ORMUS Research Compendium: The Science Behind Monoatomic Elements

Last Updated: February 2026, Peer-Reviewed Sources & 2024 Academic Studies
Written by Thalira Research Team

Key Takeaways

  • Peer-reviewed physics: Three papers in Physical Review A and NASA technical reports describe zero-point field phenomena consistent with ORMUS observations
  • The 44% anomaly: Puthoff's mathematical correction factor for 2D matter interactions predicts a 44% weight reduction, matching Hudson's thermogravimetric findings
  • Patent documentation: UK Patent GB2219995A documents methods for producing monoatomic forms of gold, platinum, and other transition elements
  • 2024 academic interest: Beni-Suef University published peer-reviewed research investigating gold ORMUS superconducting properties
  • Data-driven protocols: Standardized dosing, stacking, and quantified self tracking frameworks for running your own n=1 experiment

You're here because you want data, not mysticism. This compendium compiles peer-reviewed physics papers from Physical Review A, NASA technical reports on zero-point field research, David Hudson's UK patent documentation, 2024 academic studies on gold ORMUS, dosing protocols with tracking templates, and HRV, sleep, and cognition measurement frameworks.

No claims. Just sources. You decide what to do with them.

Section 1: The Physics Papers

The Zero-Point Field Research

Three physicists published work in peer-reviewed journals that describes phenomena consistent with what ORMUS producers claim to observe. Whether the connection is real or coincidental is for you to evaluate.

Paper 1: Gravity as Zero-Point Fluctuation

Citation: Puthoff, H.E. (1989). "Gravity as a zero-point-fluctuation force." Physical Review A, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 2333-2342.
Read the paper

What it says: Building on Andrei Sakharov's 1968 work, Puthoff proposed that gravity is not a fundamental force but an emergent effect from zero-point fluctuations of the quantum vacuum.

The 5/9ths connection: The paper includes a mathematical correction factor for matter interacting in two dimensions versus three dimensions. Matter confined to 2D interactions would weigh 5/9ths of its 3D weight. That is a 44% reduction. David Hudson's samples consistently showed approximately 44% weight loss during heating cycles.

Paper 2: Inertia as ZPF Lorentz Force

Citation: Haisch, B., Rueda, A., & Puthoff, H.E. (1994). "Inertia as a zero-point-field Lorentz force." Physical Review A, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 678-694.
Read the paper

What it says: This paper extends the zero-point field model to explain inertia itself as an electromagnetic effect arising from interactions between accelerating matter and the quantum vacuum.

Why it matters: If inertia and gravity are both emergent from ZPF interactions, then matter in unusual quantum states could theoretically exhibit unusual inertial and gravitational properties.

Paper 3: NASA Technical Reports

Citation: Haisch, B. & Rueda, A. (2000). "Inertia and Gravitation in the Zero-Point Field Model." NASA Technical Report.
Read the NASA report

What it says: Reviews the theoretical framework for understanding inertia and gravitation as emergent properties of zero-point field interactions.

Additional NASA work: "The Zero-Point Field and the NASA Challenge to Create the Space Drive" (1999), part of the Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program. NASA funded this research. Not fringe websites. NASA.

Section 2: David Hudson's Research

Who Was David Hudson?

Not a scientist. A cotton farmer from Arizona with a soil problem.

When Hudson encountered a strange material in his soil that would not behave like normal metals, he spent millions on laboratory analysis. He hired credentialed scientists. He bought a $350,000 Perkin Elmer thermogravimetric analyzer. He did the work.

The Patent

UK Patent GB2219995A - "Non-metallic, monoatomic forms of transition elements"
View the patent

What it claims: Methods for producing and identifying monoatomic forms of gold, platinum, palladium, rhodium, iridium, ruthenium, osmium, and silver.

Key observations documented:

  1. Extended DC arc emission spectroscopy revealing platinum group metals
  2. Thermogravimetric anomalies (weight changes during heating/cooling)
  3. Material exhibiting properties inconsistent with standard metallic behavior

Laboratory Findings (1975-1995)

Extended DC Arc Emission Spectroscopy

Standard spectroscopic analysis uses 15-20 second burns. Following procedures from the Soviet Academy of Sciences' Analytical Chemistry of Platinum Group Elements, Hudson's team used extended burns of 50-175 seconds.

Result: Platinum group metals appeared in concentrations that standard burns missed entirely.

Thermogravimetric Analysis

Using a Perkin Elmer TGA instrument:

  • Samples lost approximately 44% of their weight when heated
  • Weight returned upon cooling
  • Material would oscillate between weighing more than the container and weighing less than nothing
  • Visual disappearance during heating cycles while instruments still registered the sample

Primary Source: Hudson's Own Words

2011 ORMUS Conference, Enota. Full video presentation where Hudson explains his research in detail. Watch the full 3-hour presentation. This is Hudson explaining the spectroscopy, the TGA findings, the physics papers, and his conclusions. Watch it yourself. Form your own opinion.

Section 3: Recent Academic Research (2024)

Gold ORMUS and Superconductivity

Citation: Hasson, M., Alkourdi, M.A. & Al-Raeei, M. (2024). "Paving the way for future advancements in superconductivity research through gold ormus studies." Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 13, 115.
Read the 2024 study

What it says: Academic researchers investigated ORMUS materials in the context of superconductivity research. The paper reviews potential applications and areas for further study.

Why it matters: This is 2024 peer-reviewed academic interest in ORMUS. The scientific community is looking at this again.

Section 4: Dosing Protocols

Standard Protocol

Phase Dose Timing Method
Week 1-2 (Loading) 2ml daily Morning, empty stomach Sublingual, hold 30-60 sec
Week 3+ (Maintenance) 1ml daily Adjust to response Some cycle: 5 days on, 2 off

Stacking Protocols

Cognitive Enhancement Stack

Supplement Dose Timing
ORMUS 1-2ml Morning, sublingual
Lion's Mane 500mg With breakfast
Bacopa Monnieri 300mg With breakfast

Note: Take ORMUS 30 minutes before other supplements

Meditation/Focus Stack

Supplement Dose Timing
ORMUS 1ml Before practice
L-Theanine 200mg With ORMUS
Magnesium L-Threonate 2g Evening

Sleep Optimization Stack

Supplement Dose Timing
ORMUS 0.5ml 2 hours before bed
Glycine 3g 1 hour before bed
Apigenin 50mg 30 min before bed

What NOT to Stack

  • High-dose stimulants: ORMUS appears to enhance sensitivity. Stimulants may feel stronger than expected.
  • MAOIs: Unknown interactions. Exercise caution.
  • Alcohol: Some users report increased sensitivity. Avoid combining.

Section 5: Tracking Your Experiment

Quantified Self Metrics

Metric Tool Options Frequency
HRV Oura Ring, Whoop, Elite HRV Daily morning
Sleep Quality Oura, Whoop, Eight Sleep Nightly
Reaction Time Cambridge Brain Sciences Weekly
Meditation Depth Muse headband Per session
Cognitive Performance Dual N-Back apps 2-3x weekly

Baseline Protocol

  1. Track all metrics for 2 weeks BEFORE starting ORMUS
  2. Continue same tracking during use
  3. Compare averages, not single data points
  4. Look for trends over 4+ weeks

The Skeptic's Checklist

Fair Criticisms

  • No double-blind RCTs
  • Replication challenges for some of Hudson's specific findings
  • Mechanism of action not definitively proven
  • Placebo effects common with consciousness-related supplements

Counter-Evidence

  • Peer-reviewed physics papers describe consistent phenomena
  • Hudson invested millions in lab equipment and credentialed scientists
  • Thousands of documented user experiences with consistent patterns
  • 2024 academic interest suggests scientific community taking another look

Your task: Run your own n=1 experiment. Track your own data. Trust your own experience alongside objective metrics.

Get the PDF + Research Updates

Download the complete ORMUS Research Compendium as a PDF and receive future research updates when new studies are published.

Ready to Run Your Own Experiment?

AUltra is the ORMUS we developed after reviewing this research.

Direct lineage to David Hudson's methods. Officially recommended by the David Hudson ORMUS group.

Get AUltra

This document is for informational purposes only. ORMUS is not FDA-approved for any medical condition. Consult a healthcare provider before starting any supplement regimen.

Sources & References

  • Puthoff, H.E. (1989). "Gravity as a zero-point-fluctuation force." Physical Review A 39(5), 2333-2342. Paper
  • Haisch, B., Rueda, A., & Puthoff, H.E. (1994). "Inertia as a zero-point-field Lorentz force." Physical Review A 49(2), 678-694. Paper
  • Hasson, M., Alkourdi, M.A. & Al-Raeei, M. (2024). "Paving the way for future advancements in superconductivity research through gold ormus studies." Beni-Suef University JBAS. Paper
  • Haisch, B. & Rueda, A. (2000). NASA Technical Report. NASA Report
  • Hudson, D.R. UK Patent GB2219995A. Patent
  • Hudson, D.R. (2011). ORMUS Conference, Enota. Video