The carved forms spanning the gap between two columns of the first Goetheanum, each one holding the relationship between two neighbouring cultures.
Architrave Motifs in Anthroposophy is the name Rudolf Steiner gave to the carved wooden forms that spanned the space between one column and the next inside the first Goetheanum at Dornach, Switzerland. Steiner described them across five lectures published as The Dornach Building (GA 287), given in October 1914 while the carving was still under way. Each column capital carried the character of a single European cultural community, and the architrave above the gap carried the relationship between the two communities standing on either side of it. Read in sequence from west to east, the capitals and architraves together form a continuous statement about how the peoples of Europe stand toward one another, which Steiner said could be read like a special kind of palmistry. The carvings burned with the first Goetheanum on 31 December 1922, and survive today in Steiner's models, drawings, and photographs.
Architrave motifs are the sculptural language of the between. In the first Goetheanum, seven pairs of carved columns rose from west to east, and above each pair the architrave arched across the opening. Steiner treated that arch as the carrier of a relation, not of a thing: what one people holds toward its neighbour, given wooden form and set overhead where the visitor must look up to read it.
In Steiner's Own Words
They should look at the various twists and turns and motifs that are pronounced there, and they will recognize the different spiritual relationships of the individual nations. Not a single motif is left to chance; rather, with each motif, one must ask: what does it signify? When you see this motif, see how it transitions into that of the third column, it simultaneously expresses what stands between the peoples who have a relationship with the two columns. You can read the inner structural relationships of the spiritual life of the peoples from these column and architrave motifs.
What it Means Today
The claim that the real unit of architecture is a relationship, not an object, reached mainstream design theory six decades after Dornach. Christopher Alexander, Sara Ishikawa, and Murray Silverstein published A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction with Oxford University Press in 1977, and its opening argument is that a pattern names a recurring relationship between elements and their context, never a component you can lift out and stock in a catalogue. Alexander pressed the point again in The Timeless Way of Building (Oxford University Press, 1979): a building lives or fails to live according to the quality of its joins, its thresholds, its transitions from one condition to the next. A doorway is not a hole in a wall, it is the negotiated relation between inside and outside, and the surveys behind the book were gathered from towns on several continents precisely because the pattern travels while its local expression does not.
Steiner had built that thesis into wood in 1914. His capitals are the local expression, particular to Italian, French, British, Central and Eastern European soul-life. His architraves are the pattern, the thing that recurs in the space between. Thalira synthesis: an architrave is a pattern language written in the accusative case, since it can only say what one culture does toward another, never what either one is by itself. For anyone studying the first Goetheanum photographs today, that gives a practical instruction: stop cataloguing the seven capitals and start reading the six spans between them.
Where to Read More