Width, depth, and height as Steiner read them: not given forms of the mind, but realities the threefold body constitutes in seeing, gesturing, and walking.
The Three Dimensions of Space in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's account, given in the Stuttgart lectures of 1921 (GA 324), of how width, depth, and height are not Kantian a priori forms of the mind but realities constituted by the threefold human body. In Steiner's reading the two surface dimensions arrive ready-made in binocular seeing through the nerve-sense organism. The width dimension is felt inwardly as symmetry through free arm movement in the rhythmic organism. The vertical or height dimension is constituted only in walking, through the metabolic-limb organism. Each spatial direction therefore corresponds to one member of the threefold human being. Only the act of walking, an act of will, opens all three dimensions to experience at once. Against Kant, Steiner holds that space is lived in the subconscious will before it is abstracted into mathematical-geometrical space by the head.
In Steiner's Own Words
In this way I have pointed you toward reality. In Kantianism this reality appears in an unreal form. Kantianism speaks of the three dimensions being contained a priori in the human organization, and of the human organization transposing its subjective experience out into space. How is it that Kant came to this one-sided view? He arrived at this because he did not know that what is brought into consciousness in the delicate experience of the depth dimension, and otherwise abstractly, is experienced in its reality in our subconscious. We experience the reality of the three dimensions through our individual human organization.
What it Means Today
Steiner's claim, that space is not a frame we impose but a reality our moving body builds, anticipates a turn in cognitive science by some seventy years. In The Embodied Mind (MIT Press, 1991), Francisco Varela, Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch argued that perception is not the passive reception of a ready-made world but an enaction, a structure brought forth through bodily activity. Their phrase was "laying down a path in walking," and the example was not chosen at random: Varela, a biologist trained at Harvard, kept returning to locomotion as the model case of cognition that cannot be separated from the moving organism. Where Steiner in 1921 located the third dimension in the metabolic-limb activity of walking, the enactive program located spatial structure itself in sensorimotor contingency, the lawful way appearances shift as the body moves.
The lineage runs through Maurice Merleau-Ponty, whose Phenomenology of Perception (1945) Thompson cites directly, and whose "lived body" is the felt, gesturing body Steiner describes feeling its own symmetry through the left and right arm. Thalira synthesis: read this way, Steiner's three modes of activity are an early field map of what phenomenologists now call the motor intentionality of space, with one addition the academy still resists, that the will lives the vertical before the head ever abstracts it into a line.
Where to Read More