The Feeling of Oneness with the World in Anthroposophy

Updated: August 2026
Glossary Anthroposophy 4 min read
The Feeling of Oneness with the World n.

The knowledge, raised into consciousness, that every deed leaves a residue binding us to everything we have touched: we belong to the world as a finger belongs to the body.

The Feeling of Oneness with the World in Anthroposophy is the conscious form of a knowledge that normally works below the threshold of waking life: wherever our being has united with another being in action, even an inanimate one, something remains, and that residue establishes a permanent relationship between us and everything we have ever been connected with. Rudolf Steiner described the feeling in Earthly Death and Cosmic Life (GA 181), a Berlin lecture cycle of 1918, where he paired it with universal gratitude as the second of two soul moods that let the living build a bridge to souls between death and rebirth. Raised into consciousness, it becomes the felt certainty of belonging to a living whole as a finger belongs to the body. Steiner held that this feeling, still subconscious in our fifth cultural epoch, must become the moral foundation of the sixth, and deep ecologists work with its close cousin today.

The feeling of oneness with the world names the moment when a subconscious kinship becomes conscious knowledge: every deed we have ever performed, even upon lifeless things, binds us permanently to what we acted upon. Steiner presented it in Berlin in March 1918, in the middle of the war, as the soul mood that lets the living and the dead find one another again.

The other direction of feeling is that we must unite our own ego with every being with whom we have anything to do in life. Our actions extend to other beings, some, it may be, even inanimate; but wherever we have done anything, wherever our being has been united with another in action, something remains; and this remainder establishes a permanent relationship between our being and everything with which we have ever been connected. This feeling of kinship is the foundation for a deeper one, a feeling generally unrecognised by the higher soul; a feeling of oneness with the surrounding world.

Rudolf Steiner, Earthly Death and Cosmic Life (GA 181, lecture of 26 March 1918, Berlin)

In 1973 the Norwegian philosopher Arne Naess published a short paper in the journal Inquiry, "The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement," and gave environmental thought its most demanding school: deep ecology. Naess spent the following decades arguing that environmental ethics fails as long as it treats nature as something outside us that we ought to protect. In his 1986 lecture at Murdoch University in Perth, "Self-Realization: An Ecological Approach to Being in the World," he proposed the ecological self: maturity means widening identification until the boundary of the self takes in the living world, so that defending a forest becomes self-defense rather than altruism. Joanna Macy later built group practice on the idea in what became The Work That Reconnects.

Steiner reaches the same country from the opposite border. Naess asks for an act of identification, a deliberate widening of sympathy. Steiner, in the 1918 Berlin lectures, points to something already accomplished beneath consciousness: the residue of every deed has long since woven us into the whole, and the work is not to manufacture the feeling but to raise an existing fact into awareness. Thalira synthesis: what deep ecology asks us to imagine, anthroposophy says we have already done; the ecological self is not an empathy to perform but a ledger of deeds to read, and karma is its accounting. A practitioner can begin where Steiner began: walk across a street, then picture yourself still walking there. The exercise sounds small. It is the feeling of oneness caught in the act.

Back to blog