Steiner accepted Engels's claim that managing goods should replace ruling people, but insisted the ruling held human relations together and must be rehoused, not deleted.
The Administration of Things and the Government of Persons in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's answer to the formula Friedrich Engels set out in Socialism: Utopian and Scientific (1880), that the administration of things and the direction of production processes take the place of the government of persons. Writing in the essays collected as The Renewal of the Social Organism (GA 24), Steiner grants half of it. Modern economic life has grown to a size where its administration can no longer also govern the people working inside it, and capital must not command the human spirit that steers the economy. He refuses the other half. The old governing was not only oppression: it regulated relations between people, and those relations do not order themselves once economic administration lets them go. Steiner's conclusion is the threefold social organism, where a separate rights sphere governs persons and a free cultural sphere renews the spirit that guides production.
The administration of things and the government of persons names a single sentence of Engels that Steiner treated as the hinge of the whole social question. He agreed that economic management must stop ruling people. He denied that the ruling could simply be deleted, because something inside it was holding human relations together, and that work has to be given somewhere else to live.
In Steiner's Own Words
One such demand is widely held to be that which Friedrich Engels expressed in his book “The Development of Socialism from Utopia to Science” with the words: “The administration of things and the management of production processes take the place of the government of persons.” Numerous leaders of the proletariat, and with them the proletarian masses themselves, profess the view from which this statement originated. It is correct from a certain point of view. The human contexts from which modern states have developed have formed administrations which not only regulate things and production processes, but also govern the people employed in the branches of production and with the things. The administration of things and branches of production comprises economic life.
What it Means Today
Engels expected the administration of things to be politically harmless, a matter of inventory rather than command. Shoshana Zuboff's The Age of Surveillance Capitalism (PublicAffairs, 2019) documents where that expectation collapses. Zuboff argues that platform firms extract behavioural surplus from ordinary use, sell predictions about people into behavioural futures markets, and then improve those predictions by shaping the behaviour itself. She calls the resulting form of power instrumentarian, separating it from the older totalitarian kind: it needs no terror and no belief, only the apparatus. It administers data, devices, and interfaces. What it produces is a government of persons that no one voted for and no statute names.
That is Steiner's objection with a century of evidence behind it. He wrote in 1919 that lifting governance out of the economic sphere does not abolish governance, it only moves it out of sight, because relations between people still need regulating and the economy will keep regulating them by default. Ride-hailing drivers dispatched by routing software, warehouse staff paced by handheld scanners, and moderators ranked by opaque quality scores are governed by systems whose formal description is the administration of things.
Thalira synthesis: the test Steiner offers is not whether an institution calls itself economic, but whether the person standing inside it can appeal to a right the institution did not write. Where no such appeal exists, things are not being administered; persons are being governed under another name.
Where to Read More