Spiritual nature (Pixabay: 4144132)

Panpsychism: The Philosophy That Consciousness Is Everywhere

Updated: April 2026

Quick Answer

Panpsychism is the philosophy that consciousness is a fundamental feature of all matter, not something that emerged only in complex brains. From Greek pan (all) + psyche (mind). Supported by philosophers like Philip Goff and David Chalmers as a solution to the "hard problem" of consciousness. The oldest idea in philosophy, now the newest frontier in consciousness science.

Last Updated: March 2026

Key Takeaways

  • Panpsychism solves the hard problem by dissolving it: If consciousness is fundamental (like mass or charge), it does not need to "emerge" from non-conscious matter. The problem of how dead matter produces experience disappears if matter was never dead.
  • Philip Goff's argument: Galileo removed subjective qualities from the physical world (colours, sounds, tastes are "in the mind," not in matter). This made science possible but created the hard problem. Solution: reverse Galileo's error. Put consciousness back into matter at the fundamental level.
  • It does not mean rocks think: Panpsychism proposes that matter has some vanishingly minimal form of proto-experience, nothing like human thought. An electron does not have opinions. But its existence may involve something from the inside, however rudimentary.
  • Integrated Information Theory (IIT) provides a scientific framework: Tononi: consciousness = integrated information (phi). Any system with integrated information has some degree of consciousness. Human brains have very high phi. Simple systems have very low but nonzero phi.
  • This is the oldest philosophical idea, now the newest: Thales ("all things are full of gods"), the Stoic logos, Neoplatonic Soul, the Hermetic "The All is Mind." Contemporary panpsychism is a return to what the ancients knew: the universe is alive.

What Is Panpsychism?

Panpsychism (from Greek pan, "all," and psyche, "mind" or "soul") is the philosophical view that consciousness is a fundamental and ubiquitous feature of the physical world. Just as every particle of matter has mass and charge, every particle of matter has some form of experience or proto-consciousness.

This is not the claim that electrons think about philosophy or that thermostats have feelings. It is the claim that experience, in some extremely minimal and rudimentary form, is a basic property of the physical world. Human consciousness is not something that appeared out of nowhere when brains became complex enough. It is the highly concentrated, highly integrated form of a quality that exists in all matter, at every scale.

Why the Idea Is Counterintuitive (and Why That Does Not Matter)

Philip Goff: "You should judge a view not for its cultural associations but by its explanatory power." Einstein's relativity is counterintuitive (time slows down at high speed). Darwin's evolution is counterintuitive (species change through random variation). Quantum mechanics is counterintuitive (particles exist in multiple states until observed). The fact that panpsychism sounds strange is not an argument against it. The question is whether it solves a problem that other approaches cannot solve. And it does: it dissolves the hard problem of consciousness by denying that consciousness needs to "emerge" from something non-conscious.

The Hard Problem of Consciousness

David Chalmers, in 1995, distinguished between the "easy" problems of consciousness and the "hard" problem:

Easy problems (not actually easy, but in principle solvable with neuroscience): How does the brain process sensory information? How does it control behaviour? How does it integrate information from different senses? These are questions about mechanism: how the brain does what it does.

The hard problem: Why does physical processing in the brain give rise to subjective experience? Why is there "something it is like" to see red, taste chocolate, or feel pain? Even if we map every neuron and every synapse, we still do not know why the physical process produces an inner experience. You could build a perfect mechanical replica of a brain, and the hard problem would ask: does it feel anything? And how would you know?

Why the Hard Problem Is Hard

The hard problem is hard because it asks a "why" question about a "how" system. Neuroscience can explain how neurons fire, how signals propagate, how information is processed. It cannot explain why this processing is accompanied by experience. The analogy: you can explain everything about how a television works (circuits, pixels, signal processing) and still not explain why the picture looks like something to the person watching it. The picture on the screen is not the same as the experience of seeing the picture. The hard problem is the gap between the mechanism (the TV) and the experience (watching the show). Panpsychism closes the gap by saying: the experience was there all along. It did not need to be produced by the mechanism. It is a property of the material itself.

Galileo's Error: How We Lost Consciousness

Philip Goff's book Galileo's Error (2019) argues that the hard problem of consciousness is a direct consequence of Galileo's scientific revolution. Before Galileo, the physical world was understood to have both objective properties (shape, size, motion) and subjective qualities (colour, sound, taste, smell). Galileo stripped the subjective qualities from the physical world: colours, sounds, and tastes are not in matter. They are in the mind. Matter itself has only mathematical properties.

This move made modern science possible. By reducing the physical world to what can be measured and mathematised, Galileo created the framework for physics, chemistry, and eventually neuroscience. But the move had a cost: consciousness was removed from the physical world. And once consciousness is removed from the physical world, getting it back in becomes the hard problem.

Goff's solution: reverse Galileo's error. Consciousness was never separate from matter. It was always there, as a fundamental property. Galileo's framework is correct for describing the mathematical structure of the physical world. But it is incomplete: it describes the extrinsic, relational properties of matter (how things interact) but says nothing about the intrinsic nature of matter (what things are, from the inside). Panpsychism fills the gap: the intrinsic nature of matter is experience.

Does Panpsychism Mean Rocks Think?

No. This is the most common misunderstanding, and addressing it clearly is essential.

Panpsychism proposes a spectrum of consciousness:

Entity Level of Consciousness Analogy
Electron Vanishingly minimal proto-experience A single pixel, not a picture
Atom Slightly more integrated proto-experience A few pixels together
Rock Aggregated but not integrated; possibly less than its parts A pile of pixels, not arranged into an image
Plant Responsive, information-processing, possibly some minimal experience A simple pattern emerging from the pixels
Insect More integrated, sensory, goal-directed A low-resolution image
Mammal Rich emotional and sensory experience A detailed photograph
Human Self-reflective, conceptual, highly integrated A high-definition film with commentary

The key distinction: integration matters. A rock is an aggregate (a collection of atoms that are not highly integrated into a unified system). A brain is an integrated system (billions of neurons connected in a network that produces a unified experience). Panpsychism does not say that aggregates have rich consciousness. It says that the basic constituents of matter have some form of proto-experience, and that highly integrated systems (like brains) produce rich, unified consciousness from these basic constituents.

Integrated Information Theory: Consciousness as Phi

Giulio Tononi's Integrated Information Theory (IIT, first proposed in 2004) offers a scientific framework that is compatible with panpsychism. IIT's core claim: consciousness is identical to integrated information, symbolised as phi (Φ).

Integrated information = information generated by a system that is more than the sum of its parts. A system has high phi when its components are highly interconnected and the whole system generates information that cannot be reduced to the information generated by its parts independently.

  • A human brain: Very high phi. Billions of neurons, massively interconnected, generating a unified experience that cannot be reduced to the experience of individual neurons.
  • A photodiode: Very low phi. A single component that detects light. But nonzero phi: it integrates (minimally) the information of "light" and "no light."
  • A rock: Possibly very low phi, because its atoms are not highly interconnected in an integrative way. A rock may have less integrated consciousness than its individual atoms, because it is an aggregate rather than a system.

IIT is empirically testable (it makes predictions about which brain states are conscious and which are not), and it is being tested in neuroscience laboratories. It is also compatible with panpsychism: if consciousness is integrated information, and some degree of integrated information exists in all physical systems, then some degree of consciousness exists everywhere.

The Combination Problem: Panpsychism's Hard Problem

If panpsychism solves the original hard problem (how does consciousness arise from non-conscious matter? Answer: it does not; matter was always conscious), it creates a new one: the combination problem.

The combination problem: if electrons have micro-experiences, how do billions of micro-experiences combine to form the unified, rich macro-experience of a human mind? How does the proto-consciousness of individual particles add up to the experience of seeing a sunset, understanding a theorem, or feeling love?

Why Combination Is Hard

The problem is not just quantitative (how do many small experiences become one big experience). It is qualitative: your experience right now is unified. You do not experience billions of separate micro-experiences. You experience one smooth field of consciousness that includes sight, sound, thought, emotion, and body sensation, all integrated into a single "what it is like to be you." How does the multiplicity of micro-experiences produce this unity? No one knows. Several proposals exist (cosmopsychism: the universe itself is conscious, and individual minds are aspects of the cosmic mind; Russellian monism: micro-experiences are the intrinsic nature of physical properties, and combination happens through the same laws that govern physical combination). But the combination problem remains panpsychism's greatest challenge.

Ancient Roots: Thales to Spinoza to Whitehead

Panpsychism is not a modern invention. It is one of the oldest ideas in philosophy:

  • Thales (c. 624-546 BCE): "All things are full of gods." The first philosopher attributed mind or spirit to all of nature, not just to living things.
  • Anaxagoras (c. 500-428 BCE): Nous (mind) is the ordering principle of the cosmos. Mind is present in all things and is what gives them structure.
  • The Stoics (3rd century BCE onward): The cosmos is permeated by logos (rational order, divine reason). The logos is in everything: in the stars, in the earth, in the human soul.
  • Plotinus (c. 204-270 CE): The World Soul animates the entire cosmos. All matter participates in Soul, and through Soul, in Nous (Divine Mind), and through Nous, in the One.
  • Spinoza (1632-1677): Mind and matter are two aspects of one substance (God or Nature). Everything in the universe has both a physical aspect and a mental aspect. This is "dual-aspect monism," a sophisticated form of panpsychism.
  • Leibniz (1646-1716): The universe is composed of monads: simple, indivisible centres of perception. Every monad has experience. Physical objects are aggregations of monads.
  • William James (1842-1910): In "Does 'Consciousness' Exist?" (1904), James argued for a radical empiricism in which experience is the fundamental stuff of reality.
  • Alfred North Whitehead (1861-1947): Process philosophy. The basic units of reality are "occasions of experience": momentary events that have both a physical and an experiential dimension. This is panpsychism as process: reality is not made of things but of experiences.

The Modern Revival: Chalmers, Goff, Tononi, Koch

After decades of materialist dominance in philosophy of mind (the view that consciousness is identical to or produced by brain activity), panpsychism has experienced a significant revival in the 21st century:

  • David Chalmers: The philosopher who named the hard problem takes panpsychism seriously as one possible solution. He does not fully endorse it but argues that it deserves careful consideration: "there is no direct evidence against panpsychism, and there are indirect reasons for taking the view seriously."
  • Philip Goff: The most prominent contemporary defender. His Galileo's Error (2019) is the most accessible introduction to modern panpsychism. He argues that panpsychism is the simplest, most elegant solution to the hard problem.
  • Giulio Tononi: The neuroscientist behind IIT. While IIT is not identical to panpsychism, Tononi accepts that IIT's implications are panpsychist: "consciousness is everywhere, it's in everything."
  • Christof Koch: Former president of the Allen Institute for Brain Science. Koch has publicly embraced panpsychism through IIT, arguing that consciousness is a fundamental property of complex, integrated systems.

Panpsychism and the Hermetic Tradition

"The All Is Mind; the Universe Is Mental"

The first principle of the Hermetic tradition (from The Kybalion and the Corpus Hermeticum) is Mentalism: "The All is Mind; the Universe is Mental." This is panpsychism in esoteric vocabulary. The universe is not dead matter that accidentally produced consciousness. It is conscious reality that produces what appears to be matter. The Neoplatonic vision (the One emanating Nous, Nous emanating Soul, Soul animating matter) is the same insight expressed as metaphysics: consciousness is not a product of the physical world. It is the source of the physical world. For structured exploration of the Hermetic principles, including Mentalism, see the Hermetic Synthesis Course.

Recommended Reading

Buy Galileo's Error by Philip Goff on Amazon

*Thalira participates in the Amazon Associates program and earns from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

The Spiritual Meaning: A Conscious Universe

Panpsychism's spiritual implication is profound: you are not a conscious being in an unconscious universe. You are a conscious being in a conscious universe. The experience you are having right now (reading these words, feeling your body in the chair, hearing the ambient sound around you) is not an anomaly. It is the concentrated, highly integrated form of a quality that pervades all of reality.

The stars are not dead. The earth is not dead. The atoms in your body are not dead. Something is happening, from the inside, at every level of physical reality. Your consciousness is the most complex and integrated version of this something. But it is not the only version. It is one expression of a universal quality.

Look at the world around you. The cup on the table. The tree outside the window. The light on the wall. Panpsychism says: something is happening in all of it. Not thought. Not feeling. Not anything you would recognise as mind. But something. A flicker. A quality of existence from the inside. The universe is not a dead stage on which the drama of consciousness is performed. The universe is the drama. The stage is alive. The matter is aware. And you, with your rich, integrated, self-reflective consciousness, are the universe knowing itself, at this particular point, in this particular body, at this particular moment. You are not in the universe. You are the universe, experiencing itself.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is panpsychism?

The philosophy that consciousness is a fundamental feature of all matter, like mass or charge. From Greek pan (all) + psyche (mind). Does not mean rocks think. Means that experience, in some vanishingly minimal form, is a basic property of the physical world.

What is the hard problem of consciousness?

Chalmers (1995): Why does physical brain processing produce subjective experience? Neuroscience explains how neurons fire but not why firing feels like something. Panpsychism dissolves the problem: consciousness does not "arise" from matter. It is already there.

Who are the main philosophers?

Historical: Thales, Spinoza, Leibniz, William James, Whitehead. Contemporary: Chalmers (takes it seriously), Goff (defends it in Galileo's Error), Tononi (Integrated Information Theory), Koch (neuroscientist embracing panpsychism through IIT).

Does it mean rocks are conscious?

Not like humans. Rocks are aggregates (not highly integrated systems). They may have less integrated consciousness than their individual atoms. A brain has very high phi (integrated information). A rock has very low phi. Panpsychism is about a spectrum, not an on/off switch.

What is Integrated Information Theory?

Tononi (2004): Consciousness = integrated information (phi). Any system whose whole is more than the sum of its parts has some degree of consciousness. Human brains: very high phi. Photodiodes: very low phi. Compatible with panpsychism: some phi exists in all systems.

What is Goff's argument?

Galileo removed consciousness from matter to make science possible. This created the hard problem. Solution: reverse the error. Put consciousness back into matter as a fundamental property. The simplest, most elegant solution: consciousness was never separate from matter.

What is the combination problem?

Panpsychism's biggest challenge: if particles have micro-experiences, how do they combine into the unified macro-experience of a human mind? Solves the original hard problem but creates a new one. Several proposals exist. No consensus yet.

How does it relate to ancient philosophy?

Thales ("all things are full of gods"), Stoic logos, Neoplatonic Soul, Spinoza's dual-aspect monism. The oldest philosophical position. The contemporary revival is a return to what the ancients assumed: the universe is alive and aware.

How does it relate to the Hermetic tradition?

"The All is Mind; the Universe is Mental." The first Hermetic principle (Mentalism) is panpsychism in esoteric vocabulary. The universe is not dead matter that produced consciousness. It is conscious reality that produces what appears to be matter.

What is the spiritual meaning?

You are not a conscious being in an unconscious universe. You are a conscious being in a conscious universe. The universe is not a dead stage. The stage is alive. You are the universe experiencing itself at this particular point, in this particular body, at this particular moment.

Who are the main philosophers of panpsychism?

Historical: Thales (6th century BCE, 'all things are full of gods'), Spinoza (17th century, mind and matter are two aspects of one substance), Leibniz (monads as centres of perception), William James (radical empiricism), Alfred North Whitehead (process philosophy, 'occasions of experience'). Contemporary: David Chalmers (who takes panpsychism seriously as a solution to the hard problem), Philip Goff (Galileo's Error, the most accessible contemporary defence), Giulio Tononi (Integrated Information Theory), and Christof Koch (neuroscientist who has embraced panpsychism through IIT).

Does panpsychism mean rocks are conscious?

Not in the way humans are conscious. Panpsychism proposes that rocks (and electrons, and atoms) have some extremely minimal form of experience or proto-consciousness, so rudimentary that it has almost nothing in common with human consciousness. A rock does not think, feel, or have opinions. But something about its existence, from the inside, may involve a vanishingly basic form of 'what it is like to be.' The analogy: a thermostat has a state (on or off) that responds to temperature. That state is not human consciousness. But it is a form of sensitivity to the environment. Panpsychism extends this idea to all matter.

What is Philip Goff's argument for panpsychism?

In Galileo's Error (2019), Philip Goff argues that Galileo's revolution (separating the objective, mathematically describable properties of matter from the subjective qualities of experience) created the hard problem of consciousness. By removing consciousness from the physical world, Galileo made it impossible to explain how consciousness arises from matter. Goff's solution: reverse Galileo's error. Put consciousness back into matter at the fundamental level. The result is panpsychism: consciousness is not something that emerges from complex matter. It is a basic feature of all matter.

How does panpsychism relate to ancient philosophy?

Panpsychism is one of the oldest philosophical ideas. Thales (6th century BCE): 'All things are full of gods,' suggesting that the natural world is permeated by mind or spirit. Anaxagoras: nous (mind) is the ordering principle of the cosmos. The Stoics: the universe is permeated by logos (rational order). Plotinus (Neoplatonism): all reality emanates from the One, and Soul pervades the material world. Spinoza: mind and matter are two aspects of one substance (dual-aspect monism). The contemporary revival of panpsychism is, in many ways, a return to the oldest position in Western philosophy.

How does panpsychism relate to the Hermetic tradition?

The Hermetic Corpus teaches that the cosmos is alive, conscious, and permeated by divine mind (Nous). The first Hermetic principle (Mentalism): 'The All is Mind; the Universe is Mental.' This is panpsychism in esoteric vocabulary: consciousness is not a product of matter but a fundamental feature of reality. The Hermetic tradition, Neoplatonism, and contemporary panpsychism share the same core insight: the universe is not dead matter that accidentally produced consciousness. It is conscious matter that produces everything else.

Is panpsychism scientific?

Panpsychism is a philosophical position, not a scientific theory in the strict sense (it does not make specific, falsifiable predictions). However, it is taken seriously by neuroscientists (Tononi, Koch) and is compatible with current physics (which describes the behaviour of matter but says nothing about its intrinsic nature). Chalmers argues that there is no direct evidence for or against panpsychism, but there are 'indirect reasons, of a broadly theoretical character, for taking the view seriously.' The strongest indirect reason: panpsychism avoids the hard problem by denying that consciousness needs to 'emerge' from something non-conscious.

What is the spiritual meaning of panpsychism?

Panpsychism teaches that you are not a conscious being in an unconscious universe. You are a conscious being in a conscious universe. The consciousness you experience is not an anomaly, a freak accident of evolution, or a by-product of brain complexity. It is a fundamental feature of reality itself, concentrated in you but present everywhere. The spiritual implication: the universe is not dead matter that you observe from the outside. It is alive, aware, and you are part of its awareness. When you look at the stars, something in the stars is, in some minimal sense, looking back.

Sources & References

  • Goff, Philip. Galileo's Error: Foundations for a New Science of Consciousness. Pantheon, 2019.
  • Chalmers, David J. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press, 1996.
  • Tononi, Giulio. "An Information Integration Theory of Consciousness." BMC Neuroscience 5.42 (2004).
  • Koch, Christof. The Feeling of Life Itself: Why Consciousness Is Widespread but Can't Be Computed. MIT Press, 2019.
  • Skrbina, David. Panpsychism in the West. MIT Press, 2005.
  • Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality. Free Press, 1929/1978.
  • Strawson, Galen. "Realistic Monism: Why Physicalism Entails Panpsychism." Journal of Consciousness Studies 13.10-11 (2006): 3-31.
Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.