Steiner's dramaturgical law that some material tolerates only novelistic treatment: drama needs characteristic moments closing into a whole, and poets who ignore the boundary produce dramatized novellas.
The Boundaries of Epic and Dramatic Art in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's dramaturgical law that epic and dramatic form are separated by an objective limit in the material itself: certain subject matter tolerates only a novelistic treatment and can never succeed on the stage. Steiner set out the principle in 1898 in the Dramaturgische Blätter, the theatre journal he edited in Berlin, in essays now collected in GA 29, Collected Essays on Drama 1889-1900, written while reviewing Friedrich Spielhagen's theory of epic and dramatic technique. Drama, he argued, must present prominent, characteristic moments that close into an artistic whole with a beginning, middle, and end; the epic writer may unfold every link in a development, the dramatist may not. Poets who ignore this boundary produce dramatized novellas, plays smothered in epic detail that cannot live on stage. Theatre scholars still work with the same distinction when they analyze modern drama.
The Boundaries of Epic and Dramatic Art names a limit Steiner insisted no playwright can cross unpunished. Reviewing Berlin theatre in 1898, he watched naturalist poets pour novelistic material onto the stage and concluded that the failure was lawful, not accidental. Epic narration and dramatic action are distinct artistic organisms, and a story built for one form withers inside the other, however talented its author.
In Steiner's Own Words
One basic error is that one believes one can say everything one wants to say with the means of drama. A deeper aesthetic education, however, will always lead to the recognition of the truth that certain material can only tolerate a novelistic and not a dramatic treatment. Drama cannot tolerate material that is only suitable for novellistic treatment. That is why some modern dramas are only dramatized novellas. Such shortcomings in the material, or in the treatment of a material, result in dramatic structures that leave us unsatisfied because important things are missing that are necessary if we are to fully understand what happens in the course of the dramatic action. And when the playwright endeavors to bring such things, we see on the stage what we cannot tolerate on it.
What it Means Today
Steiner's boundary law reads like an early diagnosis of what drama theory spent the next century confirming. In 1956 the literary scholar Peter Szondi published Theorie des modernen Dramas (translated by Michael Hays as Theory of the Modern Drama, 1987), a study of exactly the period Steiner was reviewing from his Berlin editor's desk. Szondi argued that between about 1880 and 1950 the inherited dramatic form fell into crisis because playwrights kept forcing epic content (narration, memory, social panorama) into a form built for present, person-to-person action. His witnesses, Ibsen, Chekhov, Hauptmann, belong to the same naturalist generation whose premieres Steiner attended as a critic. Where Steiner in 1898 called the result dramatized novellas, Szondi traced how the pressure finally broke the form open and produced Bertolt Brecht's epic theatre, which stopped apologizing for narration and built it into the performance itself. The two accounts share the diagnosis and part over the remedy: Szondi historicizes the boundary, Steiner treats it as lawful.
Thalira synthesis: in Steiner's later work the dramaturgical observation turns inward, epic and dramatic become two gestures of consciousness, narrating what has become against willing what is becoming, and his four Mystery Dramas (1910-1913) are his own attempt at drama whose action is inner development without any collapse back into narration. A writer weighing a script today can still apply the 1898 test: if the material only breathes in description, it wants to be prose.
Where to Read More