In Steiner's reading of art history, the Renaissance master in whom the human will presses directly into stone and fresco, carrying the soul of Florence into Rome.
Michelangelo (1475 to 1564) is the master Rudolf Steiner reads as will made form. In his 1 November 1916 Dornach lecture, printed in The History of Art (GA 292), Steiner sets the Florentine sculptor of the colossal David apart from Leonardo and Raphael: not the seeker, not the painter of grace, but the will that compels marble and ceiling to obey one inward purpose.
Michelangelo in Anthroposophy is the Renaissance master through whom, as Rudolf Steiner reads him, the human will becomes form. Steiner devoted his Dornach lecture of 1 November 1916, later printed in The History of Art (GA 292), to setting Michelangelo beside Leonardo and Raphael as the three who stand at the dawn of the fifth post-Atlantean age. Born in Florence in 1475 and dying in Rome in 1564, Michelangelo did not, like Leonardo, hold his epoch at a thinker's distance. He bore the very soul of Florence within him and pressed it into marble and fresco, conquering Rome as an artist by making Florence rise again there. Steiner reads the colossal David as free Florence resisting the encroaching great powers, and the Sistine ceiling as one mighty cosmic process held by a single will.
In Steiner's Own Words
Thus Michelangelo entered intensely into all that was taking place through the political conditions in Florence during his long life. We see this in the succession of his life-periods. As a young man, when his career was only just beginning, he witnessed the reign of the great Medici, whose favourite he was, and by whose favour he was enabled to partake in all that the Florence of that time could offer to a man's spiritual life. Whatever of ancient Art and artistry was then available, Michelangelo studied it under the protectorate of the Medici; and it was here that he produced his earliest work.
What it Means Today
Steiner's claim is testable against the work itself, and this is where his reading parts from ordinary art history. He does not treat the David or the Sistine ceiling as a style to be catalogued. He asks what soul-force produced that particular tension in the marble, and answers: a will that had grown up inside the political life of Florence and could not rest until it had pressed that life into form. To read Michelangelo this way you have to look the way Goethe taught, holding the phenomenon steadily until it tells you its own law rather than measuring it against a borrowed aesthetic.
That discipline of seeing is still taught. At the Goetheanum in Dornach, the building Steiner designed and where he gave the 1916 art lectures, the School of Spiritual Science continues the Goethean method of patient observation that lets a work disclose its inner gesture. A visitor standing before a cast of the David is invited to feel the colossal quality Steiner named, the power held in restraint, before reaching for a single word about it. Approached so, Michelangelo stops being a date in a survey and becomes what Steiner saw: the moment Western art learned to carry the whole weight of a human will in a single resisting form, free Florence standing in stone against the great powers of its age.
Where to Read More