An induced sleep-like state in which one person's will overrides another's I. Steiner warned it breaches the freedom that genuine inner development demands.
Hypnotism in Anthroposophy is the artificial induction of a sleep-like state in which one person's will suppresses the independent I of another, opening the subject to suggestion. Rudolf Steiner traced its history in his lecture of 6 June 1904 in Berlin, The History of Hypnotism and Somnambulism (GA 52), from the Jesuit Athanasius Kircher and Franz Anton Mesmer through the Nancy School of Liebeault and Bernheim. Steiner judged it spiritually dangerous because it violates the freedom of the I that genuine occult development requires, where the pupil keeps full waking self-possession. Modern clinical ethics echo this concern, anchoring hypnosis in informed consent and the patient's retained agency.
In Steiner's Own Words
If you are a bad person, in a certain sense an inferior person, and you exert a hypnotic influence on your fellow human beings, you harm them. If you want to exert such an influence in an appropriate manner, so that comprehensive cosmic forces are not tainted in a harmful way, then you must be familiar with the secrets of higher spiritual life, and you can only do that if you have developed your power to a higher level. It is not a matter of experimenting here and there. These phenomena are ones that are constantly being exercised around us. You cannot enter a room without interactions taking place in that room, if other people are in it, which are analogous to what takes place in hypnotic phenomena under other circumstances.
What it Means Today
Steiner's 1904 worry, that hypnotism transfers control of one human will to another, became the founding ethical problem of modern hypnotherapy. The clearest scholarly map of this lineage is Adam Crabtree's From Mesmer to Freud: Magnetic Sleep and the Roots of Psychological Healing (Yale University Press, 1993), which traces the unbroken thread from Mesmer's Paris salons through the Nancy School that Steiner names, to Freud's early use of suggestion. Crabtree documents exactly what troubled Steiner: the magnetic operator could direct the subject's behavior, memory, even perception, while the subject's own self stood aside. Contemporary practice has answered that danger not by denying the phenomenon but by fencing it with consent. The British Society of Clinical and Academic Hypnosis and the American Society of Clinical Hypnosis both require that hypnosis proceed only with informed, revocable agreement, and that the client retain the power to refuse any suggestion. The trance is treated as a collaboration the subject can end at will, never as a takeover.
Thalira synthesis: where mainstream ethics protects the subject by contract, Steiner protected the operator's soul, holding that only one who has raised the whole self through moral and spiritual schooling can wield such influence without harm, because the unprepared hypnotist taints both lives at once. For the path of inner development, the practical lesson is plain: any genuine exercise must leave the pupil in full waking self-possession, never displacing the I that freedom depends on. A discipline that dims your own consciousness so another can steer it runs against the grain of Anthroposophical training, where every step is taken in clear, self-directed awareness rather than surrendered to a second will.
Where to Read More