Steiner's name for the central rift in modern economy: making goods has become a collective act, while needing them stays stubbornly individual.
Collective Production and Individual Consumption in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's name for the structural rift he found at the centre of modern economic life: technical complexity has made the making of goods a collective act, while the needing of goods stays, by natural necessity, individual. He set it out in the lecture The Central Question of Economic Life, given at Kristiania (Oslo) on 30 November 1921 and gathered in GA 79, Die Wirklichkeit der höheren Welten. The German poles are der Kollektivismus der Produktion and das Individualistische der Konsumtion. Steiner held that the widening abyss between the two, rather than wages or ownership taken alone, is the real social question, and that Marxist economics misread it by treating collectivism as a natural necessity to be completed rather than a one-sidedness to be balanced. His practical answer was the threefold social organism, with an economic sphere run by associations where producers and consumers judge together.
Collective production and individual consumption names a mismatch Steiner watched harden through the nineteenth century. A coat, a rail line, a loaf of bread now passes through hundreds of hands, yet the need for it arises in one person, out of one biography. Steiner argued that no economy can be read honestly until this asymmetry is faced, because every socialist demand he heard in the workers' schools came from the consumption side of the ledger.
In Steiner's Own Words
Over against the life of production stands the life of consumption. But the life of consumption can never become collective by itself. In consumption the individual actually by natural necessity stands as an individuality. From the personality of the human being, from the human individual, the needs of the total consumption arise. Therefore beside the collectivism of the production the individualism of consumption remained. And starker and starker became the abyss, deeper and deeper became this abyss between the production aiming for collectivism and the ever more demanding just by contrast ever more demanding interest of consumption.
What it Means Today
The clearest working answer to Steiner's abyss did not come from a parliament, it came from a farm. In 1986, at Temple-Wilton Community Farm in Wilton, New Hampshire, the German biodynamic farmer Trauger Groh, working with Anthony Graham and Lincoln Geiger, asked a group of households to do something economically strange: to look at the farm's whole annual budget before a seed went in, pledge freely against it, and share whatever the season gave. Groh and Steven McFadden set out the reasoning in Farms of Tomorrow (1990), published by the Biodynamic Farming and Gardening Association.
The move looks small and is not. It stops treating food as merchandise bought by a private appetite and puts the consumer inside production, carrying the weather risk beside the grower. Consumption stops being a verdict delivered alone at a checkout and becomes a decision made in company, which is close to the associative judgement Steiner described at Kristiania sixty-five years earlier. Thalira synthesis: Community Supported Agriculture is the abyss closed at household scale, the one place where an ordinary person can practise Steiner's economics with a chequebook instead of a theory. Temple-Wilton is still running, the oldest continuous CSA in the United States, and the pattern has travelled far past biodynamics, into thousands of farms across North America and Europe, and alongside the Japanese teikei movement that reached a similar shape from its own roots. Membership asks for no belief in spiritual science. It asks for the willingness to know who grows the food, and to accept that a bad year is shared.
Where to Read More