Steiner's warning from GA 117 (1909): when memory of past lives awakens, souls that never formed an individual I will recall only a group-ego, a new Fall of mankind.
The Fall into Group-Soulness in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's name for a coming counterpart of the ancient Fall of Genesis, described in the Munich lecture of 4 December 1909 published in GA 117, The Ego: The God Within and the God of External Revelation. As humanity approaches the sixth post-Atlantean epoch, the faculty of remembering former incarnations begins to open. A soul that has worked an individual I into itself during earlier lives will look back and recognize itself as a distinct individuality. A soul that has not will remember only a group-ego: it will feel itself assigned to a category that dictates how it thinks, feels, and wills, and the stamp of that group will show in its very countenance. Where the first Fall was suffered unconsciously, this one is felt consciously, which is why Steiner calls it terrible. Sociologists studying other-directed conformity describe the same trajectory in present-day terms.
Rudolf Steiner placed a strange mirror at the far end of human evolution. The Fall into Group-Soulness names what awaits souls who reach the age of returning memory without an individuality to remember. Where early humanity rose out of group-souls without grief, future humanity can sink back into them knowingly, directed by the group in thinking, feeling, and willing, and wearing its imprint on the face.
In Steiner's Own Words
If one has not cultivated it, it is not there as an inner human being; one looks back, and remembers as a group-ego, what one had in common. So that these people will say: Yes, I was there, but I have not freed myself. These people will then experience that as their FALL, as a new Fall of mankind, as a falling back into conscious connection with the group-soul. That will be something terrible for the sixth period of time; to be unable to look back to oneself as an individuality, to be hemmed in by not being able to transcend the group-soulness [Gruppenseelenhaftigkeit].
What it Means Today
Four decades after this Munich lecture, American sociology arrived at its own map of the territory. In The Lonely Crowd (Yale University Press, 1950), David Riesman, writing with Nathan Glazer and Reuel Denney, distinguished the inner-directed character, steered by an internalised gyroscope set early in life, from the other-directed character, steered by radar tuned to the peer group. Riesman watched mid-century Americans shift from the first type to the second: taste, opinion, and ambition increasingly supplied by the surrounding cohort rather than formed within. His book sold over a million copies and gave postwar readers a vocabulary for the uneasy sense that their preferences were arriving from outside.
The parallel with Steiner is close but not identical. Riesman described a social drift within one lifetime; Steiner described a biographical fact becoming a karmic one, carried across incarnations and eventually written on the body. Thalira synthesis: the Fall into Group-Soulness is other-direction made permanent, Riesman's radar hardened into an organ, so that what sociology records as a reversible style of conformity Anthroposophy reads as a settling of the soul's form which only work on the individual I can loosen. Steiner's practical counsel in the same lecture is plain: thoughts about the spiritual world, grasped by one's own thinking rather than absorbed from a category, crystallise the I that later remembers itself. Every act of genuinely independent judgment, on this reading, is quiet preparation for the sixth epoch.
Where to Read More