The individualized inner images the soul forms when concept meets percept, the representations it retains and can later remember.
A mental picture is the soul's own image of an experience, the representation (Vorstellung) that stays behind once a concept has been joined to a percept. Steiner places it between the pure concept and the bare percept: not the universal idea, not the raw sense-datum, but the memorable, personal copy each soul keeps and can call up again. It is the working substance of ordinary thinking and remembering.
Mental Pictures in Anthroposophy are the individualized images the soul forms when a concept is joined to a percept, the inner representations (Vorstellungen) it retains and can later remember. In Rudolf Steiner's Riddles of the Soul (GA 21, 1917), a mental picture is not the pure concept and not the raw percept, but the soul's own memorable copy of an experience, stored below waking awareness and brought up again through the forces of the body. Steiner shows that a representation is first a purely psychic reality whose living activity is benumbed by sense-perception, so that what reaches normal consciousness is a deadened image of outer reality. The mental picture therefore sits at the threshold between thinking and willing, where the soul lays hold of its own existence. Today the same structure is studied as mental representation in epistemology and cognitive science.
In Steiner's Own Words
To the end of normal memory the body has to function, just as the body has to function in the processes of its sense-organs, in order to bring about representations through the senses. If I am to represent a sensory event, a somatic activity must first come about within the sense organs; and, within the psyche, the representation appears as its result. In the same way, if I am to remember a representation or idea, an inner somatic activity (in refined organs), an activity polarically counter to the activity of the senses, must occur; and, as a result, the remembered representation comes forth. This representation is related to a sensory event which was presented to my soul at some time in the past. I represent that event to myself through an inner experience, to which my somatic organisation enables me.
What it Means Today
Steiner's mental picture is what epistemology now calls a mental representation, and the questions he pressed in 1917 are still the live ones. A percept gives the senses their content; a concept gives thinking its universality; the Vorstellung is the singular thing in between, the image this soul forms of this oak on this afternoon and keeps as its own. In The Philosophy of Freedom (GA 4, 1894) he had already drawn the line sharply: the concept "triangle" holds for every mind, but my mental picture of a triangle is mine alone, coloured by everything I have lived. That distinction, between a shared concept and an individualized representation, is exactly the fault line that analytic philosophy of mind has argued over since, from Brentano's intentionality (whom Steiner cites directly in GA 21) through the debates on mental imagery that Zenon Pylyshyn and Stephen Kosslyn ran at MIT in the 1970s and 1980s.
What anthroposophy adds is a claim cognitive science rarely makes: that the mental picture is a faint, benumbed remainder of a far more living activity. For Steiner the representation does not start as a pale copy; it starts as a vivid spiritual process that sense-perception must dampen before it can be held still and examined. To work with mental pictures deliberately, then, is to notice this dimming and, in meditative practice, to let a representation regain some of its lost vitality rather than treating it as a finished snapshot. The practical upshot is plain enough: attention to how an image forms, and not only to what it depicts, is where the soul finds its own activity at work.
Where to Read More