Steiner's building style in which a structure is shaped like a living organism, every form following inner necessity instead of the repeated right angle.
Organic Architecture is Rudolf Steiner's approach to building in which the whole structure is conceived as a single living organism. Walls, columns and domes are not assembled from interchangeable right-angled units but grow one from another, each form held in place by an inner necessity. Steiner developed it in the first Goetheanum at Dornach, where no detail could be moved without recomposing the entire building.
In Steiner's Own Words
Each single part of a living organism has to exist within and in accordance with the whole living organism. It would be nonsense to say: I want to change the nose and put a different organ in the place where the nose now is.' It is a matter of actual fact that the big toe, and the small toe as well, would have to be different if the nose were different. Just as nobody in his senses would wish to re-model the nose, so it is impossible that the form here should be other than it is. If this form were different, the whole building would have to be different, for the whole is conceived in living, organic form.
What it Means Today
The clearest modern carrier of Steiner's impulse is the practice of living architecture, the design lineage that treats a building as something that grows, breathes and meets the body as gesture rather than as a serviceable box. Its founding monument is the second Goetheanum at Dornach, the sculpted concrete building Steiner modelled before his death in 1925 and Edith Maryon helped realise, completed in 1928. There the right angle is dissolved into flowing wall and cantilevered mass, exactly the move described in GA 286: the form is read from an inner law of the whole, not from structural convenience. The Stuttgart firm Behnisch and the Hamburg architect Joachim Eble carried the same reading into late-twentieth-century ecological building, and the worldwide network of Waldorf schools and the Vidarkliniken at Järna in Sweden, designed by Erik Asmussen between 1985 and 1992, gave it a living institutional home. What unites these works is the refusal Steiner named at the column: a member cannot be standardised and repeated, because in an organism the part is answerable to the whole. This is the point at which organic architecture stands closest to its sister-art, sculpture. Both ask the builder to model from inner feeling, to caress the surface coming into being under the hand, so that wall and capital arrive as living plastic form rather than as drafted geometry. The contemporary value is concrete: a school or clinic shaped this way is experienced less as a container and more as a body the human being can inhabit.
Where to Read More