Steiner's term for the only economically real part of ownership: the power to decide how land and the means of production are used.
What is the Right of Disposal?
The Right of Disposal in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's replacement for the concept of ownership: the concrete power to decide how land, buildings, and the means of production shall be used. Speaking to the employees of the Waldorf-Astoria factory in Stuttgart on 23 April 1919, in the lectures collected as The Reorganization of the Social Organism (GA 330), Steiner argued that ownership as such has no meaning in political economy at all, that it survives as an illusion which comforts bourgeois minds, and that everything real inside it reduces to one right, the Verfügungsrecht. Because it is a right and not a commodity, it belongs to the middle member of the threefold social organism, the democratic rights sphere, where every person counts equally, rather than to economic life, where it can be bought. The modern application is steward-ownership, which detaches voting control from financial return in company law.
The right of disposal is what remains of property once the sentiment is stripped away: the authority to say what a field, a factory, or a machine is for. Steiner treats that authority as a human relationship between people, not a bond between a person and a thing, which is why he asks the state to administer it and forbids economic life to sell it.
In Steiner's Own Words
The same applies to property law as to labor law. You see, ultimately the foundations of all present-day property can be traced back to old conquests, to old military enterprises; but that has changed. In terms of political economy, the concept of ownership makes no sense at all. It is a pure illusion. It only exists to appease certain bourgeois minds. In terms of political economy, what does the concept of ownership mean? It means only one right, namely, the right of disposal over property, land, and the means of production. The right of disposal must be placed in the competence of the state, just as must the right of labor. You can only do this if you remove all economic and intellectual powers from the state.
What it Means Today
The clearest living test of Steiner's distinction is steward-ownership, the ownership form Armin Steuernagel named in 2015 and built into legal templates through Purpose in Hamburg, with the Stiftung Verantwortungseigentum founded in November 2019 to link the German companies using it. A steward-owned company splits what ordinary share ownership fuses. Voting rights, the right of disposal in Steiner's sense, are held by people actively working in or responsible for the enterprise, and cannot be sold. Economic rights, the claim on profit, are capped and passed to investors or to a purpose-bound foundation. The oldest working example predates Steiner: Ernst Abbe placed the Carl Zeiss works into the Carl Zeiss Foundation in Jena in 1889, so that no heir could ever sell them. Robert Bosch GmbH runs on the same split today, with the charitable Robert Bosch Stiftung holding the great majority of the capital while the voting rights sit in a separate trust company.
Thalira synthesis: steward-ownership arrives at Steiner's conclusion from the opposite end, by contract rather than by constitution, which is why it works company by company and cannot yet do what he asked, namely lift the right of disposal out of purchase altogether and hand it to a democratic body that answers to everyone the enterprise touches.
Read this way, the term changes the question one asks about any business. It stops being who owns this, and becomes who may decide, how were they chosen, and can that decision be bought.
Where to Read More