongside immortality grasps the human being's full eternity and, with it, repeated earthly lives.
Unbornness is the spiritual fact that the human soul existed before birth, mirroring the more familiar idea of immortality after death. Rudolf Steiner coined the word, after the German Ungeborenheit, to name a concept Western thought had lost: while we readily say a soul is immortal, we have no everyday word asserting it is unborn, eternal looking backward as well as forward toward the prenatal worlds from which each person descends.
In Steiner's Own Words
People today indulge only the egotism of the soul that wishes to cling to a postexistence; they do not want to press onward to a real comprehension of the human soul which had experiences before birth, just as it will have experiences after death. The whole, complete eternity of the human soul is only grasped by one who can not only speak of immortality but, based an insight, of “unbornness,” too. We can believe, because belief always comes from a desire for life after death. We can know of the life before birth and the life after death as two things that are inseparable. Knowledge takes in the total being of the human soul; belief is concerned only with the postmortem existence.
What it Means Today
The gap Steiner pointed to in 1920 was reopened, from an entirely secular direction, by modern philosophy of death. In his 1970 essay "Death", first published in the journal Nous and reprinted in his 1979 collection Mortal Questions, Thomas Nagel revived an old puzzle from the Roman poet Lucretius: why do we dread the nonexistence that follows death, yet feel nothing about the equally vast nonexistence that preceded our birth? Lucretius treated this prenatal void as a mirror image of the posthumous one and used the symmetry to argue that death is no evil. Later analytic philosophers, including Anthony Brueckner and John Martin Fischer in their 1986 paper "Why Is Death Bad?" in Philosophical Studies, pressed exactly the asymmetry Steiner had named: our language and feeling are loaded toward the future and blank toward the past.
Steiner reaches the same fault line and turns it the other way. Where the analytic tradition argues from the prenatal blank to console us about death, he argues that the blank is itself the symptom of a forgotten truth, that the soul was genuinely present before conception, not merely absent. Thalira synthesis: the philosophy-of-death symmetry debate and Steiner's unbornness are two readings of one missing word, one concluding that we came from nothing and so lose nothing, the other that we came from spirit and have simply mislaid the language for it. To work with unbornness practically is to look at a developing child, or at one's own biography, as the continuation of a life that had a direction before the body began.
Where to Read More