Steiner's reading of the 1789 slogan: liberty belongs to cultural life, equality to the rights-state, fraternity to the economy, one ideal per sphere.
Liberty, Equality, Fraternity names the rallying cry of the French Revolution, which Rudolf Steiner took up in 1919 and read in a new way. The three ideals seem to clash when a single government tries to honour all three at once. Steiner held that they do not clash. Each is the rightful law of a different region of social life, and the slogan only comes true when each ideal is allowed to govern its own sphere.
A Self-Contained Definition
Liberty, Equality, Fraternity in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's reading of the French Revolution's 1789 slogan, in which the three ideals are not contradictory and not all served by a single state, but each belongs to one member of a healthy threefold social order. Liberty is the law of spiritual-cultural life, where schooling, art, science and religion must be free. Equality is the law of the rights-state, where each adult stands equal before the law. Fraternity is the law of economic life, where people produce and circulate goods for one another's needs. Steiner set this out in his 1919 movement for the threefold commonwealth, arguing that the slogan failed in 1789 because revolutionaries demanded all three from one unitary government. Sorting each ideal into its own sphere is, for Anthroposophy, the social application of spiritual science to the modern question of freedom.
In Steiner's Own Words
The second is the political association of men and is concerned with man's relation to his fellows. And the third is the economic life, concerned with man's relation to the lower man, what man needs in order to raise himself to his true manhood. The Threefold Order has to do with these three spheres. Man should be established in the social organism in accordance with these three members; he must be so established. For the three members have each a quite distinct origin in regard to the human being as such.
What it Means Today
The slogan Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité was painted on town halls across France after 1789 and still heads the constitution of the Fifth Republic. Most readers meet it as a single banner promising three good things from one government. Steiner's 1919 contribution was to ask why, in practice, the three so often work against each other: push equality through the state and you curtail the free play of ideas; protect liberty without limit and fraternal sharing collapses into competition. His answer, given in the lectures that became the threefold-commonwealth campaign, was that the revolutionaries had been right about the ideals and wrong about the address. No unitary state can be the bearer of all three. Liberty wants to live where culture lives, in self-governed schools and an unlicensed life of thought. Equality wants the rights-state, the chamber where every adult casts one vote and stands the same before the law. Fraternity wants the workshop and the market, where I make what you need and you make what I need.
This is where the heart enters the social picture. Fraternity, the ideal Steiner pressed hardest in 1919, is not sentiment but a working arrangement: producers, traders and consumers reading one another's needs closely enough to set a fair price. Where modern politics still tries to legislate brotherhood or to privatise it away, Steiner's reading asks a sharper question of any institution: which of the three ideals is this for, and have we sent it to the right sphere?
Where to Read More