Steiner's claim that no motor nerves exist: all nerves are sensory, and the will works directly in metabolism, not through a nerve that commands movement.
Motor Nerves and the Will in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's heretical physiological doctrine, set out in the 1916 Berlin lectures collected as GA 066, that no motor nerves exist. For Steiner every nerve is sensory. The so-called motor nerves do not command movement, they perceive movement the will has already produced. The will itself works directly in the metabolic and limb organism, in the digestive and nutritive processes, never through a nerve. Steiner re-read locomotor ataxia and a crushed spinal cord not as a broken command line but as failed perception: the foot cannot be moved because the severed sensory nerve can no longer feel what happens in the leg. The doctrine belongs to Steiner's threefold physiology, where nerve serves thinking, breath serves feeling, and metabolism serves willing. It now sits beside the reafference principle of von Holst and Mittelstaedt.
Motor nerves and the will in Steiner's account reverse the standard physiological picture. Mainstream science divides the nerves into sensory nerves, which carry perception inward, and motor nerves, which carry the will's command outward to the muscles. Steiner denied the second class entirely. The will acts on metabolism in the limbs, and the nerve only registers, dimly, the movement that results.
In Steiner's Own Words
There are no motor nerves. What contemporary physiology sees as motor nerves, as nerves causing motion, as will impulse nerves, are actually sensory nerves. If the spinal column has been damaged in a certain section, then what goes on in the leg, in the foot, is simply not perceived, and the foot, therefore, because it is not perceived, cannot be moved; not because a motor nerve has been severed, but because a sensory nerve has been severed which cannot perceive what happens in the leg.
What it Means Today
Steiner knew this claim sounded heretical, and he said so in the lecture hall. A century later one strand of physiology has moved partway toward him. In 1950 Erich von Holst and Horst Mittelstaedt published the reafference principle in the journal Naturwissenschaften, showing that when an organism moves itself, the nervous system sends an internal copy of the outgoing command, an efference copy, and uses it to predict the sensory consequences of the movement. The system then compares prediction with what the senses actually report. This is why you cannot tickle yourself, and why a pushed eyeball makes the room seem to jump while a willed glance does not. The reafference work does not abolish the motor neuron, so it is not Steiner's doctrine. What it shares with him is the deeper insight that self-generated movement is something the nervous system perceives and monitors, not simply something it dictates. Both pictures place perception of one's own motion at the centre of willed action. Thalira synthesis: Steiner pushed the same intuition to its limit, locating the will not in any nerve at all but in the metabolic stirring of the limbs, with the nerve left to read that stirring the way the eye reads light. Anthroposophic medicine, from Ita Wegman onward, has worked with this threefold reading of nerve, rhythm, and metabolism as a map of where illness settles in the body.
Where to Read More