The older spiritual path that wore the body down through pain until the spirit could perceive, replaced in Steiner's teaching by strengthened thinking and will.
Asceticism as a Path of Knowledge in Anthroposophy is the older route to spiritual perception in which the physical body was trained through pain, fasting, and mortification until its activity was dulled enough for soul and spirit to become directly perceptible. Rudolf Steiner described it in the third lecture of his Oxford course of August 1922, published in English as The Spiritual Ground of Education (GA 305), setting it beside the path of yoga as a discipline belonging to an earlier age. The body is what the old path worked on, from outside, so that thinking and willing might loosen from it, and its historical setting is the hermit, whose withdrawal from ordinary life counted as the precondition of higher knowledge. Steiner held the method unusable for modern people and put a reversal in its place: thinking and will made strong enough to render the body transparent while the student stays inside working life.
Asceticism as a path of knowledge names a discipline Steiner treated with respect and then declined to recommend. The old ascetic worked on the body from outside, wearing down its claims until the spiritual world showed through it, the way light shows through an eye that asks nothing for itself. The modern student, Steiner argued at Oxford in August 1922, has to work from inside instead, and stay in the world while doing it.
In Steiner's Own Words
He rendered the body weak so that will and cognition should arise out of the weakened body, and the body should be translucent to the spiritual world. We must make our will strong, and make strong our powers of thought, so that they may be stronger than the body, which goes on its own way; and thus we shall constrain the body to be transparent to the world of spirit. We do the precise opposite of the ascetics of old.
What it Means Today
Pierre Hadot, who held the chair of Hellenistic and Roman thought at the College de France from 1982, spent a career arguing that ancient philosophy was not first of all a body of doctrine but a set of spiritual exercises. His essays, collected in French as Exercices spirituels et philosophie antique (1981) and in English as Philosophy as a Way of Life (Blackwell, 1995, translated by Michael Chase), recover the plain sense of the Greek askesis: training, the way a runner trains, not self-punishment. In Epictetus, and in the private notebooks of Marcus Aurelius, Hadot found exercises of attention, of judgement, of the view from above. Every one of them worked on thinking rather than on flesh.
Set beside GA 305, Hadot's recovery makes Steiner's reversal look less like a break with the ascetic tradition than a return to what the word first meant. Steiner asks the student to review his own habits, sympathies, and antipathies, then to picture deliberately what he intends to be in ten years and to hold that picture with iron will. The work falls on thinking and willing, and the body is left fit for ordinary employment. Anyone taking this up now will recognise the discipline as closer to Marcus Aurelius at his writing desk than to a hermit in a cell.
Thalira synthesis: the old ascetic never wanted the pain, he wanted the silence the pain bought him, and Steiner's reversal keeps the silence while changing the currency, paying for it with strength rather than with suffering.
Where to Read More