Neither Wolf Nor Dog by Kent Nerburn: A Complete Review

Overview and Background

Kent Nerburn is a Minnesota writer and sculptor with a doctorate in religious studies from the Graduate Theological Union in Berkeley. His earlier book, Native American Wisdom, brought him a letter from a Lakota elder that changed the direction of his writing life. The elder, whom Nerburn calls Dan, said something like: you have done a decent job with the words of our ancestors. Now come and listen to a living one.

The resulting book, Neither Wolf Nor Dog: On Forgotten Roads with an Indian Elder, was published by New World Library in 1994. It won the 1996 Minnesota Book Award and has remained in print for more than thirty years. A feature film adaptation, shot on location at the Pine Ridge Reservation with a largely Native cast, was released in 2016 to strong reviews from Indigenous critics, an unusual distinction for a film based on a book written by a white author about Native American experience.

The book is part memoir, part road narrative, part philosophical dialogue, and part elegy. It has qualities of the great spiritual road narratives, Jack Kerouac's On the Road, Laurens van der Post's African books, but with a different purpose. Where those books use the road as a space for self-discovery, Nerburn uses it as a space for something more demanding: learning to listen to someone whose experience of America has been nothing like his own.

Dan is presented as a composite figure. Nerburn has said in interviews that he changed names and merged details to protect the privacy of real people who trusted him. The conversations are real in substance even if the exact words and circumstances have been shaped for the book. This matters for understanding what the book is: not a documentary record but a faithful literary rendering of a relationship and what it taught.

View on Amazon

The Title and What It Names

The phrase "neither wolf nor dog" appears in the book when Dan is explaining the impossible situation of Native Americans in contemporary America. A wolf is wild, free, living by its own laws, taking its sustenance from the land on its own terms. A dog is domesticated, fed by its owner, loyal to the household, useful in the terms its owner sets. Both are real options. Neither is available to the Native American.

The land that sustained the wolf's life has been taken. The traditional structures, the seasonal migrations, the ceremonies tied to specific places and times, the kinship networks of the band, have been disrupted beyond repair in most cases. Going back is not possible because the back to which one might go no longer exists.

But the dog's life, full assimilation into white American culture, requires the abandonment of identity in ways that many Native people are not willing to accept. It requires accepting that what was taken was legitimately taken, that the stories one was raised with are myth rather than history, that the land is property rather than relative. These are not small concessions. They are the abandonment of an entire way of perceiving the world.

Dan speaks about this with a specificity that cuts through the usual abstractions. He is not theorizing about colonialism; he is describing his own experience of being asked, in a thousand small ways every day, to choose between a wolf that no longer exists and a dog he refuses to become.

Land, Property, and Belonging

The longest and most philosophically dense section of the book concerns land. Dan returns to this theme repeatedly, approaching it from different angles on different days, as if circling something that requires multiple passes before its shape can be seen.

The Western concept of land as property, Dan argues, is not merely a different legal framework. It is a different ontology, a different account of what land is. In property law, land is a commodity with definite boundaries, capable of being owned, transferred, divided, and exploited. Its value is instrumental: what can be extracted from it or built upon it.

In the Lakota understanding, land is a relative. This is not a metaphor. When Lakota people say the land is their grandmother or their mother, they mean something literally true: that the relationship between a people and the specific land they have lived with for generations is a relationship of mutual belonging, care, and obligation. The land feeds and shelters the people; the people tend and speak for the land.

The legal machinery of colonization, the treaties, the land cessions, the allotments, the termination policies, were all predicated on the Western concept of land as property and therefore transferable. From Dan's perspective, this was like trying to sell your grandmother. The transaction cannot be legitimate because the thing being sold is not, in any meaningful sense, a commodity.

The environmental philosopher Holmes Rolston III has argued that the Western tradition does contain resources for thinking about the intrinsic value of nature, not everything in that tradition reduces nature to commodity. But Dan's point is specifically historical: whatever philosophical resources might theoretically be available, the actual practice of the Western civilization he has encountered has been extractive, boundary-drawing, and exploitative.

The Teaching of Silence

One of the book's most practically useful lessons concerns silence. Nerburn is a talker and a writer, someone trained to fill silence with words, to move conversations forward with questions, to make things legible by naming them. Dan's first lessons are about unlearning this.

Dan does not say much in their early meetings. He serves coffee, looks out the window, sits with Nerburn in silence for stretches that Nerburn finds increasingly uncomfortable. When Dan finally speaks, it is not in the mode of a professor dispensing information. He says something and stops. He waits. He is watching whether Nerburn has the capacity to receive what is offered rather than immediately converting it into the next question.

This is a pedagogical practice with deep roots in Lakota tradition. The anthropologist Edward Hall documented in The Silent Language (1959) and The Dance of Life (1983) that different cultures have profoundly different norms about silence in conversation. In many Indigenous North American cultures, silence is not a gap in communication but a form of it, a sign that something important has been said and deserves to be held before responding. In the dominant Anglo-American culture, silence is typically a void to be filled, an uncomfortable signal that something has gone wrong.

Nerburn gradually learns to wait. He learns that some of Dan's most important statements come only after he has proven, by his silence, that he is capable of receiving them. And he learns that the road trip itself is partly a lesson in this: the long silences between Rapid City and the Badlands, between one reservation town and another, are part of the teaching, not interruptions of it.

The Selling of Sacred Ceremonies

Dan's anger is most visible on the subject of what he calls the selling of ceremonies. He is referring to the commercialization of Native American spiritual practices, non-Native people paying to participate in sweat lodges, vision quests, naming ceremonies, and other practices that in traditional contexts were not commodities at all.

His objection is not simply territorial, not "these are ours and you can't have them." It is more precise than that. The sacred ceremonies of Lakota tradition are not separable from the specific relationships, obligations, and community structures that give them meaning. A sweat lodge ceremony conducted for paying strangers by someone who has extracted the practice from its context is not the same thing as a sweat lodge conducted within the traditional network of reciprocal obligations. It has the same physical form but a different spiritual substance, like a word used in a context that drains it of its meaning.

He is also angry because he sees this as a continuation of the pattern of extraction. The land was taken first. Then the children, through boarding schools designed to eliminate language and culture. Then the ceremonies, through suppression. Now, with legal suppression no longer possible, the ceremonies are being taken through the market: packaged, sold, and consumed in forms that serve the buyer's spiritual needs while doing nothing for the communities from which the practices come.

The scholar Philip Deloria explored the longer history of this pattern in Playing Indian (1998), documenting how Americans have repeatedly used the image and practices of Native Americans to construct alternative American identities, from the Boston Tea Party through the Boy Scouts to New Age spirituality, in ways that served the dominant culture while remaining indifferent or harmful to actual Native people.

Wounded Knee Revisited

Late in the book, Dan and Nerburn stop at Wounded Knee. There is a small memorial marker at the mass grave where the victims of the 1890 massacre are buried. Tourists visit. There are signs.

Dan says almost nothing. He stands at the marker for a long time. Nerburn, who by this point has learned something about silence, stands with him. He does not try to find words for what he observes in Dan's face. He does not offer condolence or interpretation. He simply stands.

Afterwards, Dan says: "You can't understand this. You shouldn't try. Just remember that it happened."

This is one of the book's most important moments. Dan is not inviting Nerburn into his grief; he is telling him, with some kindness, that there are forms of suffering that cannot be crossed by goodwill or education. They can only be acknowledged, from the appropriate distance. Nerburn's job is not to understand but to witness, and witnessing means accepting the limits of what he can access from where he stands.

The philosopher Emmanuel Levinas wrote extensively about the ethical significance of the face of the other, the encounter with another being whose suffering and dignity cannot be reduced to your categories of them. The Wounded Knee scene in Neither Wolf Nor Dog is a practical demonstration of this: Nerburn is confronted with a face of grief that will not let itself be made comprehensible, and his only ethical response is to stand in that incomprehension without flinching.

The Ethics of Cross-Cultural Listening

One of the questions the book raises most directly is: what does it mean for a white writer to tell a story that involves Native American voices and experiences? Is it appropriation? Is it necessary? Who benefits?

Nerburn is self-aware about these questions in a way that many earlier writers in this space were not. He includes Dan's corrections and criticisms of Nerburn's interpretations. He includes moments where Dan refuses to explain himself further, or where Nerburn's attempts to articulate what he has learned are met with gentle or not-so-gentle redirection. The book's narrative structure itself enacts the lesson: Nerburn is not the authority here. He is the student, and an imperfect one.

The Indigenous Studies scholar Kim TallBear has argued that the ethical obligation of non-Native writers engaging with Indigenous communities goes beyond good intentions. It requires sustained relationship, genuine accountability to the community being written about, and willingness to be told no. By these standards, Nerburn's book holds up reasonably well. The film adaptation, made with Dan's family's approval and with Native actors in all leading roles, is part of what makes the project legible as a genuine collaboration rather than extraction.

Why This Book Matters

Neither Wolf Nor Dog endures for a simple reason: it is honest about things that are usually hidden. It is honest about what colonization actually did and continues to do to living people. It is honest about what Indigenous wisdom actually requires of the person who wants to receive it. And it is honest about the limits of cross-cultural understanding, the places where the only appropriate response is silence and respect rather than comprehension and assimilation.

For spiritual practitioners, this is important in a specific way. The contemporary spiritual marketplace is full of Indigenous-adjacent practices, drumming circles, vision quest programs, sweat lodge weekends, smudging kits sold in crystal shops. Dan's anger at the commodification of ceremony is a direct address to this phenomenon, and it deserves to be heard before any of those products are purchased or practices adopted.

This does not mean that non-Native people cannot be genuinely enriched by engagement with Indigenous wisdom. Braiding Sweetgrass, Black Elk Speaks, and this book all demonstrate that such engagement is possible and valuable. What Dan is insisting on is the difference between genuine engagement, which requires relationship, accountability, and willingness to be changed, and consumption, which extracts what is useful and discards the rest.

The Hermetic tradition Thalira is rooted in has its own language for this distinction. The true student of wisdom does not acquire knowledge as a possession; they become a vessel for it. The teacher gives what the student is prepared to receive, and preparation requires not just intellectual readiness but the kind of inner quiet that makes genuine reception possible. Dan's insistence on silence as a prerequisite for teaching is, in this light, a pedagogical principle that cuts across cultural lines.