Steiner reads the three women of John 19:25 as the sentient, intellectual, and consciousness souls, while insisting they also stood bodily at the foot of the cross.
The Three Women at the Cross in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's reading of John 19:25, the verse naming the mother of Jesus, her sister Mary the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene at Golgotha, as a picture of the threefold human soul. In the Basle lectures on the Gospel of St. John (GA 100, November 1907), Steiner assigns Mary Magdalene to the sentient soul, Mary the wife of Cleophas to the intellectual soul, and the unnamed mother of Jesus, the Virgin Sophia, to the consciousness soul (Bewusstseinsseele). He insists on both readings at once: three historical persons stood bodily at the foot of the cross, and the wise powers guiding humanity arranged the fact so that it would also picture the soul's three members. The double reading trains the same both-and discipline that Henri de Lubac later recovered for biblical interpretation in Medieval Exegesis.
The Three Women at the Cross form one of the quietest riddles in the Gospel of St. John: two sisters seemingly share the name Mary, and the mother of Jesus is never named at all. Steiner treats the oddity as deliberate. For him the scene at Golgotha is a soul-diagram drawn in living persons, each woman bearing one member of the threefold soul his anthroposophy describes.
In Steiner's Own Words
The explanations here given must not give rise to the idea that the descriptions in St. John's Gospel are to be looked upon as symbols only. In ancient times names were not given arbitrarily, they were strictly adapted to the person's character. It is true that the three women who stood by the cross of Jesus represented the three souls, the sentient soul the intellectual soul and the spiritual soul; but it is also true that these three persons stood there in the body at the foot of the cross.
What it Means Today
Steiner's refusal to choose between history and symbol has a striking counterpart in twentieth-century Catholic scholarship. The French Jesuit Henri de Lubac spent the years 1959 to 1964 publishing Exégèse médiévale, translated as Medieval Exegesis, a four-part study that recovered the old fourfold sense of Scripture: the literal event, the allegorical meaning, the moral application, and the anagogical promise. De Lubac's central argument is the same both-and Steiner voiced in Basle half a century earlier: the spiritual senses do not replace the literal event, they stand on it, and a reader who dissolves the history into pure symbol loses both. Where de Lubac traced this discipline through Origen, Cassian, and the medieval cloister schools, Steiner traced it through the school of Dionysius, in which the sentient soul was called Mary Magdalene and the intellectual soul Mary. Both men were pushing against the habit, dominant since David Friedrich Strauss and the nineteenth-century critical school, of treating the Gospels as either court records or invented myth.
Thalira synthesis: the Three Women at the Cross work as a Gospel-reading exercise for the soul itself, since the reader who holds fact and picture together at Golgotha is practising, in miniature, the cooperation of sentient, intellectual, and consciousness soul that the three women portray. For practice, read John 19:25 slowly twice, once as reportage and once as a portrait of the inner household, and notice which of the two readings your habits resist.
Where to Read More