Steiner's warning that unpurified sexual force can secretly fuel mystical vision, producing a false clairvoyance that the schooling path must recognize and exclude.
Mysticism and Sexuality in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's teaching that unpurified sexual force can secretly infiltrate mystical and visionary experience, producing a false, Maya-veiled clairvoyance. In the GA 253 lectures of September 1915 at Dornach, Steiner showed through the seer Emanuel Swedenborg how the power that works on the physical plane as sexuality can be carried upward into spiritual perception, where it builds a hidden bridge between clairvoyance and the lowest instincts. Because sexuality is the descent of higher human activity into its lowest earthly form, the schooling path requires that this force be recognized, kept separate, and excluded through self-discipline, so that a genuinely new spiritual organ of perception forms in its place rather than the mystical merely masking the erotic.
In Steiner's Own Words
What is this power? On earth, on the physical plane, it is the power that manifests itself in sexual life, in proper sexual life; that mysterious power that brings people together in earthly love, which is different from all other powers of cognition. Swedenborg had preserved and stored this power, and at a certain age it was transformed in him, but remained, in a sense, sexual power. He saw the spiritual world through sexual power. That is to say, Swedenborg's clairvoyance is truly based on transformed sexual power.
What it Means Today
The intuition that mystical rapture and erotic desire share an underground channel did not stay locked inside Steiner's 1915 Dornach lectures. It became a central problem in academic religious studies. Jeffrey J. Kripal, the J. Newton Rayzor Professor of Religion at Rice University, built much of his early work on exactly this question. In Kali's Child (University of Chicago Press, 1995) he read the visions of the Bengali saint Ramakrishna as shot through with unresolved erotic energy, and in Roads of Excess, Palaces of Wisdom: Eroticism and Reflexivity in the Study of Mysticism (University of Chicago Press, 2001) he traced how scholars from Evelyn Underhill onward kept circling the same entanglement of sexuality and the sacred. Kripal does not aim to debunk the vision by naming its erotic root, and neither did Steiner. Steiner's distinctive move was diagnostic rather than reductive: where Sigmund Freud, whose psychoanalysis Steiner attacked in these very lectures, dissolved the mystical into the sexual, Steiner reversed the direction, calling sexuality the lowest earthly form of a higher activity. The Thalira synthesis: Steiner anticipated by eighty years the scholarly recognition that the erotic can wear the mask of the mystical, but he answered it with a schooling discipline rather than a hermeneutic of suspicion, asking the seeker to build a new organ of perception instead of explaining the old one away.
Where to Read More