An Introduction to Zen Buddhism by D.T. Suzuki: An Honest Review

🕑 15 min read

What This Book Is

The Eastern Buddhist Society published An Introduction to Zen Buddhism in Kyoto in 1934. It is short, roughly 130 pages, written in English by a Japanese author for readers with no background in Buddhism at all. A German edition followed in 1939 with a preface by Carl Jung, and English printings have carried that preface since.

Its influence is difficult to overstate. For four decades it was the book a curious Westerner was handed, and its formulations became the common furniture of everything written about Zen afterwards. Alan Watts read it. The Beat writers read it. Eugen Herrigel's Zen in the Art of Archery carries an introduction by the same author, which is what made that book authoritative.

The chapters are brief and self-contained: what Zen is and is not, its relation to Buddhism generally, satori, the koan, the practical discipline of the monastery, and the meditation hall.

What Suzuki Argues

The book's central move is a series of denials, and they are what readers remember.

Zen is not a philosophy, because it does not proceed by argument and reaches no propositions. It is not a religion in the ordinary sense, because it has no God to worship and no doctrine to affirm. It is not mysticism as Europeans use the word. It is not quietism, and it is not nihilism despite the emptiness language.

What it is, on Suzuki's account, is a direct seeing into one's own nature, transmitted outside the scriptures, which cannot be conveyed in words and must be undergone. The event of that seeing is satori, and the whole apparatus of Zen exists to make it possible.

He is consistently emphatic that reasoning is the obstacle rather than the route. The intellect divides, and the seeing he describes is prior to division, so any attempt to reach it by thinking moves in the wrong direction. This is why Zen literature is full of the illogical: shouts, blows, apparently absurd answers, a finger held up in place of a doctrine.

The prose is vigorous and the anecdotes are wonderful, which is a large part of why the book worked. Suzuki writes English with a slightly formal Edwardian cadence and an instinct for the arresting example.

The Koan Chapters

The strongest material in the book is on the koan, and it is worth reading even if you take nothing else.

A koan is a phrase or a recorded exchange handed to a student, of the kind everyone has heard: the sound of one hand, the dog and buddha-nature, the original face before your parents were born. In the Rinzai school it is the spine of formal training.

Suzuki's contribution is to explain what the device is for. The student is required to produce an answer and every answer the reasoning mind supplies is rejected. Over months the effort accumulates into a state of intense, frustrated concentration that the tradition calls the great doubt, and the resolution, when it comes, arrives by collapse rather than by solution. The koan is a machine for exhausting a specific faculty.

He is also clear that this happens inside a relationship. The koan is worked in repeated private interviews with a teacher who can see whether the student is performing an answer or has stopped performing. Our collection of Zen koans gathers the classic cases, and the point Suzuki makes is that reading them is not the practice.

The Anecdotes, and Why They Work

Half the book's power is in the stories, and it is worth being clear about what they are.

They come from the recorded sayings literature of Chinese Chan, compiled largely in the Song dynasty, which collected exchanges attributed to teachers of the earlier Tang period. A monk asks a serious doctrinal question and the master answers with a pointless-seeming remark about a cypress tree in the courtyard, or three pounds of flax, or by shutting a door on the questioner's leg.

Suzuki presents these as evidence that Zen operates outside the intellect. Historians of Chan read them differently and with equal interest. The recorded sayings are a literary genre with its own conventions, compiled centuries after the events they describe, serving purposes of lineage and school identity as well as teaching. The Tang masters of these stories are in part characters constructed by Song editors.

Both readings can hold at once. The exchanges are genuinely doing something, and the something has a documentable history rather than descending from a wordless transmission. A reader who takes the anecdotes as verbatim transcripts of enlightened spontaneity has made the same error that produces every other misreading in this article.

Jung's Uneasy Preface

Carl Jung's preface, written for the German edition of 1939, is the most interesting document bound into the book, and it does something readers rarely expect from a foreword. It hedges.

Jung takes the material seriously and reads satori through his own framework, treating it as a breakthrough of the unconscious into consciousness that reorganises the whole personality. He compares it to what he had observed in individuation and to accounts of transformation in Western mystics.

Then he warns. He is explicit that Zen grew in a culture with centuries of preparation behind it, that the European psyche has a different history and different defences, and that a Westerner who imitates the outward forms without that ground is likely to produce something other than what the tradition produces. He questions whether a European can undergo this at all in the form described.

The Man and the Illinois Years

Daisetz Teitaro Suzuki lived from 1870 to 1966, which is to say from before the full Meiji transformation of Japan to the year the Beatles played Tokyo. Understanding what he was doing requires knowing where he stood.

He trained under Shaku Soen, a Rinzai teacher who had represented Japanese Buddhism at the World's Parliament of Religions in Chicago in 1893. Suzuki was a lay practitioner rather than an ordained priest, a distinction with real consequences for how he understood and presented the tradition.

In 1897 he went to LaSalle, Illinois, to work for Paul Carus, a German-American publisher and philosopher with a project of reconciling religion and science. Suzuki stayed eleven years, translating, editing and absorbing the intellectual currents of American religious liberalism. He married Beatrice Lane, an American with Theosophical connections.

So the man who explained Zen to the West spent his formative adult decade inside a Western publishing house devoted to demonstrating that religion could satisfy a scientific age. That is not a discrediting fact. It is the essential context for what he wrote afterwards.

The Argument That Changed the Field

Beginning in the early 1990s, Robert Sharf published work that reframed how scholars read Suzuki, most influentially an essay called "The Zen of Japanese Nationalism", which appeared in History of Religions in 1993 and then in Donald Lopez's collection Curators of the Buddha.

The argument has several parts and they are worth separating.

Zen as presented here is modern. Suzuki's Zen belongs to a Meiji reform movement, sometimes called New Buddhism, that was responding to a specific crisis. Japanese Buddhism in the late nineteenth century was under state pressure and under Western criticism as superstition. The reformers answered by presenting Buddhism as rational, experiential, compatible with science, and free of the ritual and clerical apparatus the critics objected to. Suzuki's insistence that Zen has no doctrine, no scripture and no dependence on institutions is a move within that argument.

The emphasis on experience is imported. Sharf's sharpest point is that treating religion as fundamentally a matter of unmediated personal experience is itself a modern Western position, developed by Schleiermacher and given its most influential form by William James. Suzuki, working in that intellectual world, presented Zen in exactly those terms. Classical Chan and Zen texts are far more concerned with lineage, monastic conduct and doctrinal position than that framing suggests.

The nationalism is present. Suzuki and others of his generation argued that Zen expressed something distinctively Japanese, connecting it to the sword, to tea, to art, and to the national character. That claim served a nationalist purpose in the period it was made, and it is the origin of the entire genre of books linking Zen to Japanese cultural forms.

What Is Missing From the Picture

The gap between this book and a Japanese Zen temple is the practical consequence of all this.

Institutional Zen in Japan is highly ritualised. There is chanting, there are robes and precise forms for every movement, there is a strict hierarchy, and a great deal of the actual work of the priesthood concerns funerals and memorial services for parishioner families. Training in a monastery is a matter of years of regulated conduct in which spontaneity is the last thing on offer.

Almost none of this appears in Suzuki's account, which describes a tradition of iconoclasts breaking through convention. Both descriptions can be found in the literature, since Chan texts do contain the shouting masters. The difference is proportion: the iconoclasm is a genre of story told within a heavily regulated institution, and Suzuki gave Western readers the stories without the institution.

The result is a recognisable pattern of disappointment. Readers arrive at a Zen centre expecting paradox and encounter a schedule, a bell, a form for entering the hall, and instructions about which foot goes first. Our guide to zazen covers what the practice actually consists of.

The Wartime Question

An honest review has to note this and to note that it is contested.

Brian Victoria's Zen at War, published in 1997, documented extensive institutional support for Japanese militarism among Zen organisations before and during the Second World War, including statements by prominent teachers. The institutional record it assembles is not seriously disputed and it is disturbing reading.

Victoria also criticised Suzuki's own wartime writings. That specific charge has been contested at length. Scholars including Sato Kemmyo Taira and Kirita Kiyohide have argued that Victoria's translations of Suzuki are inaccurate and that passages were read against their context, and have pointed to Suzuki's criticism of state Shinto and of militarist thinking.

The fair summary is that the institutional history is established, that Suzuki's personal position remains argued among specialists, and that a reader should know both facts rather than either one alone.

Which Book to Read

This one for the historical document and for the koan chapters, in an evening.

Suzuki's Essays in Zen Buddhism, in three series, for the substantial scholarship this book compresses. It is where his actual work is.

Zen Mind, Beginner's Mind if you want to practise rather than to understand. Shunryu Suzuki teaches from inside Soto and gives instructions rather than explanations.

The Zen Teaching of Huang Po for the primary Chinese material, which reads very differently from any account of it.

The Way of Zen for the most capable popularisation, written by someone who had read Suzuki closely and had his own agenda.

Who Should Read It

Read it as a primary source in the history of how Buddhism reached the West. On that basis it is essential and nothing replaces it.

Read the koan chapters for their own sake.

Read Jung's preface twice, because it is the part that turned out to be right.

Do not read it as a description of Japanese Zen as an institution, and do not read it as an account of what Chan was in China. For those, go to the scholarship.

Frequently Asked Questions