Steiner's contrast between inhabiting the bare sound-element of speech and grasping a word's abstract meaning, which he treated as a later, secondary intrusion.
Sound-Formation Versus Sound-Meaning in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's distinction between living inside the bare sound-element of speech and grasping the abstract meaning that words carry. In Methodology and Nature of Speech Formation (GA 280, lectures of 1922 to 1924), Steiner set reciters to practise tongue-twisters and words spoken backward, exercises whose sense does not matter, so that, by disregarding meaning, the speaker reaches more quickly what he called the spirit of the speech-sounds. Meaning, for Steiner, is a secondary intrusion that enters only when one departs from the pure formative gesture of the sound itself. He grounded this in his art of speech formation (Sprachgestaltung), developed with Marie Steiner and taught at the Goetheanum in Dornach. The same intuition, that sound carries content before sense, surfaces in modern sound-symbolism research.
In Steiner's Own Words
So it is a matter of one having to learn to feel the sound-images, if one wishes to learn to recite. Now imagine: one wants to bring someone to pass over from rest into activity. Take the following sound-image: Whistle whimsical whistler's whistles (Pfeife pfiffige Pfeiferpfiffe). There is something in it of pushing the other onward. Feel fully that force of pushing onward, as it expresses itself in the little word: Pfui (Fie). Then try to practise something of the kind in a softened form: Receive, feeling, pounds of pepper (Empfange empfindend Pfunde Pfeffer). In such exercises the meaning does not matter. When one disregards the meaning, one discovers more quickly the spirit of the speech-sounds. Whoever learns to live in the speech-sound receives revelations of worlds.
What it Means Today
Steiner's claim that the bare sound carries content before any meaning attaches finds a precise modern test in sound-symbolism research. In 1929 the Gestalt psychologist Wolfgang Kohler, in his book Gestalt Psychology, showed observers two drawings, one jagged and one rounded, and asked which was named "takete" and which "maluma." Almost everyone paired the spiky figure with the sharp-edged word and the curved figure with the soft one. In 2001 the neuroscientists Vilayanur Ramachandran and Edward Hubbard renamed the demonstration the bouba and kiki effect and reported the same match in roughly 95 percent of people. A 2022 study in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B confirmed it across many cultures and writing systems. The finding states, in laboratory terms, what Steiner had reciters discover by disregarding sense in tongue-twisters: a speech-sound shapes an experience on its own, before the dictionary is consulted.
Thalira synthesis: where the laboratory reads the takete and maluma match as a fixed sensory cross-wiring, Steiner read it as a faculty to be trained, holding that the reciter who learns to disregard meaning recovers an older, formative listening in which the sound itself, not its label, is the bearer of the world. Speech formation continues at the Goetheanum's Section for the Performing Arts in Dornach, where students still practise reversed words and consonant clusters to school exactly this perception.
Where to Read More