A polarity in which Sun forces shape the human form and make a person an individual, while Moon forces drive heredity and the propagation of the race.
Sun and Moon Forces in Anthroposophy is the polarity Rudolf Steiner described whereby the Sun forces shape the human form from outside and make a person an individual Ego-bearer, while the Moon forces work from within the metabolism to drive heredity and propagate the human race. Set out in Man, Offspring of the World of Stars (GA 204, 1921), the polarity belongs to Steiner's spiritual embryology. The Sun forces mould the human shape during embryonic life and place man on Earth as a single individuality. The Moon forces stream outward from the metabolic centre, govern reproduction, and produce the human race as a succession of generations. Earth supplies only substance through food, while Sun and Moon supply the formative direction. Read today, the polarity speaks to phenomenological embryology, where form is treated as a gesture of the whole organism rather than a readout of inherited genes.
Sun and Moon forces are the two cosmic streams Steiner set in polar antithesis to explain the human being. The Sun forces work from outside, sculpting the bodily form and rooting each person on Earth as a distinct Ego. The Moon forces work from inside the metabolism, carrying substance into living tissue and driving reproduction, so that the race continues through the generations.
In Steiner's Own Words
And so on the one hand the development and evolution of the Ego of man is dependent upon the forces of the Sun. Without the Sun, man could not be an Ego being living on the Earth; on the other hand there could be no such thing as propagation, there could be no human race without the Moon. The human race as the physical product of the generations is a product of the Moon forces which have worked in the generative process. As an individuality, however, man is the product of the Sun forces.
What it Means Today
Steiner's claim that the embryo is given its form from outside, rather than read off from the fertilised germ, finds a careful modern counterpart in the work of Jaap van der Wal, who taught anatomy and embryology at the University of Maastricht until 2012 and now runs the seminar series Embryo in Motion. Van der Wal builds on Erich Blechschmidt, the Göttingen anatomist whose collection of nearly two hundred thousand serial sections of human embryos let him describe development as a sequence of growth gestures rather than a mechanical assembly of inherited parts. In this phenomenological embryology, motion comes first and visible form second, and the organism shapes itself in living relation to its whole surrounding field. Neither van der Wal nor Blechschmidt invokes Sun and Moon, and neither should be read as endorsing Steiner. What they share with him is a refusal to treat the genome as the sole author of the body. Thalira synthesis: where Blechschmidt locates the formative gesture in the embryo's own movement and Steiner locates it in the Sun working upon the form from without, both stand against the modern assumption that heredity alone, the Moon pole in Steiner's language, accounts for the whole human being.
Where to Read More