Steiner's teaching that a soul may return for a brief childhood incarnation to form one member left unfinished, chiefly the feeling life, then depart.
Re-embodiment After Child Death in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's account of why a soul that dies stillborn or in early childhood returns to earth, and what so short a life accomplishes. He set it out in a lodge lecture of 9 October 1903 in Berlin, printed in Theosophy and Occultism (GA 90c) under the German heading Wiederverkörperung bei Kindestod. Steiner was answering a question put to him directly: do the souls of stillborn or deceased small children rejoin the ordinary rhythm of roughly 1500 to 1800 years between lives, and does such a return serve any purpose? His answer separates two cases. A full incarnation waits out the long interval because the earth itself must change before there is anything substantially new to learn. A short childhood incarnation is a different instrument, a supplementary return taken to build up one member that the previous life left unformed.
Re-embodiment after child death is the narrowest and most consoling case in Steiner's doctrine of repeated earth-lives. A life of weeks or years is not a failed incarnation on his reading. It is a targeted return, undertaken for one formative purpose, and it closes when that purpose is served rather than when the body gives out.
In Steiner's Own Words
In childhood, the soul of the child has weak, soft powers that still need to be developed and refined. If you were unable to develop the astral body in one incarnation, it is possible that you will be reborn as a child for the sole purpose of developing the emotional body. A scholar who has a highly developed mind but no feelings will then only need a short period of tutoring as a child and will soon leave the body again. An attempt to be born can also fail. Then a new attempt is made if the previous body was unable to express the forces. There are even examples in the Bible where re-embodiment occurs immediately after death. It is important to know that re-embodiment not only has a purpose, but that it is a necessity.
What it Means Today
The nearest thing to an empirical test of this claim sits in a university psychiatry department. Ian Stevenson, who chaired psychiatry at the University of Virginia and founded the research unit now called the Division of Perceptual Studies in 1967, spent four decades collecting cases of small children who spoke about a previous life. His first major volume, Twenty Cases Suggestive of Reincarnation, appeared in 1966. Jim B. Tucker, who succeeded him at Virginia, kept the files and summarised them for general readers in Life Before Life in 2005.
Two features of that archive bear on the 1903 lecture. The interval between the earlier death and the reported rebirth is often startlingly short, months rather than the long Devachan passage Steiner assigns to ordinary lives. The previous personalities also skew heavily toward people whose lives were cut off early. Stevenson argued no metaphysics; he argued that the cases resist easy explanation and deserve a record.
Thalira synthesis: Steiner and Stevenson approach the same anomaly from opposite ends, Steiner from the reason a short return would be undertaken and Stevenson from its statistical footprint, and where the two meet is the proposal that brevity marks purpose rather than accident.
For a bereaved parent the residue is small and exact. Steiner makes no claim about any particular child. He offers a frame in which the length of a life and its completeness are separate measurements.
Where to Read More