The eternal I that passes between incarnations first appears to spirit-cognition as a remote stranger, and only love strong enough to surrender the earthly I recognises it.
The True I as a Strange Being in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's description of the first encounter with the eternal individuality that carries over from one earthly life to the next: it appears to spirit-cognition not as a familiar self but as a far remote, entirely alien being. Steiner set this out in the lecture of 22 April 1923 at Dornach, in the cycle The Spiritual Development of Man (GA 84), where the seeker looks back past the etheric life-tableau and the astral world between death and rebirth to behold a being representing the essence of the previous incarnation. Two conditions govern the meeting. The true I withdraws whenever it is sought for its own sake, since egoism is the opposite of love; and it is found only when love has been intensified into a force of knowledge, so that the earthly I is surrendered. Recognising the stranger as oneself is the act that completes the encounter.
The True I as a Strange Being names the moment in Steiner's path of knowledge when the eternal individuality shows itself before it is recognised. What appears is not a warm inner core but a distant figure carrying the essence of the previous incarnation. Steiner insists the recognition arrives second, after the strangeness, and that love rather than introspection is what closes the gap.
In Steiner's Own Words
One has to lose one's earthly ‘I’ to behold one's true ‘I.’ And he who fails to accomplish this act of surrender has simply no means of finding the true ‘I.’ One could say that the true ‘I’ does not want to be sought whenever revelation of its presence is desired. If sought for, it hides. For only in love will it be found, and love is a surrender of self to the other being. For that reason the true Self must be found as if it were another being. At the moment of coming face to face with one's true ‘I,’ one also becomes aware of what lives in a wider world, in the spiritual world itself. One meets the beings of the first Hierarchy: Seraphim, Cherubim, Thrones.
What it Means Today
Paul Ricoeur reached a structurally similar conclusion from an entirely different direction. In his Gifford Lectures at Edinburgh in 1986, published in French as Soi-même comme un autre (Éditions du Seuil, 1990) and in Kathleen Blamey's English translation as Oneself as Another (University of Chicago Press, 1992), Ricoeur separated two senses of identity that ordinary speech runs together. Idem-identity is sameness, the set of traits that persist and can be catalogued. Ipse-identity is selfhood, the one who answers when called and keeps a promise across time. Ricoeur's argument is that ipse cannot be reached by looking inward at idem. It is constituted through a detour: through narrative, through the claim of the other person, through being addressed. The title is the thesis. You arrive at yourself as at another.
Steiner is describing the same reversal at the threshold of spirit-cognition rather than in hermeneutic philosophy, and he is more literal about it: the other one meets really is the previous incarnation, not a figure of speech. Thalira synthesis: introspection never yields the true I because introspection is idem-shaped and inventories traits, while the true I is ipse-shaped and answers only to address, which is why Steiner makes love, the turning of the whole soul toward another, the organ of this knowledge rather than concentration. That distinction changes how the evening retrospect is practised. Reviewing the day as though it belonged to someone else keeps the review perceptual instead of self-justifying, the small daily form of the surrender Steiner names.
Where to Read More