Steiner's polarity between the old wisdom bound to blood and race, and the freely chosen Christ-community of spirit and soul.
The Blood-Relationship and the Christ-Relationship name the two ways a person can belong to spiritual knowledge, as Rudolf Steiner set them out through St. Paul. The first binds wisdom to blood, descent, and race, received at birth. The second is a community of spirit and soul that each person freely elects to join, after the Mystery of Golgotha released the spirit from the blood.
In Steiner's Own Words
For Paul was the first to declare that neither blood nor identity of race, nor any factor by which human knowledge had been determined in pre-Christian times, could remain, but that man himself must establish his relation to knowledge through inner initiative: that there must be a community of those whom he designated as Christians, a community to which man allies himself in spirit and soul, into which he is not placed by his blood, but of which he himself elects to be a member.
What it Means Today
The political theorist Benedict Anderson gave this distinction its sharpest modern echo in Imagined Communities (1983, Verso). Anderson argued that the nation is not an ancient blood-fact but a cultural artifact, an "imagined community" whose members will never meet yet picture themselves as kin, bound by a fraternity worth dying for. Steiner had said much the same in 1920 from the carpenter's hut at Dornach: by the modern age, he held, blood-relationship "is no longer a factor of any real significance," and the nationalism that invokes it is "a pure fiction, an illusion." Where Anderson traced the fiction to print-capitalism and the vernacular newspaper, Steiner traced it to a spiritual lateness, the old blood-wisdom persisting as a shadow after its hour had passed at the Mystery of Golgotha. Both men, a Marxist historian and an Anthroposophist, arrive at the same diagnosis from opposite ground: belonging by descent has become a story we tell, not a reality we inherit. Thalira synthesis: read together, Anderson supplies the sociology of the fiction and Steiner supplies its spiritual physiology, the claim that the blood once genuinely carried the spirit and now only counterfeits it, so that what feels like ancestral loyalty is in fact a luciferic afterglow the Christ-relationship was meant to replace with freely chosen kinship of soul.
Where to Read More