Steiner's teaching in GA 301 that feeling lives in the breath and blood rhythm, not the nerves, so soul life is shared like air, never sealed inside the skin.
Breathing as the Shared Soul Life in Anthroposophy is Rudolf Steiner's teaching that feeling does not sit in the nervous system but in the rhythmic organism, the breath, blood circulation, and lymph, and that this seat makes soul life communal rather than private. In Lecture II of The Renewal of Education (GA 301, delivered in Basel on 21 April 1920), Steiner argues that the doctrine of sense and motor nerves seals each person inside the skin, able to reach others only through sense impressions, and he reads the antisocial mood of postwar Europe as that theory become a general feeling. Because everyone in a room breathes the same air, a soul life reconnected to breathing is held in common, as air is. Waldorf teachers apply this by building the school day on rhythm, alternating concentration and release so a class breathes, and feels, together.
Breathing as the Shared Soul Life names the social turn in Steiner's physiology. If feeling lived in the nerves, every person would be a sealed vessel, making impressions on other sealed vessels. Steiner seats feeling in breath and circulation instead, and the picture reverses: the air in a lecture hall is one air, and the feeling life carried on it is one life, shared by all who breathe it.
In Steiner's Own Words
We really would be separated in spirit and soul from one another if, when we met, all our feeling and willing developed within our nerves, enclosing us completely within our skin. Modern people have that feeling, and the increasingly antisocial condition prevalent in modern Europe is a true representative of that feeling. There is, however, another possibility. We are all sitting together in this hall. We all breathe the same air; we cannot say that each of us is going around enclosed in our own box of air. We breathe the air together. If we limit our soul life to the nervous system, then we are isolated. Someone who, for example, connects breathing with the soul makes the soul into something we have in common. Just as we have the air in common, we also have our soul life in common when we reconnect it with the rhythmic organism.
What it Means Today
In July 2013, Björn Vickhoff and colleagues at the Sahlgrenska Academy of the University of Gothenburg published a study in Frontiers in Psychology titled "Music structure determines heart rate variability of singers." They fitted Swedish choir singers with heart monitors and had them hum a tone, sing a hymn, and chant a slow mantra together. When the singers shared one musical phrase they shared one breath, and through the breath their heart rates began to rise and fall together: structured song turned a room of separate bodies into a single slowly oscillating system.
This is Steiner's argument run as an experiment. The unison did not pass from nerve to nerve, and no sense impression carried it; it travelled through the rhythmic organism, breath entraining pulse, exactly the channel where Lecture II seats the feeling life. Choir singers have always reported a fellow-feeling that conversation cannot produce, and Vickhoff's monitors display the shared rhythm that carries it. Thalira synthesis: an antisocial age is not healed at the level of opinion, where nerve meets nerve across a gap, but at the level of rhythm, so every practice that gives a group one breath, in song, verse, or festival, quietly rebuilds the shared soul life Steiner named in Basel.
Where to Read More