The Union Of The Two Points in Anthroposophy

Glossary Anthroposophy 3 min read
The Union Of The Two Points n.

An Atlantean turning point when a point in the etheric head sank into its physical counterpart, and human beings could first say I.

The Union Of The Two Points in Anthroposophy is the occult anatomical event by which self-consciousness first entered human beings during the Atlantean epoch. Rudolf Steiner described it in At the Gates of Spiritual Science (GA 95), the Stuttgart cycle of 22 August to 4 September 1906, in the lecture of 31 August. The etheric body of the Atlantean still extended far beyond the physical head. Within that etheric head lay one significant point, and it corresponded to a point inside the physical head. Across long stretches of Atlantean evolution the two drew together, until the etheric point sank into the physical one. At the instant they coincided, a human being could say I to himself, and the forepart of the brain became an instrument for the spirit. Steiner placed the first occurrence among Atlanteans living near present-day Ireland, and the settled condition among the fifth sub-race, the primal Semites. Today it is read alongside Julian Jaynes as a dating of self-awareness.

The Union Of The Two Points names a single moment in Steiner's account of Atlantis, not a doctrine and not a practice. Before it, the Atlantean lived inside a wide etheric head, dream-clairvoyant at night, unable to count. After it, the word I became possible. Steiner treats the change as anatomical, a coincidence of two points, and traces every later capacity of the reasoning mind back to it.

The etheric body of an Atlantean extended far beyond and around his head. In the etheric body there was an important point which corresponded with a point in the physical head. In the course of Atlantean evolution the two points drew together, until the point in the etheric body sank into the physical. At the moment when these two points coincided, man could begin to say “I” to himself. The forepart of the brain could now develop as an instrument for the spirit; self-consciousness began. All this happened first among those Atlanteans who dwelt in the neighbourhood of modern Ireland.

Rudolf Steiner, At the Gates of Spiritual Science (GA 95, lecture of 31 August 1906, Stuttgart)

Julian Jaynes made the same wager in public, from the opposite direction. In The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind (Houghton Mifflin, 1976), the Princeton psychologist argued that introspective self-awareness is not a species trait but a historical acquisition, and that as late as the second millennium BCE people did not experience an inner I so much as obey voices they took for gods. Jaynes read the Iliad for his evidence: Homeric characters are prompted, pushed, and instructed, and they rarely deliberate. He located the change in language and in the two hemispheres rather than in an etheric body, and he dated it to the Bronze Age collapse rather than to Atlantis, so the two accounts are not interchangeable. What they share is the claim itself, that the word I has a birthday.

Thalira synthesis: Steiner and Jaynes both refuse the assumption that self-consciousness is the floor of human experience, and both make the forebrain a late-arriving instrument rather than the origin of the self.

The practical consequence is a reading habit. Ancient texts that seem to lack a first person, the Homeric epics, the older strata of the Vedas, the oldest layers of Genesis, stop looking primitive and start looking accurate. Steiner asks the reader to hear the Atlantean night, when instruction arrived from outside and memory did the work that argument does now. Jaynes asks the reader to hear Agamemnon.

Back to blog