Steiner's rule that some questions are premature for the whole age, and that a manufactured answer destroys the true one.
The Occult Necessity of Waiting in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's rule that an occult question can be asked too early, and that the honest response to a premature question is silence rather than an answer. He stated it in Stuttgart on 16 October 1911, in the lecture printed in Images of Occult Seals and Columns: Munich Congress 1907 (GA 284), having already given it at Karlsruhe that same month during the cycle From Jesus to Christ (GA 131). The rule has two halves. A question can be premature not only for the person asking but for the whole age, so that no living researcher yet holds the answer. And the intellect is always ready to supply something, so that in a trained occultist the manufactured answer arrives wearing the feel of real perception. Such an answer is worse than ignorance, because it occupies the place where the true answer would later have stood.
The occult necessity of waiting names a discipline rather than a mood. Steiner asks the student to hold a question open instead of closing it with whatever the reasoning mind can assemble. The waiting stays active: study continues, effort continues, but the conclusion is left unwritten until it arrives as intuition rather than as construction. Steiner calls the alternative resignation, the refusal to think a thing out.
In Steiner's Own Words
For this reason I said in the course of lectures at Karlsruhe that an essential thing in occultism is: to be able to wait. Particularly one who perhaps has undergone a certain development must be able to do this, and most of all one who has reached a certain height of occult development. When a person considers it extremely important to answer a question at a certain time, the intellect, which is always ready to answer, may very easily conjure up an answer, even from the feeling of a trained occultist. This answer is not only false or insufficient, but it takes away for a long time the possibility of a coming to the right answer at all, hence it is necessary to be able to wait until one is favoured with an answer from the spiritual world.
What it Means Today
Psychoanalysis arrived at the same rule from the opposite direction. In 1967, in a short paper called Notes on Memory and Desire published in the Psychoanalytic Forum, Wilfred Bion instructed analysts to enter every session without memory and without desire: no rehearsal of the previous hour, no wish for a particular outcome, no reaching for the interpretation that would settle the discomfort. Bion's reasoning was clinical rather than occult. An interpretation offered early, he argued, is assembled from the analyst's own store rather than received from the patient, and once spoken it becomes the thing the patient answers. The real material then has nowhere left to appear. Bion placed this restraint under the name John Keats gave it in a letter of December 1817, negative capability, the capacity to stay in uncertainty without irritable reaching after fact and reason.
Thalira synthesis: Steiner and Bion describe one skill in two vocabularies, and the skill is not patience but abstention, the deliberate refusal to let a competent faculty do work that belongs to a slower one. In practice that means keeping the question written down, dated, and unanswered, returning to it rather than resolving it. A question you can leave open for a year without anxiety is a question you are ready to have answered.
Where to Read More