In Steiner's GA 196, the higher sense organs do not produce perception; they exist so that the I can know that perceiving is happening.
The Senses as Organs of Ego Awareness in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's teaching that the higher sense organs, the eye and the ear above all, do not produce perception but exist so that the I can know that perceiving is taking place. Steiner states it in the lecture of 13 February 1920 in Dornach, printed in Spiritual and Social Changes in the Development of Humanity (GA 196), where he writes on the blackboard: higher sensory organs are not there to mediate sensory processes, but so that an I knows about sensory processes. The visual process itself is far less bound to the eye than intellectual activity is to the brain; the organ is a receiving apparatus switched into a current, like a Morse station on a telegraph line. Because the I entered the human being only during Earth evolution, the organs formed on Earth serve ego awareness, a claim that speaks directly to present-day debates in the philosophy of perception.
When Steiner told his Dornach audience that we do not have eyes to see, he inverted the whole physiology of perception. The senses as organs of ego awareness names that inversion: the eye and ear are stations switched into processes they do not create, and their real work is to let an I know that seeing and hearing are happening at all.
In Steiner's Own Words
Our sense organ of sight has nothing to do with seeing, but everything to do with the fact that our I knows about seeing. Sensory organs, as we have them today, that is, the higher sensory organs, are not there for seeing, but rather they are there so that the I can know about seeing. I would even like to write this sentence on the board: Higher sensory organs are not there to mediate sensory processes, but rather so that an I knows about sensory processes. We have the three so-called higher soul activities: memory, intelligence, and sensory perception and activity. The I is involved in them; it is most strongly involved in the memory with its physical body, less strongly in the intelligence, and least strongly in the sensory activity.
What it Means Today
Forty-six years after this Dornach lecture, the Cornell psychologist James J. Gibson published The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems (Houghton Mifflin, 1966), a book whose title could stand as a caption for Steiner's blackboard sentence. Gibson had studied aviators' vision for the United States Army Air Forces during the Second World War, and the work convinced him that the textbook account of perception, a retinal picture relayed inward and assembled by the brain, does not describe what perceivers actually do. He recast the senses as active perceptual systems: eye, head, and body together pick up information that already exists in the structured ambient light rather than manufacturing sensations from raw stimulation. In The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (1979) he sharpened the point: perceiving is an act of the whole living being, not an event inside an organ.
The convergence with GA 196 is real but partial. Gibson moved the content of seeing out of the eye and into the environment; Steiner had moved it out of the eye and into a process in which the I takes part. Thalira synthesis: Gibson relieves the organ of making the world, Steiner relieves it of making the seeing, and what remains to the eye in both accounts is its one true office, to make a knower present at processes it never produced. A reader who wants to work with the term can begin there: in any act of looking, distinguish the thing seen, the seeing, and the one who knows that seeing is occurring.
Where to Read More