Steiner's paired image for the arterial and venous systems: the red tree that made us knowing beings, the blue tree he called the Tree of Death.
The Red and Blue Blood Trees in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's image for the two branching vessel systems the human body carries: the red arterial tree, kindled by in-breathed oxygen, and the blue venous tree, loaded with carbonic acid, running back toward the heart. Steiner gave the picture at Kassel on 29 June 1907, in the cycle published in English as Theosophy and Rosicrucianism (GA 100). Warm red blood, he taught, let the I take hold of the body and made the human being a knowing, ego-bearing creature. The same exchange binds knowledge to dying, so the blue tree carries the name Tree of Death (Baum des Todes). The Golden Legend of Seth, in which the Trees of Knowledge and of Life grow intertwined, hides the same secret. The Rosicrucian goal Steiner names is that the heart-organ will one day turn blue blood back to red inside the body.
The red and blue blood trees are Rudolf Steiner's name for the arterial and venous systems seen as two living plants growing through the body. One tree carries oxygen and carries thought. The other carries carbonic acid and carries death. Steiner read the pair as the physical signature of the human I, bought at the price of mortality, and as a task later set for the heart.
In Steiner's Own Words
You have two trees within you: the tree of the red blood, and the tree of the blue blood. Man, as the bearer of an Ego, could not exist without these two trees. He had to take in the blood in order to have an Ego, and that is how our modern knowledge arises; this forms its foundation. But death was connected with this development, for you constantly transform the red blood into blue blood filled with carbonic acid! The occult teacher of the Old Testament therefore said: “Look upon your own being: you have within you the red tree of blood; without this tree you would never have become a cognitive human being.”
What it Means Today
Steiner's picture asks something of the heart that standard physiology does not, not to push the blood but to work upon it. The prior question, what the heart actually does, has a live modern literature. Branko Furst, an anesthesiologist and professor of anesthesiology at Albany Medical College, published The Heart and Circulation: An Integrative Model with Springer in 2013, with a second edition in 2020. Furst gathers embryological and clinical observations that sit badly with the pressure-pump account, among them the movement of blood in the early embryo before the heart begins to contract. His proposal is that the blood behaves as an autonomously moving organ and that the heart works as a regulator within that stream, ordering flow rather than generating all of it. Furst writes as a clinician rather than as an anthroposophist, and he makes no argument for a future organ of carbon transformation.
Thalira synthesis: set side by side, Furst supplies an anatomical grammar for what Steiner offered as a moral picture, that the heart stands between two opposed streams as a witness rather than a motor, which is the exact position from which Steiner says a conscious transformation of the blue tree could begin. For the reader the practice is small. Follow the breath as the place where the two trees meet, each inhalation feeding the red tree, each exhalation handing the blue tree's burden to the plant world.
Where to Read More