Ancient Myths and Their Meaning in Anthroposophy

Glossary Anthroposophy 3 min read
Ancient Myths and Their Meaning n.

Steiner's January 1918 Dornach lecture cycle (GA 180), which reads Egyptian and Greek mythology as the memory of real, older spiritual experience, not invention.

Ancient Myths and Their Meaning in Anthroposophy is the name given to Rudolf Steiner's lecture cycle of January 1918, delivered in Dornach and collected as GA 180, in which the great mythologies are read as the picture-memories of a real, older mode of human consciousness rather than as primitive invention or priestly allegory. Steiner takes the Osiris and Isis myth of Egypt and the three generations of Greek gods (Uranos, Kronos, Zeus) and shows that each preserves, in pictures, what humanity once experienced through atavistic clairvoyance before self-conscious thinking awoke. Mythology is therefore a record borne by the human soul itself: a natural science that is at the same time a science of the soul. The cycle answers the rationalist reading of Charles Dupuis, who saw the myths as fabrications, and it remains the foundation for studying any single myth within spiritual science today.

In the first days of January 1918, with Europe still at war, Steiner gave the Dornach lectures published as Ancient Myths and Their Meaning. Their claim is simple and startling: the myths of Egypt, Greece and Israel are not fables but memories. In them an older humanity recorded, in pictures, how differently it once stood within the cosmos, before thinking in abstract concepts began.

Myths contain profound truths that are more closely connected with reality than the truths expressed by modern science about this or that thing. Physiological and biological truths about human beings are contained in myths, and they are contained in myths in such a way that the emergence of what is expressed in the myth is based on an awareness of the unity of the human being as a microcosm with the macrocosm. In particular, if we consider the nature of mythical thinking, we can gain an idea of how deeply, or rather how shallowly, we are rooted in reality with our ordinary modern concepts. It is useful to recall how myths developed among neighboring peoples in pre-Christian times. The ancient Egyptians, the Greeks, and the Israelites were neighbors and often dependent on each other culturally.

Rudolf Steiner, Ancient Myths and Their Meaning (GA 180, lecture of 4 January 1918, Dornach)

Every evening of the cycle opens against a counter-position. In his Origine de tous les cultes (1795), Charles Dupuis had declared the myths to be priestly inventions, star-lore dressed up to keep the populace docile, and most modern textbooks still carry a softened version of that verdict: myth as pre-scientific guesswork. Steiner walks the opposite road. Because the Egyptians, Greeks and Hebrews retained remnants of an older picture-consciousness, their myths are testimony, the soul's own documentation of states it actually passed through. Read this way, the Osiris story records what it felt like when the old clairvoyance died away; the succession of Uranos, Kronos and Zeus holds three configurations of human consciousness in their real order.

The lectures were spoken a few steps from the first Goetheanum, then nearing completion, whose carved columns attempted the complementary gesture: not remembering old pictures but consciously making new ones. That pairing is the working method the cycle leaves behind. Take up a myth, ask not what its tellers imagined but what their mode of experience was, then test the picture against the stages of consciousness spiritual science describes. The myth stops being literature and becomes a historical document of the inner life.

Back to blog