The act by which certain Cherubim refused their offered sacrifice, releasing the substance that gave backward beings independence, evil, and the ground of human freedom.
Cosmic Renunciation in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's name for a creative refusal at the heart of world-evolution. In The Spiritual Beings in the Heavenly Bodies and in the Kingdoms of Nature (GA 132, 1911), Steiner describes how, during ancient Sun, certain Cherubim renounced the sacrifice that the Thrones offered up to them. By rejecting what was given, these Beings rose into Eternity and immortality, while the rejected sacrificial smoke became free substance. Backward spirits, the Luciferic beings, took hold of that substance and became self-reliant. Steiner calls this schoepferischer Verzicht, creative renunciation: the deliberate, cosmic-moral act through which the gods called their own opponents into being. Renunciation here is not loss but the inner reality of ancient Moon, the source from which the possibility of evil, and with it human freedom and inner soul-independence, first entered the world.
In Steiner's Own Words
Thus, in cosmic evolution it is the case that the gods themselves called their opponents into being. If the gods had not renounced the sacrifice, beings would not have been able to oppose them. Put into simple words we may suppose the gods had foreseen as follows: 'If we merely go on creating as we have done from Saturn to Sun there would never be any free beings, capable of acting from their own initiative. In order that beings of this nature might come into existence, the possibility must be given for opponents to arise against us in the Universe, so that we should meet with resistance in that which is subject to time.'
What it Means Today
The strangest move in Steiner's GA 132 lectures is that he locates the origin of evil not in the so-called evil beings but in the good ones, the Cherubim, whose renunciation made backward spirits possible. A god who withholds power so that creatures can become free has a precise modern echo. In 1987, in the essay "The Concept of God after Auschwitz: A Jewish Voice" (published in the Journal of Religion, volume 67), the philosopher Hans Jonas argued for a self-limiting God: one who, at creation, renounced omnipotence and withdrew, surrendering power so that a genuinely independent world could exist and act on its own. Jonas drew on the Kabbalistic image of tzimtzum, the divine self-contraction that opens a space for what is not God. Steiner and Jonas reach the same structural insight from different traditions: freedom is not granted by an act of giving, it is granted by an act of holding back.
Thalira synthesis: Read together, GA 132 and Jonas suggest that the deepest creative gesture in any cosmology is subtraction, the willingness of a higher power to renounce its own reach so that something other than itself can stand, err, and choose.
Where to Read More